№ 2015/2
Economy under the conditions of modern transformations
BULANA Oleksandra 1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Transfer pricing and customs valuation: differences and avoiding potential risks
ABSTRACT ▼
Tax issues pertaining to cross-border trade in goods between related parties (i.e., companies from the same group) represent a major challenge for many national tax and customs administrations. One of the biggest concerns is how to determine the fair market price for such operations. The methodology for determining the tax base depends on the type of tax concerned – i.e., transfer pricing methods for corporate income tax and customs valuation methods for indirect taxes. The two approaches have considerable differences, that may result in negative implications for the fiscal authorities (tax evasion) and taxpayers (disputes with the fiscal authorities, overpaid tax). The article highlights the main differences between the methods of transfer pricing and customs valuation. The author analyzes the recent Ukrainian legal changes pertaining to control over transfer pricing. The author describes potential risks for taxpayers and the areas that require settlement by the customs authorities in relation with the new transfer pricing regulations in Ukraine. The main achievement of this research is development of recommendations for harmonization of transfer pricing and customs valuation in Ukraine, inter alia considering international best practices.
Keywords: transfer pricing, customs valuation, usual price, import of goods
JEL: H25
Article in English (pp. 59 - 71) | Download | Downloads :785 |
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 59 - 71) | Download | Downloads :696 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. OECD, WTO, UNCTAD. Implications of Global Value Chains for Trade, Investment, Development and Jobs (2013). Prepared for the G-20 Leaders Summit Saint Petersburg (Russian Federation) September 2013. Retrieved from
www.oecd.org/sti/ind/G20-Global-Value-Chains-2013.pdf
2. Blouin, J., Robinson, L., Seidman, J. (2011). Coordination of transfer prices on intra-firm trade. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania, University of Texas, and Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. Retrieved from
www.quant.jobs/sites/default/files/Business_Taxation/Events/conferences/symposia/2011/blouin.pdf
3. OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations 2010. Retrieved from
www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/oecd-transfer-pricing-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-and-tax-administrations-2010_tpg-2010-en
4. The agreement on implementation of article VII of the General agreement on tariffs and trade from 15.04.1994 (ukr/rus). International paper. Retrieved from
zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_011 [in Ukrainian].
5. Marsilla, S. I. Towards customs valuation compliance through corporate income tax Customs valuation and transfer pricing. World Customs Journal, 5 (1). Retrieved from
www.worldcustomsjournal.org/media/wcj/-2011/1/Marsilla.pdf
6. Canada Border Service Agency. Memorandum D13-3-6. Income Tax Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation (2006). Retrieved from
www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d13/d13-3-6-eng.html
7. Australian Customs and Border Protection Service. Instruction and Guideline. Customs Valuation Refers to practice statement 2009/01 (2011). Retrieved from
www.customs.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/PS200901-ig-Valuation.pdf
8. Lee, J.Y, Ahn, W.G., Sung, Ch. (2008). Customs APA: Introduction of Advanced Customs Valuation Arrangement. International Transfer Pricing Journal, 15 (3), 159-161. Retrieved from
www.ibfd.org/IBFD-Products/Journal-Articles/International-Transfer-Pricing-Journal/collections/itpj/pdf/itpj030806.pdf
9. KPMG Global Transfer Pricing Review. Russia (2013). Retrieved from
www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/global-transfer-pricing-review/Documents/russia.pdf
10. WCO Commentary 23.1 (acceptability of TP study for customs valuation purposes. Retrieved from
www.us.kpmg.com/microsite/taxnewsflash/tp/2011/WCO-Commentary_23.1.pdf
11. WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. Ministerial Conference Ninth Session Bali, 3-6 December 2013. WT/MIN(13)/36. WT/L/911. Retrieved from
mc9.wto.org/draft-bali-ministerial-declaration#trade_facilitation
12. Bulana, O.O. (2014). Harmonization of transfer pricing and customs valuation of goods. Finansy Ukrainy – Finance of Ukraine, 4, 83-93.
13. Deloitte. The link between transfer pricing and customs valuation – 2015 Country Guide. Retrieved from
www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-link-between-transfer-pricing-customs-valuation-2015.pdf
14. Bakker, A., Obuoforibo, B. (2009). Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation: Two Worlds to Tax as One. IBFD. Retrieved from
books.google.com.ua/books?id=IvluN7KyiawC&printsec=frontcover&hl=uk#v=onepage&q&f=false
15. Abad, L. A., Capri, A., Fabio, M., Dubois, M. (2013). A Global View: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Through a Customs Lens. KPMG. Retrieved from:
www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/taxnewsflash/Documents/tp-apr8-2013.pdf
16. Canadian Customs Notice permits duty refund claims on transfer pricing downward adjustments and creates new reporting requirements. Retrieved from
www.ey.com/GL/en/Services/Tax/International-Tax/Alert--Canadian-Customs-Notice-permits-duty-refund-claims-on-transfer-pricing-downward-adjustments-and-creates-new-reporting-requirements