English
Русский 
Ukrainian 
| HOME PAGE | |
№ 2023/2
1Research Financial Institute, State Educational and Scientific Institution "Academy of Financial Management"
The rates of budget-forming taxes in Ukraine: is a radical reduction advisable?
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2023; 2:66-91 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2023.02.066 |
ABSTRACT ▼
In the context of Russian Federation's full-scale war against Ukraine, the idea of conducting a radical tax reform in our country, which would provide for the establishment of corporate income tax, personal income tax and VAT rates at the same level of 10%, has become widespread, and later transformed into the idea of an "anti-corruption" tax reform. According to the reform’s supporters, lowering the rates of the main taxes will ensure the de-shadowing of the economy, destroy the grounds for corruption, and on this basis will lead to an increase in tax revenues, if not in the first year of the reform, then at least in the short term.
Optimistic forecasts regarding the fiscal consequences of a radical reduction in the rates of main taxes in Ukraine are based on simplified ideas about the impact of the size of tax rates on the scale of the shadow economy and tax revenues. The purpose of the article is to refute these ideas by revealing, using the results of theoretical and empirical studies, the ambiguous nature of the relationship between tax rates and the size of the shadow economy and tax revenues.
A comparative analysis of the rates of VAT, personal income tax, corporative income tax and social security contributions in Ukraine and the EU countries has been carried out, which allows to establish that none of the EU countries has ever introduced low rates for all major taxes and social security contributions, reduced the VAT rate to the level of minimum EU requirements (15%), or refused to finance pension payments through social security contributions, distributing their burden between employers and employees. The author analyzes the impact of tax rates, tax burden and other factors on the level of the shadow economy and establishes why lower tax rates do not guarantee a reduction in the scale of informal activities. The absence of a direct link between the size of tax rates and corruption is substantiated. Based on the analysis of the arithmetic and economic effects of tax rate cuts, the author determines their ambiguous impact on tax revenues. A comparative analysis has been made of the fiscal efficiency of the taxes whose rates are proposed to be reduced and of the compensating taxes, and the impossibility of compensating budget losses by increasing these taxes is substantiated. The author concludes about the high fiscal risks of a radical reduction in the rates of budget-forming taxes in general and the impossibility of such a reduction during the war.
Keywords:tax reform; tax rates; social security contributions; shadow economy; effects of tax rate cuts
JEL: H21, H26, H71, H55, K34
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 66 - 91) | Download | Downloads :61 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Interfax-UKRAINE (2023, January 11). Experts: Ukraine needs tax reform to ensure success of post-war recovery. Retrieved from interfax.com.ua/news/general/883723.html [in Ukrainian].
3. Dlihach, A. (2022, December 28). The tax policy of the state in 2022 was devastating. Retrieved from gmk.center/ua/opinion/podatkova-politika-derzhavi-u-2022-roci-bula-rujnivnoj [in Ukrainian].
4. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1998). Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy. American Economic Review. Retrieved from web.worldbank.org/archive/website00818/WEB/PDF/UNOFFICI.PDF
5. Cristea, L.А., Vodă, A.D., Ciocanea, B., Luca, M. (2020). Is the Tax Burden a Generating Factor of Fiscal Evasion in South-East Europe? KnE Social Sciences, 4 (1), 153-169. Retrieved from knepublishing.com/index.php/KnE-Social/article/view/5986
6. Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Labton, P. (2000). Dodging the Grabbing Hand: The Determinants of Unofficial Activity in 69 Countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 459-493. doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00093-6
7. Hetemі, A., Konxheli, D., Gulhan, O., et al. (2018). Factors of the Shadow Economy in the Republic of Albania. EuroEconomica, 37(3). Retrieved from URL: www.zbw.eu/econis-archiv/bitstream/11159/2597/1/1046201174.pdf
8. Schneider, F. (2009). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy in Germany, Austria and Other OECD-Countries: Some Preliminary Findings. Revue économique, 60 (5),1079-1116. doi.org/10.3917/reco.605.1079
9. Laffer, A. (2004). The Laffer curve: past, present, and future. Retrieved from www.heritage.org/taxes/report/the-laffer-curve-past-present-and-future
10. Brill, A., Hassett, K.A. (2007). Revenue-Maximizing Corporate Income Taxes: The Laffer Curve in OECD Countries. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Working paper, 137. Retrieved from www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/20070731_Corplaffer7_31_07.pdf
11. Kawano, L., Slemrod, J. (2015). How Do Corporate Tax Bases Change When Corporate Tax Rates Change? With Implications for the Tax Rate Elasticity of Corporate Tax Revenues. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2559858; doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2559858
12. Karas, M. (2012). Tax Rate to maximize the revenue: Laffer curve for the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(4), 189-194. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/265964563_Tax_rate_to_maximize_the_revenue_Laffer_curve_for_the_Czech_Republic/link/54295fbf0cf238c6ea7dcf88/download;
doi.org/10.11118/actaun201260040189
13. Trabandt, M., Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer Curve Revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58, 305-327. Retrieved from home.uchicago.edu/~huhlig/papers/uhlig.trabandt.jme.2011.pdf; doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.07.003
14. European Commission (2022). Taxation trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway (2022 ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f85da28f-f5be-11ec-b976-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
15. KPMG (n.d.). Highest employer social security rates. Retrieved from kpmg.com/sg/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/social-security-employer-tax-rates-table.html
16. Trading economics (n.d.). Social Security Rate for Employees. Indicators. Retrieved from tradingeconomics.com/country-list/social-security-rate-for-employees
17. European Commission (n.d.). Data on Taxation. Retrieved from: taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation-1/economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en
18. Moore Global (2018). Doing business in Romania 2018. Moore Global guide. Retrieved from www.moore-global.com/MediaLibsAndFiles/media/MooreStephens/Documents/Doing%20business%20guides/DBI-Romania-2018_final.pdf?ext=.pdf
19. EUR-Lex (2022). Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 of 14 December 2022 on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2523/oj
20. Vovk, T., Vodiannikov, O., Konovalenko, I. (2005). Tax aspects of WTO law and EU acquis. Guidelines for tax reform in Ukraine. Kharkiv: Konsum [in Ukrainian].
21. Schneider, F., Buehn, A. (2016). Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions. IZA Discussion Paper, 9820. Retrieved from ftp.iza.org/dp9820.pdf; doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2750303
22. Schneider, F., Enste, D. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77-114. doi.org/doi: 10.1257/jel.38.1.77
23. Navickas, M., Juščius, V., Navickas, V. (2019). Determinants of Shadow Economy in Eastern European Countries. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66(1), 1–14. Retrieved from saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/402; doi.org/10.2478/saeb-2019-0002
24. Igudia, E., Ackrill, R., Coleman, S., Dobson, C. (2016). Determinants of the informal economy of an emerging economy: a multiple indicator, multiple causes approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 28(2/3). doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2016.076643
25. Schneider, F. (2016). Estimating the size of the shadow economies of highly-developed countries: selected new results. CESifo DICE Report, 14(4), 44-53. Retrieved from www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/167285/1/ifo-dice-report-v14-y2016-i4-p44-53.pdf
26. Ungureanu, M.A., Calugareanu, M., Caraus, А.-M. (2016). Conceptual approaches to tax evasion in Romania. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 11(3), 7-14. Retrieved from ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v11y2016i3p7-14.html
27. Schneider, F., Asllani, А. (2022). Taxation of the Informal Economy in the EU. Manuscript. European Union. Retrieved from www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/734007/IPOL_STU(2022)734007_EN.pdf
28. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (n.d.). Informally employed population by types of economic activity. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
29. European Commission (2014). Taxation trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway (2014 ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/report.pdf
30. European Commission (2019). Taxation trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway (2019 ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-07/taxation_trends_report_2019.pdf
31. European Commission (2017, November 16). European Pillar of Social Rights. Retrieved from commission.europa.eu/publications/european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en
Events calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
