№ 2017/1
Economics of agriculture
YAROVYI Victor 1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Institutional environment for agricultural land use: towards adaptive and social efficiency
ABSTRACT ▼
This paper analyses the institutional framework to develop an effective agricultural land use system in Ukraine. The analysis aims to determine the efficiency of the national institutional system and justify the ways to improve it. The methodological approach is based on the principles of structural functionalism.
It is proved, that existing institutional system realizes its coordinating function in such a way that leads to institutional gaps between formal and informal property institutions, a backlog of the informal institutions and "shadow" land relations. As to the distributive function, it leads to structural imbalances, dominance of corporate over private interests, and dominance of agricultural production over rural development. This is an indicator of an institutional dysfunction, which means the failure to adapt, a mismatch between the formal and informal norms and nowadays challenges for sustainable agricultural and rural development. This is also an indicator that the institutional system of land relations is oriented to ensure the allocative efficiency while the adaptive efficiency remains at a low level. To enhance the adaptive efficiency, it is necessary to implement the following policy mechanisms:
- In order to overcome institutional gaps, it is necessary to introduce positive selective incentives for the development of informal institutions, and prioritize the development of inter-group social capital with confidence and social interactions between different social groups (officials, rural communities, land users);
- In order to overcome the institutional imbalances, it is necessary to prioritize both social and ecological components in the development of the national land use system, and the interests of small landowners and family farms.
To ensure that agricultural land use is socially oriented and provide the adaptive efficiency of the institutional environment, it is necessary to harmonize the formal, informal and control institutions.
Keywords: institutional environment, agricultural land use, adaptive efficiency, social efficiency
JEL: Q15
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 44 - 57) | Download | Downloads :817 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Insight Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from
www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/ TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2016-2017_FINAL.pdf
2. Moldavan, L.V. Contradictions of the land reform in Ukraine's agrarian sector in the context of the world practice. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and Forecasting, 2, 148-159 [in Ukrainian].
3. Heyets, V.M., Borodina, O.M., Prokopa, I.V. (Eds). (2012). Ukrainian model of the agrarian development and its reorientation. Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv. Retrieved from
www.dnsgb.com.ua/files/nauk_dop_2w.pdf [in Ukrainian].
4. Borodina, O.M., Prokopa, I.V. (2016). The village and peasantry at the juncture of opportunities and the crossroad of hope. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and Forecasting, 2, 132-147 [in Ukrainian].
5. North, D. and Thomas, R. (1997). The first economic revolution. Economic History Review, XXX, 2, 229-241.
6. Yurchyshyn, V.V. (2009). Agrarian revolutions in Ukraine in the context of epoch changes: origin and essence. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 3, 45-57 [in Ukrainian].
7. Merton, R.K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
8. North, D.C. (1997). The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics to an Understanding of the Transition Problem. WIDER Annual Lecture 001. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. Retrieved from
www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/AL01-1997.pdf
9. Yurchyshyn, V.V. (2009). Agrarian policy in Ukraine at the epochs' turning point: historical, social and economical essays. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
10. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:
doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678