№ 2023/1
Рынок: прогноз и конъюнктураНИКИШИНА Оксана Владимировна1, ЩЕРБАК Анатолий Васильевич2
1State Organization "Institute of Market and Economic&Ecological Research of the NAS of Ukraine"
2State Organization «Institute of Market and Economic&Ecological Research of the NAS of Ukraine»
Transition to selective regulation of retail trade in Ukraine on the basis of EU experience
АННОТАЦИЯ ▼
The article analyzes the causes and consequences of the rapid development of retail trade networks. It is shown that this contributed to increased production efficiency, while retail chains gained market power and began to play a key role in the supply chains of many consumer goods. This allows them to redistribute in their favor part of the value added created in other sectors. For this purpose, they use unfair trading practices: unjustified delays in payments for delivered products, imposing services that do not add value to suppliers, transferring commercial risks to them, etc.
The system of regulation of retail trade in European countries has been studied. Differences in the regulation of this sector in 13 countries were analyzed based on the data of the Retail Restrictiveness Indicator. It is shown that the strictest restrictions are enforced in Belarus and in Italy. The regulatory regime in the Baltic states is the most liberal. The authors argue that in the EU countries there is a tendency to move to selective regulation of retail trade, whose object primarily includes "discontinuities" in commodity and financial flows in the systems of vertically adjacent commodity markets. Selective regulation does not limit the operation of market mechanisms, but, on the contrary, promotes their more efficient functioning, eliminating market failures without a significant regulatory burden on business. On the one hand, restrictions on the opening of large-format stores, on trade at reduced prices, etc., are considerably eased. On the other hand, regulation is introduced in certain areas where it was not implemented before. Clarified changes in the regulatory system of retail trade in the EU after adoption of Directive 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain.
The authors substantiate the necessity and ways of transition to selective regulation of retail trade in Ukraine. It is shown that the prohibition of unfair trading practices in the food supply chain is much more important in Ukraine than in EU countries. The need to implement the norms of EU Directive 2019/633 into domestic legislation by adopting the Draft Law "On protection against unfair trading practices in relations between business entities in the field of supply of agricultural and food products" has been justified.
Ключевые слова:retail trade, retail trade chains, selective regulation, unfair trading practices
Статья на украинском языке (cтр. 76 - 96) | Загрузить | Загрузок : 80 |
ПЕРЕЧЕНЬ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ ▼
1. Герасименко А. Вертикальна конкуренція у вітчизняній торгівлі. Вісник Київського національного торговельно-економічного університету. 2016. № 4. С. 80–96.
2. Кавун-Мошковська О.О. Глобалізаційні тренди розвитку лідерів світової роздрібної торгівлі. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Міжнародні економічні відносини та світове господарство. 2022. № 42. С. 69–73.
3. Лісіца В. Державне регулювання діяльності роздрібних торговельних мереж в Україні в контексті світового досвіду. Проблеми і перспективы економіки та управління. 2016. № 3(7). С. 79–89.
4. Внутрішня торгівля України: монографія / за заг. ред. д-ра екон. наук, проф. А.А. Мазаракі. Київ: Київ.нац. торг.-екон. ун-т, 2016. 864 с.
5. П'ятницька Г.Т. Переваги і недоліки розвитку великих торговельних мереж на ринку роздрібної торгівлі продовольчими товарами. Актуальні проблеми економіки. 2013. № 4. С. 103–113.
6. Шерер Ф., Росс Д. Структура отраслевых рынков / пер. с англ. Москва: Инфра-М, 1997. 697 с.
7. Grocery market share in Great Britain 2017–2022. URL:
www.statista.com/statistics/280208/grocery-market-share-in-the-united-kingdom-uk/
8. Market share of food retail chains in France 2022. URL:
www.statista.com/statistics/778198/market-share-supermarkets-hypermarkets-chains-france
9. Gereffi G. The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism / Eds. By Gereffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M. Praeger, Westport, 1994. Р. 95–122. URL:
scholars.duke.edu/display/per2170252
10. Hamilton G., Senauer B, Petrovic M. The Market Makers: How Retailers are Reshaping the Global Economy. Oxford University Press, 2011.
doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590179.001.0001
11. Private Label Today. URL:
www.plmainternational.com/industry-news/private-label-today
12. Tackling unfair trading practices (UTPs) in the business-to-business food supply chain / European Commission Communication. Strasbourg, 15.07.2014. COM(2014)472. URL:
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0472
13. Організаційно-економічні механізми формування ефективної логістики товарних ринків: монографія / Буркинський Б.В., Нікішина О.В., Тараканов М.Л. та ін. Одеса: ІПРЕЕД НАНУ, 2021. 264 с.
doi.org/10.31520/978-966-02-9571-1
14. European Parliament. Motion for a European Parliament resolution on unfair trading practices in the food supply chain. URL:
www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0173_EN.html
15. Global Powers of Retailing 2022. URL:
www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/consumer-business/articles/global-powers-of-retailing.html
16. Allain M.-L. and Chambolle C. Anti-competitive effects of resale-below-cost laws. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2011. Vol. 29(4). Р. 373–385. URL:
chambolle.io/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/3.AllainChambolle2011.pdf; doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.07.006
17. Bertrand M. Kramarz F. Does Entry Regulation Hinder Job Creation? Evidence from the French Retail Industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics. November 2002. Vol. 117, Is. 4. P. 1369–1413.
doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935052
18. A European retail sector fit for the 21st century. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions. Brussels, 19.4.2018 COM(2018) 219 final / European Commission. URL:
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC021915
19. Retail restrictiveness analysis in Eastern Europe. Report. Civitta. 2019. URL:
civitta.com/articles/retail-restrictiveness-analysis-in-emerging-europe
20. Буркинський Б.В., Нікішина О.В., Тараканов М.Л., Зеркіна О.О. Селективне регулювання систем товарних ринків в умовах нестабільності: наук. доповідь. Одеса: ДУ ІРЕЕД НАНУ, 2022. 113 с.
doi.org/10.31520/978-966-02-9956-6
21. European commission. Food Supply Chain - UTPs - survey results (2nd round). Brussels, 2022. URL:
datam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datam/mashup/FOODCHAIN_UTP_2/
22. Leveraging the Unfair Trading Practices Directive to benefit the Garment Sector. URL:
news.industriall-europe.eu/documents/upload/2021/9/637684400585561764_210106%20Draft%20Leveraging%20UTP%20transposition_20210927.pdf
23. Чопенко В. Незговірливий ритейл. Дзеркало тижня. Україна. 2015. 6 лютого. № 4.
24. Рішення Антимонопольного комітету України "Про порушення законодавства про захист економічної конкунції та накладання штрафу" від 29.04.2015 №182-р. URL:
amcu.gov.ua/npas/vityag-iz-rishennya-182-r-vid-29042015
25. Green Paper. Unfair trading practices in the business-to-business food and non-food supply chain in Europe. Brussels, 31.01.2013. COM(2013)37 / European Commission. URL:
eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0037
26. Щербак А.В. Роздрібні торговельні мережі в Україні: тенденції розвитку та проблеми домінування. Економіка: реалії часу. 2022. № 4 (62). С. 52–59.