№ 2021/3
Economy under the conditions of modern transformations
NAZUKOVA Nataliia Mykolaivna1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
A TOOLKIT FOR ASSESSING THE DIRECTIONS OF BUDGET FINANCING OF EDUCATION IN POST-CRISIS CONDITIONS
ABSTRACT ▼
Public financing of education is one of the most important fiscal instruments for responding to the challenges of post-pandemic economic recovery. Investments in higher and vocational education form the basis for the growth of total factor productivity, and therefore economic growth. At the same time, in the context of austerity, which will determine the directions of the budgetary policy of developing countries in the medium term, the key directions of fiscal intensification of the factors of economic growth require identification. It is proposed to include indicators of return on investments in various levels of education to the toolkit for assessing the directions of state financing of education as one of the most important factors of post-pandemic economic recovery in conditions of austerity. Differences in estimated returns from different educational levels can be taken into account in the development of public policy for financing education. The article offers an approbation for Ukraine of the approach of the Center for European Economic Research for calculating the return on investment in higher and vocational education. A feature of the proposed approach is the ability to simulate a sufficient amount of data on revenues of individuals in conditions of limited information. The calculations in the article are based, in addition to data on the level of wages of persons with higher and vocational education, on the amount of budgetary expenditures on education throughout the course of study per student, personal income tax rates, unemployment benefits and state social assistance per person. The proposed approach makes it possible to carry out scenario estimates of the return on investment in education based on macroeconomic forecasts and taking into account changes in tax legislation. It is found that in Ukraine the return on investment in higher and vocational education corresponds to the average values of the corresponding indicators for the OECD countries. The author outlines the guidelines of the proposed methodological approach and prospective areas for its application.
The publication prepared within the research project on "The Fiscal Space Development for Economic Growth" (SR No. 0119U003650).
Keywords:public funding of education, return on investment in education, economic crisis, COVID-19 pandemic, state aid, tax revenues
JEL: H52, I22, I26, R15
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 118 - 130) | Download | Downloads :388 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Lunina, Inna; Bilousova, Olena; Nazukova, Nataliia (2021). Modern challenges and new opportunities for fiscal activation of economic growth factors. Publishing House "Baltija Publishing".
doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-108-4-3
2. International Monetary Fund (2020, October). World Economic Outlook: A Long and Difficult Ascent. Washington, DC.
3. Psacharopoulos, George & Patrinos, Harry Anthony (2018). Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26:5, 445-458. Retrieved from
www.researchgate.net/publication/325629937_Returns_to_investment_in_education_a_decennial_review_of_the_global_literature; doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426
4. Psacharopoulos, G. (1995). The Profitability of Investment in Education: Concepts and Methods. World Bank, Human Capital Development and Operations Policy, Working Papers, 63.
Retrieved from
www.researchgate.net/publication/325629937_Returns_to_investment_in_education_a_decennial_review_of_the_global_literature
5. Nonneman, W. and Cortens, I. (1997). A Note on the Rate of Return to Investment in Education in Belgium. Applied Economics Letters, 4(3), 167-171.
doi.org/10.1080/135048597355447
6. Trostel, P.A. (2010). The Fiscal Impacts of College Attainment. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 220-247.
doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9156-5
7. OECD (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators.
doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
8. Flannery, D., and O'Donoghue, C. (2016). Utilizing Microsimulation to Estimate the Private and Fiscal Returns to Education: Ireland 1987-2011. The Manchester School, 84(1), 55-80.
doi.org/10.1111/manc.12088
9. O'Donoghue, C. (1999). Estimating the Rate of Return to Education using Microsimulation. Economic and Social Review, 30(3), 249-266.
10. De la Fuente, A. and Jimeno, J. F. (2009). The Private and Fiscal Returns to Schooling in the European Union. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(6), 1319-1360.
doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.6.1319
11. Pfeiffer, Friedhelm & Stichnoth, Holger (2015). Fiskalische und individuelle Bildungsrenditen: Aktuelle Befunde für Deutschland. ZEW Discussion Papers 15-010. ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2015-0023 [in German].
12. National Standard Classification of Education. Retrieved from
naps.gov.ua/uploads/files/sod/NSKO.pdf [in Ukraine].
13. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2018). National Education Accounts of Ukraine in 2016. Kyiv [in Ukraine].
14. General and vocational educational institutions (2018). Kyiv [in Ukraine].
15. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) (2014). The Ukrainian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey. Research Data Center of IZA (IDSC). Version 1.0.
doi.org/10.15185/izadp.7090.1
16. The State Treasury Service of Ukraine. Retrieved from
www.treasury.gov.ua/ua