№ 2016/2
Creative discussions on systemic problems of social developmentGRYTSENKO Andrii Andriyovych 1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Ukraine's economy on the road to inclusive development
ABSTRACT ▼
On the basis of logico-historical methodology, the article reveals the peculiar features Ukraine's economic development since gaining independence. It is shown that the major historical collisions are determined by the logic of jointly-divided labor, which manifests itself in different historical relationship (market and state, capitalization and socialization, liberalism and socialism, globalization and localization), and at present takes the form of the problem of inclusion of certain elements of socio-economic system in the overall process of social development.
The author specifies the factors that caused the peculiarities the market oriented transformation of Ukraine's economy, its inversion nature and basis distortions. Separated the systemic and fragmentary inclusivity, whose reverse side is the social exclusivity that emerges from precarisation. The author justifies the necessity to fill the idea of independence with positive achievements in the context of revealing and realizing this country's internal potential and transition to inclusive development.
Keywords: independence, jointly-divided labor, general historical logic, inversion type of market transformation, economic sovereignty, competitiveness, fragmentary and systemic inclusivity, social exclusivity, prevarication, inclusive development
JEL: A13
Article in English (pp. 7 - 20) | Download | Downloads :1099 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Il'enkov, Je. V. (1984). What is personality. Retrieved from
www.bellabs.ru/Books/Person/Um-2.html [in Russian].
2. Hrytsenko, A. (2014). Institutional economics: the subject, methodology, content. Saarbrucken/Deutschland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing [in Russian].
3. Heyets, V. M. (2009). Society, state, economy, phenomenology cooperation and development. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
4. Grinberg, R. S., Rubinshtejn, A. Ja. (2013). The individual & state: economic dilemma. Moscow: Ves' mir [in Russian].
5. Marks, K. (1960). Capital, 1. In Jengel's, F., Marks, K. Writing (2nd edition), 23 (pp. 113–114). Moscow [in Russian].
6. Molchanov, K. V. (2009). Systemic understanding of economic sovereignty in modern political economy. In Economic sovereignty and sovereign economy (p. 159). Moscow: MAKS Press [in Russian].
7. Zhalilo, Ya. A., Pokryshka, D. S. (2011). The economic principles of state sovereignty in a globalized world. In The independence of Ukraine in a globalized world: the vectors of the twentieth century. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
8. Zveriakov, M. I. (2015). Change of model of economic development. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 6, 44 [in Ukrainian].
9. Hrytsenko, A. (12 November, 1994). Inversion economy, laws and policies. Uriadovyi kurier, 175 [in Ukrainian].
10. Foundation for Promotion of health protection and social justice named Andrew Rylkova. Retrieved from
rylkov-fond.org/blog/novosti/confa/ [in Ukrainian].
11. Precarious work. Retrieved from
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ [in Russian].
12. What is the "precariat". Retrieved from
znajkino.ru/chto_takoe_prekariat.htm [in Russian].
13. Inclusive education. Retrieved from:
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ [in Russian].
14. Research Center for International Development Assistance. Retrieved from
www.rcicd.org/glossary/inclusive-development/ [in Russian].
15. The Growth Report. Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development (2009). Published for the World Bank. Moscow: Ves' Mir [in Russian].
16. Newspaper russian.people. Retrieved from
russian.people.com.cn/31518/7346801.html [in Russian].
17. Birjukov, A. (2011). Inclusive development in the context of global revolutions. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 12, 80–81 [in Russian].
18. Hrytsenko, A. (11 March, 2016). The manifesto of the liberal-socialist movement. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].