№ 2020/3
DiscussionsSHVETSʹ Serhiy Mykhailovych1
1State Institution «Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine»
Modeling the impact of public debt on economic growth in Ukraine
ABSTRACT ▼
The study considers modeling approaches to determine the relationship between the level of public debt and economic growth. Empirical evidence for the positive, neutral, and negative correlation between the indicators arrive in a nonlinear function in the form of inverted U-curve, whose theoretical argumentation is associated with the implementation of the golden rule of public finance.
To verify the empirical evidence on the example of Ukraine’s economy, the author provides a scenario assessment based on the constructed econometric model of fiscal-monetary interaction. The results of modeling confirm the existence of a relationship that corresponds to a second-order polynomial trend. The maximum level of public debt, above which the GDP rate declines, is 63.8%, and the critical level of public debt, at which the rate of economic growth changes to negative, is 87.4%. As the development of Ukraine’s economy is approaching the upper limit of the determined functional entry, to accelerate growth, it is necessary to focus the limited resource of public debt to finance large-scale infrastructure projects with a high capital return.
Keywords:growth, debt threshold, fiscal-monetary interaction, scenario modeling, econometric macro model
JEL: O41, H63, E63, C32
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 146 - 156) | Download | Downloads :460 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Wagner, A. (1893). Grundlegung der politischen okonomie [text and handbook of political economy]. Leipzig, Germany: C. F. Winter.
2. Abbas, S. & Christensen, J. (2007). The role of domestic debt markets in economic growth. An empirical investigation for low-income countries and emerging markets. IMF Working Papers, 07/127.
doi.org/10.5089/9781451866919.001
3. Arčabić, V., Tica, J., Lee, J. & Sonora, R. (2018). Public debt and economic growth conundrum: nonlinearity and inter-temporal relationship. Studies in nonlinear dynamics & econometrics, De Gruyter, 22(1), 1-20.
doi.org/10.1515/snde-2016-0086
4. Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of financial economics, 5, 147-175.
doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
5. Swamy, Vighneswara (2019). Debt and growth: Decomposing the cause and effect relationship. International journal of finance and economics, 1-16.
doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1729
6. Jacobs, J., Ogawa, K., Sterken, E. & Tokutsu, I. (2019). Public debt, economic growth and the real interest rate: a panel VAR approach to EU and OECD countries. Applied Economics.
doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1673301
7. Reinhart, C. & Rogoff, K. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100, 573-578.
doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573
8. Checherita-Westphal, C. & Rother, P. (2010). The impact of high and growing government debt on economic growth: an empirical investigation for the euro area. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1237.
9. Checherita-Westphal, C., Rother, P. & Hughes Hallett, A. (2012). Fiscal sustainability using growth-maximising debt targets. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1472.
10. Greiner, A. (2013). Debt and growth: Is there a non-monotonic relation? Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, 33(1), 340-347.
11. Liu, Z., Lyu, J. (2020). Public debt and economic growth: threshold effect and its influence factors. Applied Economics Letters, 27(3).
doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1740157
12. Karadam, D. (2018). An investigation of nonlinear effects of debt on growth. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 18, e00097.
doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2018.e00097
13. Walsh, C. (2010). Monetary theory and policy. The MIT Press.
14. Wray, L. (1953). Modern money theory: a primer on macroeconomics for sovereign monetary. University of Missouri-Kansas City, US.
15. Shvets, S. (2017). Internal public debt and economic growth: the case study of Ukraine. Public and Municipal Finance, 6(4), 23-32.
doi.org/10.21511/pmf.06(4).2017.03
English
Русский 
Ukrainian 
