HOME PAGE | |
№ 2/2017
SOKOLOVSKA Alla Mykhajlivna1, RAINOVA Larysa 2
1Research Financial Institute, State Educational and Scientific Institution "Academy of Financial Management"
2SESE "The Academy of Financial Management"
Harmonization of excise tax on tobacco products
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2017; 2:93-115 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.093 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with the experience of post-socialist EU countries, in particular, Bul-garia, as to the accomplishment of minimal requirements to the level of excise taxation of cigarettes within the general process of tax harmonization. The authors consider conse-quences of this policy in the context of its impact on the cigarette market, achievement of health goals and provision of the planned level of budget revenues. Analyzed the contradictions harmonization of the excise tax on cigarettes in EU, which take the form of the change of its target reference points, i.e. complementing the indicator of minimum level of the overall excise rate on cigarettes with minimal requirements to the size of excise yield, which is recognized as the most effective mechanism for reducing price differentiation among EU countries.
The authors define features of the excise policy in Ukraine, which is characterized by high rates of increase of the specific excise and a minimum excise duty on cigarettes. There are arguments in favor of the assumption that this trend did not lead to price shock only because the cigarette manufacturers, competing for the market, tried to keep low prices for their products. It is concluded that, in Ukraine, the continuation of the aggressive policy of raising excise rates for cigarettes, especially in a combination with the establishment by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of minimum wholesale and retail prices for them, sooner or later can lead to a price increase and, on this basis, to the expansion of the shadow cigarette market.
The authors justify the necessity of compliance by the Ukrainian government of such principles of efficient excise policy as gradual increase of excise tax rates, development and implementation of a stage-by-stage plan of harmonization of the tax burden on tobacco products, considering, in the process at setting tax rates on cigarettes, such factors as the risk of smuggling, purchasing power of local consumers, tax rates in neighboring countries, and the ability and effectiveness of the tax authority to enforce compliance with the tax legislation.
The article was prepared within the research project on “Improving the tax system with the decentralization of state power” (No of state registration 0115U000938).
Keywords: tax harmonization, excise tax, ad valorem excise, specific excise, overall minimum excise duty, excise yield
JEL: E 62
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 93 - 115) | Download | Downloads :897 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Jha, P., Chaloupka, F.J. (1999). Curbing the epidemic: Governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from www.cghr.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Curbing-the-Epidemic-Tobacco-Control-World-Bank-1999-Prabhat-Jha.pdf
3. Blecher, E., Ross, H., Stoklosa, M. (2013). Lessons learned from cigarette tax harmonization in the European Union. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/profile/Evan_Blecher/publication/235620229_Lessons_learned_from_cigarette_tax_harmonisation_in_the_European_Union/links/5559b4b208ae980ca6107c70.pdf
4. David, P. (2009). Selected aspects of taxation of cigarettes in the EU member states. Agricul-tural Economics (AGRICECON), 1, 40-50. Retrieved from agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/03752.pdf
5. Ganev, P. (2013). Excise Taxation of Tobacco Products in Bulgaria – Review and Recom-mendations. Review and Analysis of Excise Taxation of Tobacco Products in Bulgaria in the 2007-2013 Period and Recommendations in view of Achieving New EU Requirements by 2018. IME Analysis. Retrieved from ime.bg/var/images/IME_excise_tobacco_report_2013_EN.pdf
6. Cooper, A., Witt, D. (2012). The linkage between tax burden and illicit trade of excisable products: the example of tobacco. World Customs Journal, 6:2, 41-58. Retrieved from worldcustomsjournal.org/Archives/Volume%206,%20Number%202%20(Sep%202012)/06%20Cooper_Witt.pdf
7. Krasovsky, K.S. (2016). Analysis of tobacco excise tax policy in Ukraine in 2013-2016 from the public health perspective. Ekonomika i pravo okhorony` zdorov'ya – Economics and Law of health protection, 2(4), 100-107 [in Ukrainian].
8. Korotun, V.I. (Ed.).(2015). Transformation of the excise policy of Ukraine. Irpin: Vydavnyc-tvo Nacionalnoho universytetu DPS Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].
9. Balakin, R.L. (2007). Excise taxing of tobacco products in the member states of European Union and in Ukraine. Finansy` Ukrayiny` – Finance of Ukraine, 10, 96-110 [in Ukrainian].
10. Koschuk, T.V. (2015). Adaptation of the tax legislation of Ukraine to the EU directives concerning the levying an excise duty. Naukovi praci NDFI – RFI scientific papers, 3(72), 52-67 [in Ukrainian].
11. Boyarchuk, D., Lyeshhenko, N. (2015, July 15). Cigarettes, smuggling and excise taxes: European practices of the harmonization of excise tax rates. Biznes-rada “Ciny` derzhavy`” – Business Council "National prices". Retrieved from costua.com/files/cigarettes-smuggling-excise.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Bulgaria. (n. d.). Revenues Reports of Bulgaria 2010-2015. Retrieved from www.minfin.bg/en/page/1143
13. European Commission.(2003-2016). Excise duty tables. Part III – Manufactured Tobacco. Retrieved from www.ec.europa.eu
14. KPMG. (2011, August 22). Project Star, 2010 Results. KPMG Report. Retrieved from www.pmi.com/eng/tobacco_regulation/illicit_trade/Documents/SUN%20Report%202014.pdf
15. KPMG. (n. d.). Project SUN. A study of the illicit cigarette market in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. KPMG Report, 2015 Results. Retrieved from www.pmi.com/eng/tobacco_regulation/illicit_trade/Documents/project-sun-report2015.pdf
16. European Commission. (2016, July). Excise Duty Tables (Tax receipts – Manufactured Tobacco). REF 1046. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/docs/body/excise_duties_tobacco_en.pdf
17. Eurostat. (n. d.). Tax revenue statistics; National accounts and GDP. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat
18. World Health Organization. (2010). WHO Technical Manual On Tobacco Tax Administra-tion. Geneva. Retrieved from apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44316/1/9789241563994_eng.pdf
19. International Tax & Investment Center. (2011, December). A Review of the WHO Technical Manual on Tobacco Tax Administration: One Size Does Not Fit All. Special Report. Retrieved from www.iticnet.org/images/WHO%20Technical%20Manual-Final.pdf
20. International Tax & Investment Center. (2014, September).The importance of fiscal sover-eignty in tobacco taxation: Comments on the draft guidelines for implementation of Article 6 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Special Report. Retrieved from www.iticnet.org/images/COP6SpecialReport.pdf
21. Ross, H.Z., Shariff, S., Gilmore, A. (2008). Economics of tobacco taxation in Russia. Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Retrieved from global.tobaccofreekids.org/files/pdfs/en/Russia_tobacco_taxes_full_en.pdf
22. Ross, H.Z, Shariff, S., Gilmore, A. (2009). Economics of tobacco taxation in Ukraine. Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Retrieved from global.tobaccofreekids.org/files/pdfs/en/Ukraine_tobacco_taxes_report_en.pdf
23. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. (n. d.). Tax policies on tobacco products in Thailand: the way forward. New Delhi. Retrieved from www.smoke-free.ca/trade-and-tobacco/Thailand/TFI_TaxPolicies.pdf
24. World Health Organization. (2014, March 27). Draft guidelines for implementation of Article 6 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Report of the open-ended intersessional drafting group. Retrieved from apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/146952/1/FCTC_COP6_7-en.pdf
25. International Tax & Investment Center. (2013, September). Global “Best Practice” in Tobacco Tax Policy: Insight from Tax Practitioners Around the World. Special Report. Re-trieved from www.iticnet.org/images/Global__Best_Practice__in_Tobacco_Tax_Policy__Insight_from_Tax_Practitioners_Around_the_World.pdf
26. TNS Ukraine. KANTAR. (2016, August). Monitoring of illegal trafficking of cigarettes industrial production in Ukraine.
27. Yurekli, A. (2013). Economics of Tobacco Toolkit, Tool 4: Design and Administer To-bacco Taxes. World Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/16268/805770NWP040To0ox0379807B00PUBLIC00.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
№ 2/2021
1Research Financial Institute, State Educational and Scientific Institution "Academy of Financial Management"
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ESTIMATING THE USE OF TAX BENEFITS AND THE PRACTICE OF THEIR APPLICATION
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2021; 2:32-51 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2021.02.032 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Tax benefits, considering their consequences for the economy and the budget system, are the most controversial element of any tax. Therefore, policy decisions on the introduction of new, continued use or abolition of existing tax benefits should be based on reliable information about their expected or actual effectiveness and efficiency. The purpose of this article is to define methodological approaches to assessing the use of tax benefits as a prerequisite for improving the soundness of tax policy and effectiveness of public administration of the financial system.
The article, based on the analysis of Western literature sources, considers methodological approaches to assessing the use of tax benefits in the context of their effectiveness (achievement of goals and fulfillment of the conditions for granting, impact on the behavior of economic agents and results of their activity), efficiency (comparison of benefits and costs) and relative efficiency (comparison of the effectiveness of tax benefits and other policy instruments), as well as evaluation methods and tools. The practical application of these methodological approaches is considered on the example of investment and innovation incentives for corporate income tax and VAT incentives (reduced tax rate on labor-intensive services).
The author notes that the assessment of consequences of the introduction of tax benefits can be provided using methods of comparative analysis of the behavior of the beneficiary company before and after the introduction of the tax incentive; survey of the company's managers on how the tax benefit affected certain aspects of their behavior (investment decisions, implementation of R&D, employment and remuneration policies, etc.); and econometric analysis.
According to the results of the study, it was is concluded that ultimately the choice of an the approach to assessing the application of tax benefits, as well as methods and tools of analysis is determined by the available information base in open sources and access to non-public information. In addition, the reliability of the results of evaluation of the application of tax benefits substantially depends on compliance with the requirements and procedures during their implementation, in particular, the definition of objectives and, if necessary, the conditions of their granting, as well as the quality and the completeness of accounting of the provided benefits. The latter, as well as the availability of the necessary information and its disclosure is one of the main problems in assessing the application of tax benefits in countries with transition economy.
Keywords:tax benefits; effectiveness, efficiency and relative efficiency of tax benefits; model of the marginal effective tax rate; tax expenditures.
JEL: H21, H23, H30, G18
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 32 - 51) | Download | Downloads :764 |
REFERENCES ▼
doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00050-5
2. Roca, J. (2010). Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Tax Benefits. Discussion Paper, IDB-DP-136. Retrieved from publications.iadb.org/ publications/english/document/Evaluation-of-the-Effectiveness-and-Efficiency-of-Tax-Benefits.pdf
3. Bolnick, B. (2004, February). Effectiveness and Economic Impact of Tax Incentives in the SADC Region. Technical Report submitted to USAID/RCSA. Retrieved from www.nathaninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Effectiveness_and_Economic_Impact_of_Tax_Incentives_in_the_SADC_Region.pdf
4. Caiumi, A. (2011). The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tax Expenditures - A Novel Approach: An Application to the Regional Tax Incentives for Business Investments in Italy. OECD Taxation Working Papers, 5. doi.org/10.1787/5kg3h0trjmr8-en
5. Serebrians'kyj, D.M., Zhovner, V.V. (2014). Efficiency of income tax privileges and corporate profit tax in Ukraine. Visnyk Universytetu bankivs'koi spravy Natsional'noho banku Ukrainy – Bulletin of the University of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine, 1, 42-47 [in Ukrainian].
6. Ivanov, Ju., Majburov, I., Nazarenko, A. (2016). Methodological basis for assessing and modeling the effectiveness of tax benefits. Obshhestvo i jekonomika – Society and economics, 10, 80-96 [in Russian].
7. Busom, I. (1999). An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies. University of California, Berkeley, Burch Center Working Paper, B99/05. Retrieved from eml.berkeley.edu/~burch/rdsub.pdf;
doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.170561
8. Hall, B. Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 449-469. Retrieved from eml.berkeley.edu//~bhhall/papers/HallVanReenan%20RP00.pdf;
doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2
9. Parisi, M.L. Sembenelli, А. (2001, February 15). Is Private R&D Spending Sensitive to Its Price? Empirical Evidence on Panel Data for Italy. Retrieved from fmwww.bc.edu/EC-P/wp493.pdf;
doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.265394
10. Mulkay, B. Mairesse, J. (2003, February 14). The Effect of the R&D Tax Credit in France. Preliminary Draft. Retrieved from www.researchgate. net/publication/228602501_The_Effect_of_the_RD_Tax_Credit_in_France
11 Gonzalez, X. Jaumandreu, J. Pazo, С. (2005). Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(4), 930-950. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/24049332_Barriers_to_Innovation_and_Subsidy_Effectiveness
12. Duvigneau, J.С. Prasad, R.N. (1984). Guidelines for Calculating Financial and Economic Rates of Return for DFC Projects. World Bank Technical Report, 33. Retrieved from documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/5679914687 82148724/pdf/Guidelines-for-calculating-financial-and-economic-rates-of-return-for-DFC-projects.pdf
13. European Commission (2006, November 28). Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02006L0112-20201212&from=EN
14. European Commission (2003, June 2). Evaluation report on the experimental application of a reduced rate of VAT to certain labour-intensive services. Commission Staff Working Paper, COM (2003) 309 final. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/ files/resources/documents/evaluation_en.pdf
15. European Commission (2003, June 2). Experimental application of a reduced rate of VAT to certain labour-intensive services. Report from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament, COM (2003) 309 final. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2003/EN/1-2003-309-EN-F1-1.Pdf
16. European Commission (1999, October 22). Council Directive 1999/85/EC of 22 October 1999 amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the possibility of applying on an experiment basis a reduced VAT rate on labour-intensive services. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31999L0085
17. European Commission (2007, June 21). Study on reduced VAT applied to goods and services in the Member States of the European Union. Final report. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/resources/docu- ments/taxation/vat/how_vat_works/rates/study_reduced_vat.pdf
18. European Commission (2009, May 5). Council Directive 2009/47/EC of 5 May 2009 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards reduced rates of value added tax. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L: 2009:116:0018:0020:EN:PDF
№ 1/2022
1Research Financial Institute, State Educational and Scientific Institution "Academy of Financial Management"
THE BENCHMARK FOR VAT AND VAT EXPENDITURES IN UKRAINE: METHODOLOGICAL AND PRAGMATIC ASPECTS
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2022; 1:78-106 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.01.078 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Despite the preparation by the State Tax Service of Ukraine of Reports on tax reliefs that are a loss of budget revenues, which indicate certain steps towards the introduction of the concept of tax expenditures in the budget process, the question of their quality remains open due to the uncertainty of the principles of distribution of tax reliefs into those that are losses of budget revenues and other tax reliefs, and due to the algorithm for calculating budget losses from the provision of tax reliefs. In view of the above, the purpose of the article is to determine methodological approaches to the formation of Directories and, accordingly, Reports of the State Tax Service of Ukraine on tax reliefs (on the example of VAT reliefs), that are losses of budget revenues, and on other tax reliefs and justification of the guidelines for improving the quality of such reports.
Based on the analysis of concepts of benchmark tax system (tax) and tax expenditure and approaches to determining their main elements, the author formulates requirements for the structure of Directories of tax reliefs and Reports on tax reliefs, in particular, it is established that if the Directory of tax reliefs, which are losses of budget revenues should include only tax expenditures, then in the structure of the Directory of other tax incentives two components can be distinguished – "structural incentives", which are elements of the benchmark tax system, and special incentives that do not lead to the loss of budgetary revenues. In order to facilitate the identification and analysis, the main components of "structural VAT reliefs" in Ukraine, as well as types (groups) of reliefs that do not cause budget losses are identified, cases of unjustified classification of tax reliefs in the State Tax Service Directories are considered and proposals to change their classification are substantiated. Based on the calculations, it was identified which groups of reliefs predominate in the system of other reliefs, as well as in the reliefs that are losses of budget revenues.
According to the results of the study, it was concluded that the amount of "structural reliefs" of VAT in Ukraine is 4.5 times higher than the amount of tax expenditures, which, if necessary, can be considered as a reserve for increasing tax revenues to the state budget of Ukraine. The shortcomings of the systematic accounting of VAT reliefs in the Directories of tax reliefs have been identified and proposals aimed at improving the correctness and completeness of their accounting have been developed.
Keywords:benchmark tax system; tax expenditures, "structural reliefs", VAT reliefs, tax reliefs accounting, Directories of tax reliefs
JEL: H21, H25, H30, G18
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 78 - 106) | Download | Downloads :271 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Global tax expenditures database. Retrieved from gted.net/country-profile
3. Redonda, A., Von Haldenwang, C. (2021, 16 June). Tax expenditures: The hidden side of government spending. VoxEU. Retrieved from: voxeu.org/article/tax-expenditures-hidden-side-government-spending
4. Resolution of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 1233 on December, 2010 "On approval of the Procedure for accounting for amounts of taxes and fees not paid by the business entity to the budget in connection with the receipt of tax reliefs". Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1233-2010-%D0%BF#Text [In Ukrainian]
5. Heady, C., Mansour, М. (2019). Tax Expenditure Reporting and Its Use in Fiscal Management: A Guide for Developing Economies. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Publications/Fiscal-Affairs-Department-How-To-Notes/Issues/2019/03/27/Tax-Expenditure-Reporting-and-Its-Use-in-Fiscal-Management-A-Guide-for-Developing-Economies-46676
6. Sugin, L. (1998). Tax Expenditure Analysis and Constitutional Decisions. Retrieved from ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/57/
7. Fleming, J.C., Peroni, R.J. (2010). Can Tax Expenditure Analysis Be Divorced from a Normative Tax Base: A Critique of the "New Paradigm" and its Denouement. Virginia Tax Review, 30, 135-180. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1674544
8. Palisi, P. (2017). Tax expenditure analysis - origins, debates and future prospects. Retrieved from treasury.gov.au/publication/tax-expenditure-analysis-origins-debates-and-future-prospects
9. Altshuler, R., Dietz, R.D. (2008). Tax expenditure estimation and reporting: A critical review. NBER Working Paper 14263. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1248924;
doi.org/10.3386/w14263
10. Burman, L.E., Phaup, M. (2011). Tax expenditures, the size and efficiency of government, and implications for budget reform. NBER Working Paper 17268. Retrieved from www.urban.org/sites/default/ files/publication/27696/413130-Tax-Expenditures-the-Size-and-Efficiency-of-Government-and-Implications-for-Budget-Reform.PDF;
doi.org/10.3386/w17268
11. Craig, J., Allan, W. (2002). Fiscal Transparency, Tax Expenditures, and Budget Processes: An International Perspective. NTA Papers and Proceedings. Retrieved from: www.estimacionestributarias.com/archivos/ Gastos%20tributarios.%20Craig%20and%20Allan.pdf
12. Kraan, D.-J. (2004). Off-budget and tax expenditures. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(1), 121-142. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/gov/ budgeting/39515114.pdf;
doi.org/10.1787/budget-v4-art6-en
13. Laporte, В., Caldeira, Е., C. de Quatrebarbes, Bouterige, Y. (2018). Tax Expenditure Assessment: From Principles to Practice. Methodological guide. Retrieved from ferdi.fr/dl/df-PSDXZuxEEh8LihnEhHUoFkjx/tax-expenditure-assessment-from-principles-to-practice-methodological-guide.pdf
14. Hashimzade, N., Heady, C., Myles, G., Oats, L., Scharf, K., Yousefi, H. (2014). The Definition, Measurement, and Evaluation of Tax Expenditures and Tax Reliefs. Technical paper prepared for the National Audit Office. Retrieved from ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/ 16391/TARC_ Tax_Expenditures_and_tax_reliefs_09-07-14.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
15. Villela, L., Lemgruber, А., Jorratt, М. (2010). Tax Expenditure Budgets. Concepts and Challenges for Implementation. Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper Series, IDB-WP-131. Retrieved from idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35170590
16. Burton, M., Stewart, M. (2011). Promoting budget transparency through tax expenditure management: a report on country experience for civil society advocates. Melbourne Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, 544. Retrieved from poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID= 293089090070115014031064014031089098004008058002025032090123114097083028086080091112122000022099013026035123090082093085117069059076021059086066092015024092102126077047095008089029020090107111066127020109113005072094065097068010098118119102008084024&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE;
doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1864324
17. Kassim, L., Mansour, М. (2018). Tax expenditures reporting in developing countries: An evaluation. Revue d'économie du développement, 26: 2. Retrieved from www.cairn-int.info/article-E_EDD_322_0113--tax-expenditures-reporting-in.htm
18. OECD. (2010). Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries. Retrieved from www.ciat.org/Biblioteca/AreasTematicas/Economia/GastoTributario/2010_tax_expenditure_countries_oecd.pdf; doi.org/10.1787/9789264076907-en
19. Sokolovska, А.M. (Ed.). (2006). The system of tax reliefs in Ukraine in the context of European experience. Kyiv: Research Financial Institute. [in Ukrainian].
20. Mayburov, I.A., & Ivanov, Y.B. (Eds.). (2014). Tax reliefs. Theory and practice of application. Moscow: UNITY-DANA [in Russian].
21. Mayburov, I.A. (2013). Evaluation of tax expenditures and tax effectiveness: methodology of problem solving. Obshchestvo i ekonomika – Society and Economics, 4, 71-91. Retrieved from elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19132879 [in Ukrainian]
22. Sokolovska, А.M., Petrakov, Y.V. (2013). The concept of tax expenditures and the ways of its application in Ukraine. Finansy Ukrainy – Finance of Ukraine, 11, 23-44. Retrieved from finukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&aid=639 [in Ukrainian].
23. Ivanov, Y., Mayburov, I., Nazarenko, A. (2016). Methodological basis of assessment and modeling of the tax incentives efficiency. Obshchestvo i ekonomika – Society and Economics, 10, 80-96 [in Russian].
24. Surrey, S., McDaniel, P.R. (1979). The Tax Expenditure Concept: Current Developments And Emerging Issues,. 20: 2, 225-369. Retrieved from lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1605&context= bclr
25. OECD. (2004). Best Practice Guidelines – Off Budget and Tax Expenditures. 25th Annual Meeting of Senior Budget Official. Retrieved from www.resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/OECD%20Off-Budget%20&%20Tax%20Expenditures%20Guidelines.pdf
26. Chapman, L.F., McKenzie, K., Porter, S., Lindsay, T. (2017, July). Tax Policy Forum: Review of Tax Expenditures, Budget 2016. MPRA Paper, 96926. Retrieved from mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/96926/1/MPRA_paper_96926.pdf
27. Caiumi, A. (2011). The Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tax Expenditures - A Novel Approach: An Application to the Regional Tax Incentives for Business Investments in Italy. OECD Taxation Working Papers. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/254439340_The_Evaluation_of_the_Effectiveness_of_Tax_Expenditures_-_A_Novel_Approach_An_Application_to_the_Regional_Tax_Incentives_for_Business_Investments_in_Italy/link/5facfed4a6fdcc9389ab4629/download
28. Order of the State Tax Administration of Ukraine, the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine № 419/453 on July, 2004 "Rules of accounting for value added tax to improve the calculation of the value of the impact of reliefs from this tax on the formation of the revenue side of the State Budget of Ukraine". Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0939-04/ed20040723#Text [in Ukrainian].
29. De La Feria, R., Krever, R. (2013). Ending VAT Exemptions: Towards a Post-Modern VAT. VAT Exemptions: Consequences and Design Alternatives. Wolters Kluwer. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/303863105_Ending_VAT_Exemptions_Towards_a_Post-Modern_VAT
30. Sokolovska, А.M. (Ed.). (2017). Tax harmonization in Ukraine in the context of the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union. Kyiv: SESE "The Academy of Financial Management". doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.093 [in Ukrainian].
№ 2/2023
1Research Financial Institute, State Educational and Scientific Institution "Academy of Financial Management"
The rates of budget-forming taxes in Ukraine: is a radical reduction advisable?
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2023; 2:66-91 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2023.02.066 |
ABSTRACT ▼
In the context of Russian Federation's full-scale war against Ukraine, the idea of conducting a radical tax reform in our country, which would provide for the establishment of corporate income tax, personal income tax and VAT rates at the same level of 10%, has become widespread, and later transformed into the idea of an "anti-corruption" tax reform. According to the reform’s supporters, lowering the rates of the main taxes will ensure the de-shadowing of the economy, destroy the grounds for corruption, and on this basis will lead to an increase in tax revenues, if not in the first year of the reform, then at least in the short term.
Optimistic forecasts regarding the fiscal consequences of a radical reduction in the rates of main taxes in Ukraine are based on simplified ideas about the impact of the size of tax rates on the scale of the shadow economy and tax revenues. The purpose of the article is to refute these ideas by revealing, using the results of theoretical and empirical studies, the ambiguous nature of the relationship between tax rates and the size of the shadow economy and tax revenues.
A comparative analysis of the rates of VAT, personal income tax, corporative income tax and social security contributions in Ukraine and the EU countries has been carried out, which allows to establish that none of the EU countries has ever introduced low rates for all major taxes and social security contributions, reduced the VAT rate to the level of minimum EU requirements (15%), or refused to finance pension payments through social security contributions, distributing their burden between employers and employees. The author analyzes the impact of tax rates, tax burden and other factors on the level of the shadow economy and establishes why lower tax rates do not guarantee a reduction in the scale of informal activities. The absence of a direct link between the size of tax rates and corruption is substantiated. Based on the analysis of the arithmetic and economic effects of tax rate cuts, the author determines their ambiguous impact on tax revenues. A comparative analysis has been made of the fiscal efficiency of the taxes whose rates are proposed to be reduced and of the compensating taxes, and the impossibility of compensating budget losses by increasing these taxes is substantiated. The author concludes about the high fiscal risks of a radical reduction in the rates of budget-forming taxes in general and the impossibility of such a reduction during the war.
Keywords:tax reform; tax rates; social security contributions; shadow economy; effects of tax rate cuts
JEL: H21, H26, H71, H55, K34
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 66 - 91) | Download | Downloads :199 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Interfax-UKRAINE (2023, January 11). Experts: Ukraine needs tax reform to ensure success of post-war recovery. Retrieved from interfax.com.ua/news/general/883723.html [in Ukrainian].
3. Dlihach, A. (2022, December 28). The tax policy of the state in 2022 was devastating. Retrieved from gmk.center/ua/opinion/podatkova-politika-derzhavi-u-2022-roci-bula-rujnivnoj [in Ukrainian].
4. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1998). Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy. American Economic Review. Retrieved from web.worldbank.org/archive/website00818/WEB/PDF/UNOFFICI.PDF
5. Cristea, L.А., Vodă, A.D., Ciocanea, B., Luca, M. (2020). Is the Tax Burden a Generating Factor of Fiscal Evasion in South-East Europe? KnE Social Sciences, 4 (1), 153-169. Retrieved from knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/5986
6. Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Labton, P. (2000). Dodging the Grabbing Hand: The Determinants of Unofficial Activity in 69 Countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 459-493. doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00093-6
7. Hetemі, A., Konxheli, D., Gulhan, O., et al. (2018). Factors of the Shadow Economy in the Republic of Albania. EuroEconomica, 37(3). Retrieved from URL: www.zbw.eu/econis-archiv/bitstream/11159/2597/1/1046201174.pdf
8. Schneider, F. (2009). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy in Germany, Austria and Other OECD-Countries: Some Preliminary Findings. Revue économique, 60 (5),1079-1116. doi.org/10.3917/reco.605.1079
9. Laffer, A. (2004). The Laffer curve: past, present, and future. Retrieved from www.heritage.org/taxes/report/the-laffer-curve-past-present-and-future
10. Brill, A., Hassett, K.A. (2007). Revenue-Maximizing Corporate Income Taxes: The Laffer Curve in OECD Countries. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Working paper, 137. Retrieved from www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/20070731_Corplaffer7_31_07.pdf
11. Kawano, L., Slemrod, J. (2015). How Do Corporate Tax Bases Change When Corporate Tax Rates Change? With Implications for the Tax Rate Elasticity of Corporate Tax Revenues. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2559858; doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2559858
12. Karas, M. (2012). Tax Rate to maximize the revenue: Laffer curve for the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(4), 189-194. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/265964563_Tax_rate_to_maximize_the_revenue_Laffer_curve_for_the_Czech_Republic/link/54295fbf0cf238c6ea7dcf88/download;
doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260040189
13. Trabandt, M., Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer Curve Revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58, 305-327. Retrieved from home.uchicago.edu/~huhlig/papers/uhlig.trabandt.jme.2011.pdf; doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.07.003
14. European Commission (2022). Taxation trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway (2022 ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f85da28f-f5be-11ec-b976-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
15. KPMG (n.d.). Highest employer social security rates. Retrieved from kpmg.com/sg/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/social-security-employer-tax-rates-table.html
16. Trading economics (n.d.). Social Security Rate for Employees. Indicators. Retrieved from tradingeconomics.com/country-list/social-security-rate-for-employees
17. European Commission (n.d.). Data on Taxation. Retrieved from: taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation-1/economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en
18. Moore Global (2018). Doing business in Romania 2018. Moore Global guide. Retrieved from www.moore-global.com/MediaLibsAndFiles/media/MooreStephens/Documents/Doing%20business%20guides/DBI-Romania-2018_final.pdf?ext=.pdf
19. EUR-Lex (2022). Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 of 14 December 2022 on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2523/oj
20. Vovk, T., Vodiannikov, O., Konovalenko, I. (2005). Tax aspects of WTO law and EU acquis. Guidelines for tax reform in Ukraine. Kharkiv: Konsum [in Ukrainian].
21. Schneider, F., Buehn, A. (2016). Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions. IZA Discussion Paper, 9820. Retrieved from ftp.iza.org/dp9820.pdf; doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2750303
22. Schneider, F., Enste, D. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77-114. doi.org/doi: 10.1257/jel.38.1.77
23. Navickas, M., Juščius, V., Navickas, V. (2019). Determinants of Shadow Economy in Eastern European Countries. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66(1), 1–14. Retrieved from saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/402; doi.org/10.2478/saeb-2019-0002
24. Igudia, E., Ackrill, R., Coleman, S., Dobson, C. (2016). Determinants of the informal economy of an emerging economy: a multiple indicator, multiple causes approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(2/3). doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.076643
25. Schneider, F. (2016). Estimating the size of the shadow economies of highly-developed countries: selected new results. CESifo DICE Report, 14(4), 44-53. Retrieved from www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/167285/1/ifo-dice-report-v14-y2016-i4-p44-53.pdf
26. Ungureanu, M.A., Calugareanu, M., Caraus, А.-M. (2016). Conceptual approaches to tax evasion in Romania. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 11(3), 7-14. Retrieved from ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v11y2016i3p7-14.html
27. Schneider, F., Asllani, А. (2022). Taxation of the Informal Economy in the EU. Manuscript. European Union. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/734007/IPOL_STU(2022)734007_EN.pdf
28. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (n.d.). Informally employed population by types of economic activity. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
29. European Commission (2014). Taxation trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway (2014 ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/report.pdf
30. European Commission (2019). Taxation trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway (2019 ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-07/taxation_trends_report_2019.pdf
31. European Commission (2017, November 16). European Pillar of Social Rights. Retrieved from commission.europa.eu/publications/european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |