HOME PAGE | |
№ 3/2008
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, KYRYZIUK S. 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Institutional foundations of the changes in state support of Ukraine’ agrarian sector in the context of wto requirements
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2008; 3:87-105 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors consider the adaptation of the system of budget support and management of the public finance in this country’s agrarian sector to the WTO requirements. They justify the necessity of qualitative transformations of the institutional environment for the support of agriculture and concrete measures for its improvement. The article proposes a mechanism to adjust the distribution of the state’s financial resources for the agriculture based on the indicators of social utility and comparative advantages of the agrarian enterprises in the context of the WTO requirements and modern experience of the Western managerial systems
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 87 - 105) | Download | Downloads :752 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Kobuta I., Uzgodzhenist reguliuvannia zovnishnoekonomichnoi diialnosti v APK Ukrainy ta Rosii z pryntsypamy SOT , Ekonomika APK, 2006, № 6, S. 149–155.
3. Ostashko T,. Silske gospodarstvo Ukrainy v umovakh SOT: ochikuvannia vyrobnykiv y analitychni peredbachennia, Dzerkalo tyzhnia, 2005, 6–12 serpnia.
4. Ostashko T., Integratsiia Ukrainy do SOT: realni ta uiavni ryzyky dlia silskogo gospodarstva , Ekonomist, 2005, № 10, S. 30–33.
5. Sydenko V., Baranovskyi O. Ukraina i svitova organizatsiia torgivli: yak zbilshyty pliusy ta zmenshyty minusy?, Dzerkalo tyzhnia, 2002, 13–19 lypnia.
6. Yermakov O., SOT: vygody ta problemy dlia silskogospodarskykh tovarovyrobnykiv Ukrainy, Bukhgalteriia v silskomu gospodarstvi, 2005, № 22, S. 2–7.
7. Countries in Transition 2001, WIIW Handbook of Statistics, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, 2001, 497 p.
8. Borodina O.M., Derzhavna pidtrymka silskogo gospodarstva: kontseptsiia, mekhanizmy, efektyvnist , Ekonomika i prognozuvannia, 2006, № 1, S. 109–125.
9. Ugoda pro silske gospodarstvo,
10. Kyryziuk S.V., Naslidky vstupu Ukrainy do SOT dlia agrarnogo sektora,Efektyvnist biznesu v umovakh transformatsiynoi ekonomiky: Materialy II mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, Simferopol , Yalta, Krymskyi instytut biznesu, 2008, S. 55–57.
11. Kobuta I. Derzhavna pidtrymka silskogo gospodarstva u konteksti vstupu Ukrainy do SOT Mizhnarodna konferentsiia Agrobiznes Ukrainy ta SOT: novi mozhlyvosti ta zagrozy, m. Kyiv, 1 liutogo 2008 Elektronnyi resurs , Dostupnyi z: <www.agroconf.org/uk/system/files/State_Support_WTO.ppt>.
12. Kyryziuk S.V. Superechnosti zastosuvannia biudzhetnykh dotatsiy u tvarynnytstvi Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskogo natsionalnogo universytetu: zbirnyk nauk. prats., Vyp. 366., Ekonomika, Chernivtsi, Ruta, 2007, S. 92–96.
13. Borodina O.M, Mogylnyi O.M., Koryguvannia polityky derzhavnoi pidtrymky silskogo gospodarstva Ukrainy , Ekonomika APK, 2007, № 6, S. 55–61.
№ 1/2010
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The new challenges for the agrarian sector in the light of the formation of the Ukraine-EU free trade area
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2010; 1:130-141 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article generalizes the peculiarities of the European model of support of national agricul-tural producers and its impact on the degree of liberalization of foreign trade with third coun-tries. The author analyzes the main contradictions of the systems of farmer support in the light of the formation of the Ukraine-EU free trade area
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 130 - 141) | Download | Downloads :638 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Gresser E. A Floundering WTO , Part I <yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=7153>.
3. Chile’s Trade Indicators Year 2008, <www.delchl.ec.europa.eu/en/eu_and_country/Documents/Chile_Trade_Indicators.pdf>.
4. Bilateral trade relations: Chile, EU Commission. EU and the world. External trade, <ec.europa.eu/trade/issues/bilateral/countries/chile/index_en.htm>.
5. Berthelot J. The EU minimal OTDS in the implementation period, J. Berthelot, Solidarite, <www.solidarite.asso.fr/home/rеsuite/The%20EU%20minimal%20OTDS%20in%20the%20implementation%20period,%20180708.pdf>.
№ 3/2012
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, PROKOPA Ihor 2, KYRYZIUK S. 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Commercialization of the farming households as a way of improving the rural incomes
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2012; 3:79-91 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the opportunities and key factors of the increase of farming households’ incomes by way of their implementation in the market agro food system. Typical households groups have been excreted on the basis of socio-demographic characteristics. It was ascertained that the current socio-economic policy is not able to solve the problem of rural poverty. As a result, more than half of the families with children, who shape the future of the Ukrainian village, belong to the poorest households. Therefore, the authors justify the need of a policy to support the incomes of rural families in order to improve their commercialization. Using the statistical method of grouping and matching, the authors identified various key factors of the commercialization of agricul-tural activities of selected social groups of rural households and their economic effect, which is increasing the incomes from the sale of agricultural products. It was estimated that the highest effect for improving welfare of the poor rural households can be achieved through increasing land in use (extensive method) or raising technical and technological and innovation support (intensive method) of the households agricultural activity. The calcula-tions confirm the highest income increase is possible with the joint effect of the two factors, which requires the increase in the land area in use up to 2 ha and annual expenditures on agricultural activities, within the techno-logical feasibility, in the amount of UAH 2-3 thousand. The authors suggest to provide the necessary level of expenditures though the implementation of targeted state support for selected household groups over a period of up to 5 years in exchange for their guaranty to improve the level of commercialization.
Keywords:private peasant farm, agrarian activities, market orientation, factors of commercialization
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 79 - 91) | Download | Downloads :835 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. S.Davidova, L.Fredriksson and A.Bailey, Subsistence and Semisubsistence Farming Households in Selected EU New Member States, University of Kent, 2009, 23 r.
3. Paciorkovskij V.V. Sel`skaya Rossiya: 1991–2001 gg., M., Finansy i statistika, 2003, S. 211–215.
4. Keyzer, M.A, S.Pande. Classification by crossing and polling for integrated processing of maps and surveys. An addendum to GRCPsoftware, Working Paper 0704, Amsterdam, SOWVU.
№ 1/2016
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, KYRYZIUK S. 2, YAROVYI Victor 3, ERMOLIEV Yuri 4, ERMOLIEVA Tatiana 5
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
4International Institute for Applied System Analysis
5International Institute for Applied System Analysis
Modeling local land uses under the global climate change
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2016; 1:117-128 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.01.117 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The interdependencies among land use systems at national and international levels motivate the development of global land use models facilitating the analysis of the trends of plausible future land use under the conditions of increasing population and climate change for environmental and food security purposes. Computational complexity of such models limits the land use projections to aggregate levels which give no clue regarding the potentially critical local heterogeneities. Improving these projections at fine resolutions requires new methods of systems analysis for integrating land use models at different scales. For that purpose, we have proposed a dynamic cross-entropy based probabilistic downscaling model which facilitates to obtain future aggregate land use projections from global models (e.g. GLOBIOM) to finer resolutions. The proposed procedure allows incorporating data received from different sources, such as satellite images, statistics, and expert opinions, as well as data from global land use models.
Using downscaling procedure, we estimate future impacts of global climate changes on the land use in Ukraine (on the rayon level) in accordance with the aggregated results of GLOBIOM modeling. They indicate some growth of pressure on land resources in Ukraine associated with the satisfaction of the increasing global demands for foods and biofuels. On the one side, the model forecasts a small growth of demand (0.2%) for arable land by the middle of the XXI century. At the national level, it doesn't pose any serious threats, but, on the case regional level, it can lead to certain ecological risks (in the oblasts with an extremely high share of arable land). On the other side, the model also predicts some growth of the demand for forests, including SRF, and pastures. These changes could have some positive effect by supporting safety and sustainable land use in Ukraine.
Further investigations will be oriented to comparing the results of modeling based on different available maps of land cover and land use (GLC2000, MODIS2000, GLOBCOVER2000) and to estimating the land demand under different scenarios of agriculture improvements (technology, management etc.).
Keywords: land use, modeling, aggregated data, downscaling
JEL: C18, Q15, Q54
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 117 - 128) | Download | Downloads :1190 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Britz, W., Verburg, P. H., Leip, A. (2011). Modelling of land cover and agricultural change in Europe: Combining the CLUE and CAPRI-Spat approaches. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ, 142, 40–50. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.008
3. Chomitz, K. M., Gray, D. A. (1996). Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Econ. Rev., 10, 487–512. doi: doi.org/10.1093/wber/10.3.487
4. Dietrich, J. P., Schmitz, C., Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A., Müller, C. (2014). Forecasting technological change in agriculture - An endogenous implementation in a global land use model. Technol. Forecast. Soc., 81, 236–249. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.003
5. Heubes, J., Schmidt. M., Stuch. B., Márquez, J. R. G., Wittig, R., Zizka, G., Thiombiano, A., Sinsin, B., Schaldach, R., Hahn, K. (2013). The projected impact of climate and land use change on plant diversity: An example from West Africa. J. Arid Environ., 96, 48–54. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.04.008
6. Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 3465–3472. doi: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
7. Havlík, P., Schneider, U., Schmid, E., Bőttcher, H., Fritz, S., Skalsky, R., Aoki, K., De Cara, S., Kindermann, G, Kraxner, F., Leduc, S., McCallum, I., Mosnier, A., Sauer, T., Obersteiner, M. (2011). Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy policy, 39, 5690–5702. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.030
8. Zhang, X., Ermolieva, T., Balkovic, J., Mosnier, A., Kraxner, F., Liu, J. (2015) Recursive cross-entropy downscaling model for spatially explicit future land uses: A case study of the Heihe River Basin. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 89–90:56–64. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.05.007
9. Skalsky´, R., Tarasovicˇova´, Z., Balkovicˇ, J., Schmid, E., Fuchs, M., Moltchanova, E., Kindermann, G. and Scholtz, P. (2008). Geo-bene global database for bio-physical modeling v. 1.0. Concepts, methodologies and data. Technical Report, IIASA. Retrieved from www.geo-bene.eu/files/Deliverables/Geo-BeneGlbDb10(DataDescription).pdf
10. Chances for die-hard: energy future of lumber. Ukrainian arboriculturist. Retrieved from www.lesovod.org.ua/node/3014 [in Ukrainian].
11. Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food with World Bank develop the Strategy of irrigation revitalization in the South of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=248828800&cat_id=244277212 [in Ukrainian].
№ 3/2017
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The inclusion of small agriproducers in the state support system
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2017; 3:97-110 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.03.097 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The Common Agricultural Policy of European Union (CAP EU) is the most modern model of agrarian policy, that provides equal competitive capacities for the development of each agriproducer and rural areas. Taking into account the European vector of Ukraine' development, this investigation aims to analyze the European support system in terms of the promotion of small argiproducers, which can help to offer some recommendations for the improvement of Ukrainian agrarian policy.
Analysis of CAP EU indicates that measures of rural development pillar are more favorable for small farm development than market support programs. But the inclusion of small farms and, in particular, semi-subsistence farms into the rural development programs is lower than that of the larger commercial enterprises. And access limitation to the support program for small farms depends both on the direct factors (minimal access levels) and on the indirect ones (entrepreneur and personal skills, education level, information availability etc.).
Practical experience of CEE countries confirms that participation of small farms in the non-oriented rural development programs is very low (less than 0.5 percent of total). In this case it is more efficient to use the target programs, like the Measure 141 "Semi-subsistence farm support", implemented specially for the CEE countries. Each CEE country adapted the European regulation with regard to their agriculture structure. This helped to identify a well-defined target group of the most viable beneficiary farms. The most successful case study among the investigated CEE countries is the Polish one due to the favorable institutional environment (including fiscal policy for small agriproducers) and the active work of the local advisory services.
Specialists mention the insufficiency of a solely financial support for modernization of small farms. The development of these agriproducers requires a parallel solution of one more problem, namely the expansion of their outlets.
We estimated the number of potential applicants in the case of implementing a similar program in Ukraine using different scenarios of access criteria. In determining the amount of support, one should consider not only the need to expand financing of current production costs, but primarily the need to raise capital investment in the farms' fixed assets.
Since it has been established that the possibilities of increasing agrarian output and the level of commercialization of semi-subsistence farms in Ukraine are related to the development of livestock production, much attention should be paid to the expansion of the trade channels and, above all, their inclusion into the agri-food chains (short and long ones). In this case, it is necessary to use all the opportunities arising in the context of strengthening connection and communication between towns and villages, as well as increasing the mobility and accessibility of remote areas.
Keywords: semi-subsistence farming households, market support measures, rural development, EU Common Agricultural Policy
JEL: Q 01, Q 12
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 97 - 110) | Download | Downloads :814 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Ministry of agriculture implements European experience of support for small farmers – Volodimir Lapa (2017). Retrieved from a7d.com.ua/novini/19927-mnagropoltiki-zaprovadzhuye-yevropeyskiy-dosvd-pdtrimki-drbnih-agraryiv-volodimir-lapa.html [in Ukrainian].
3. The Common Agricultural Policy – A story to be continued (2012). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
4. Davidova, S., Gorton, M., Fredriksson, L. (2010) Semi-subsistence farming in Europe: Concepts and key issues. European Network for rural development.
5. Burrell Alison (Ed.). (2010). Economic prospects for semi-subsistence farm households in EU New Member States. JRC. IPTS. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
6. Semi-subsistence farming: value and directions of development (2013). European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development.
7. Zinchuk, T., Kutsmus, N. (2006). Social insurance of rural population in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe – members of EU. Ekonomika APK – Economy of agroindustrial complex, 3, 102-109 [in Ukrainian].
8. Alexandri, C. (2014). The role of small farms in Romanian rural areas. Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, New Series, XI: 1, 3-14.
9. National Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 (2010). Fifth version. Government of Romania. .
10. Kyryziuk, S. (2016) Outlook diagnosis for institutionalization of farming household. Ekonomika i suspilstvo – Economics and Society, 5, 341-347 [in Ukrainian].
11. Two family milk farms were created in Drogobich region (2016). Retrieved from zaxid.net/shhe_dvi_molochni_simeyni_fermi_vidkrili_na_drogobichchini_n1408271 [in Ukrainian].
12. Sub-urban food production in a Swiss agglomeration: case study report (2015). RURAGRI.
№ 3/2018
TRYPOLSKA Galyna Serhiivna1, KYRYZIUK S. 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Development of Ukraine's bioenergy sector in the context of the EU guidelines
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2018; 3:138-159 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.03.138 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The European bioenergy policy is changing dynamically, following the trend of sustainable development. Ukraine, having the significant agricultural potential and following the European vector of development, strongly depends on the European tendencies. Changing the structure and level of demand for bioenergy resources has an important effect on the development of the national bioenergy market and the production policy of agriproducers.
The purpose of this study is to summarize the impact of recent institutional and legislative initiatives of the EU on the development of the bioenergy market in Ukraine and analyze possible challenges in the field of land use in this regard.
The paper highlights the instability of the development of Ukraine's domestic biofuels market. Stagnation in the market for liquid biofuels is mainly a result of regulatory shortcomings. At the same time, Ukraine's exports to the EU markets, due to the scarce and technologically outdated processing capacity, remains limited to bioenergy raw materials. Analysis of the trends in the production and exports of rapeseeds in Ukraine indicates a high dependence on the EU market. A similar situation also persisted in the market of solid biofuels. The main factor of change here was the increase in domestic prices for traditional energy resources in 2015-2016, which caused subsequent changes in the tariff policy. The analysis conducted made it possible to identify key trends and measures to encourage the development of Ukraine's biomass market.
The growing demand for biofuels gradually leads to changes in the structure of land use in Ukraine. However, due to the high level of cultivation in Ukraine, the scale of these changes in quantitative terms is negligible. During 2004-2016, the area of arable land only increased by 0.3%. At the same time, the threats to sustain-able development are not so much related to the general changes in land use, as to structural changes in the field of plant growing. Modeling results indicate a possible increase in the pressure on land resources in the future as a result of the implementation of European bioenergy policy. In the meantime, a milder effect could be achieved by implementing a scenario of limiting the use of the first generation biofuels, which include rapeseed oil: in this scenario, the additional need for arable land might be by one third lower than in the baseline scenario.
Analysis gives grounds for concluding that it is only the types of raw materials used for biofuel production that will change in the future, while both political and market conditions will contribute to the cultivation of new types of raw materials growth for exporting to the EU and for meeting Ukraine's domestic needs in biofuels in accordance with the international obligations incurred. The market policy of Ukrainian producers (mainly of those export-oriented ones) in such conditions can carry certain risks to sustainable development of rural areas. This requires improvement of regulatory policy in the field of land use and development of appropriate mechanisms to prevent the critical use of biomass as the only source of maintaining the natural fertility of soils.
Keywords: bioenergy sector, biofuels, biomass, Indirect Land Use Change, EU
JEL: Q 280, Q 420, Q 480
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 138 - 159) | Download | Downloads :800 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast) COM/2016/0767 final/2 - 2016/0382 (COD). Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu
3. Clean Energy for all. The revised Renewable energy Directive (2017). Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/technical_memo_renewables.pdf
4. Promoting renewable energy use – Council adopts its position (2017). Press release. Retrieved from www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2017/12/18/promoting-renewable-energy-use-council-adopts-its-position/
5. MEPs set ambitious targets for cleaner, more efficient energy use (2018). Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180112IPR91629/meps-set-ambitious-targets-for-cleaner-more-efficient-energy-use
6. Decree of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated Oct.1, 2014 No. 902-r "On National Action Plan on Renewable Energy until 2020". Retrieved from www.zakon.rada.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
7. 10% of boiler houses operate using biomass (2017). Retrieved from landlord.ua [in Ukrainian].
8. Antonenko, V., Zubenko, V., Oliynyk, Ye., Radchenko, S. (2017). Development and commercialization of bioenergy technologies in municipal sector in Ukraine. Kyiv: PROON. Retrieved from bioenergy.in.ua/media/filer_public/ee/f5/eef5a439-70ab-4d49-85e2-fad0741edc96/jkhfin.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. Geletukha, G. (2017). State of Art and Prospects of Bioenergy Development in Ukraine. Retrieved from uabio.org/img/files/Events/pdf/BioDay/2-Geletukha-bioenergy-state-and-prospects-ukraine-bioenergyday-12April2017.pdf [in Ukrainian].
10. Thrän, D., Peetz, D., Schaubach, K. Global Wood Pellet Industry and Trade Study (2017). International Energy Agency. Retrieved from task40.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/IEA-Wood-Pellet-Study_final-2017-06.pdf
11. Development and commercialization of bioenergy technologies in municipal sector in Ukraine. Analytical Report and Recommendations on Planting of Energy Crops in Ukraine (2016). Retrieved from bioenergy.in.ua/media/filer_public/58/b4/58b45b61-d09d-43bf-bcb7-47e0235d39e0/otchet_po_verbe.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Energy Balance in 2016 (2017) .Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
13. The share of green energy in energy balance of Ukraine doubled in 6 years (2017). Retrieved from biz.censor.net.ua [in Ukrainian].
14. Zubko, G. (2017). The Government approved the order of stimulating tariff for producers of heat from renewables. Retrieved from kmu.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
15. Average weighted fares for heat produced using natural gas for the needs of households and organizations that is financed from federal or local budgets, its transportation and supply (2017). State Agency on Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency of Ukraine. Retrieved from saee.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
16. Draft Law on Amendments to some Laws of Ukraine regarding production of liquid biofuels from biomass and introduction sustainability criteria of liquid biofuels from biomass and biogas aimed at use at transport No. 7348 dated 29.11.2017 (2017). Retrieved from rada.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
17. Trypolska, G.S., Podolets, R.Z. (2017). Biofuels market in Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 2, 75-92. doi: doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.075 [in Ukrainian].
18. MEPs set ambitious targets for cleaner, more efficient energy use (2018). Retrieved from europarl.europa.eu
19. Sapp, M. (2018). France says it is against palm oil discrimination. Retrieved from biofuelsdigest.com
20. European Parliament 2014-2019. Amendments 1-67. Draft opinion Tiziana Beghin (PE592.301v01-00) Palm oil and deforestation of rainforest. Retrieved from europarl.europa.eu
21. Sapp, M. (2018). EU opens subsidy investigation against Argentine biodiesel imports. Retrieved from biofuelsdigest.com
22. Schaffartzik, A., Plank, C., Brad, A. (2014). Ukraine and the great biofuel potential? A political material flow analysis. Ecological Economics, 104, 12-21. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.026
23. Baral, A., Malins, C.H. (2016). Additional supporting evidence for significant iLUC emissions of oilseed rape biodiesel production in the EU based on causal descriptive modeling approach. GCB. Bioenergy, 8, 382-391. doi: doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12254
24. Geletukha, G., Zheliezna, T. (2012). Position of Bioenergy in the Draft Updated Energy Strategy of Ukraine Till 2030 - Position Paper. Bioenergy Association of Ukraine. Retrieved from uabio.org/img/files/docs/position-paper-uabio-1-en.pdf
25. Popov, A. (2016). State of Art and major trends of agricultural lands use. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy, 2. Retrieved from economy.nayka.com.ua [in Ukrainian].
26. Tarariko, O.G., Il'enko, T.V., Kuchma, T.L. (2016). Climate change impacts on yields and total production of grains: analysis and forecast. Ukrainskyi heohrafichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian geography magazine, 1, 14-22 [in Ukrainian].
27. Valin, H., Peters, D., Van den Berg, M., Frank, S., Havlik, P., Forsell, N., Hamelinck, C., Pirker, J. et al. (2015). The land use change impact of biofuels consumed in the EU: Quantification of area and greenhouse gas impacts. ECOFYS Netherlands B.V., Utrecht, Netherlands. doi: BIENL13120
28. Borodina, O., Kyryzyuk, S., Yarovyy, V., Yermolyev, Yu., Yermolyeva, T. (2016). Modeling Local Land uses under the Global Climate Change. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 117-128. doi: doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.01.117 [in Ukrainian].
29. Croezen, H.J., Bergsma, G.C., Otten, M.B.J., Van Valkengoed, M.P.J. (2010). Biofuels: indirect land use change and climate impact. Retrieved from www.globalbioenergy.org/uploads/media/1006_CE_Delft_-_Biofuels_indirect_land_use_change_and_climate_impact.pdf
30. Fischer, G., Prieler, S., van Velthuizen, H., Berndes, G., Faaij, A., Londo, M., De Wit, M. (2010). Biofuel production potentials in Europe: Sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34 (2), 173-187. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.009
31. In Zhytomyr region, EUR 135 mln are invested in bioethanol plant (2017). Retrieved from agronews.ua [in Ukrainian].
32. New life of sugar refinery in Odessa region: bioetanol, bioCHP and solar power plant (2018). Retrieved from ecotown.com.ua [in Ukrainian].
№ 4/2018
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, KYRYZIUK S. 2, PROKOPA Ihor 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Farming potential of households: methodical approaches to evaluation and development
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2018; 4:106-115 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.04.106 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Based on extended interpretation of the essence of farming, the article outlines the boundaries of the farming segment in Ukrainian agriculture. This farming segment includes not only registered farms, but also those households, which meet the global farming criteria. The authors estimate the number of the households (personal peasant farms) of farmer type and their productive potential and prove that one of the top priorities in improving the mechanism of state support for farming is encouraging the households to institutionalize (formalize) their agricultural activities.
It is proposed to introduce a five-year program to provide financial assistance to the households (personal peasant farms) in order to expand the scale of their current agricultural output, to start new activities, and to increase the level of commercialization and subsequent formalization in the regulatory environment. The main provisions of the program were developed, such as the requirements for potential beneficiaries and the results of their participation in the program; conditions for the allocation and use of support funds; estimated number of participants; the need for budget financing etc. According to calculations, during the program period, it will involve 75 thousand households, who, after fulfilling all the stipulated conditions, will join the farm segment.
Keywords: state support, households, business plan, personal peasant farms (PPF), state support program, farmers potential, formalization of PPF activity
JEL: Q01, Q12
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 106 - 115) | Download | Downloads :732 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Hubeni, Yu.E., Koverko, Yu.A. (2017). Peasant farm development under administrative decentralization. Ekonomika APK – Economics of agro-industrial complex, 1, 68-73 [in Ukrainian].
3. Hubeni, Yu.E., Koverko, Yu.A., Olishchuk, P.O. (2017). Development of personal peasant farms under conditions of institutional changes. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 3, 59-67 [in Ukrainian].
4. Malik, M.Y., Shpykuliak, O.H. (2018). Trends and prospects of peasant farm development. Ekonomika APK – Economics of agro-industrial complex, 1, 11-19 [in Ukrainian].
5. Tulush, L.D., Hryshchenko, O.Yu. (2018). Transformation of commercial households into enterprises: taxes and budget aspects. Ekonomika APK – Economics of agro-industrial complex, 1, 40-52 [in Ukrainian].
6. Poczta, W., Szuba-Baranska, E., Beba, P., Czubak, W. (2015). Strukturalna i ekonomiczna różnorodność a możliwości rozwoju gospodarstw rodzinnych w UE. Wieś i Rolnictwo, 1, 59-66 [in Polish].
7. Chernyakov, V.A. (2012). Modern drivers of modernization of USA agriculture. SShA i Kanada: jekonomika, politika, kul'tura – USA and Canada: economics, policy, culture, 11, 89 [in Russian].
8. Bilenko, S. Farming as a business: who are the Ukrainian farmers and which problems they face. Retrieved 11 December 2018 from delo.ua/business/fermerstvo-jak-biznes-hto-taki-ukrajinski-fermeri-i-z-jakimi-pro-334838/ [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |