№ 2014/2
Economics of agriculture
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Integration of small agricultural producers to the agro-food chains of value added: methodological approaches and empirical research
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2014; 2:73-84 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author proves that the growth in Ukraine's agrarian sector is followed by a market concentration with a small number of powerful agro-industrial corporations controlling a considerable part of this country's agro-food system. At the same time, the small producers and processors have a weak market power and are crowded out from the profitable markets. The article shows that the conceptual approaches to the solution of this problem are based on the search for ways to their integration, on a parity basis, into the chains of value added existing in the corporate sector. The author justifies that agro-industrial chains – are not only interrelated links of the production process, but, first of all, mu-tually beneficial ties between groups of producers, sellers, processors and service companies, who unite in order to increase productivity and create value added based on the understanding of mutual profit and fair distribution of the obtained results. Those objectives could be attained through better economic coordination and institutional innovations. Research on the agro-food chain makes it possible to assess the relations between all actors and promotes the understanding of all possible economic and social profits and losses for all its participants.
The article describes various case studies on the development of mutually beneficial relations in the production of pork and fruit and berries, which testify that the establishment of ties between small commodity producers and the enterprises of the agro-food industry based on common agro-food chains guarantees for the latter a sustainable development of their business, and for the rural households – technological modernization and access to profitable markets. Among the small commodity producers, the first to integrate in the chains of value added are those commercial farms, which are innovatively oriented and capable of overcoming mistrust and risks.
Keywords:corporate sector, agro-food chains, small commodity producers, rural households, agro-food corporations
JEL: О13; Q01; Q18
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 73 - 84) | Download | Downloads :758 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Astaxova, A. Po materialam doklada Pitera Drajpera "The shifting geography of global value chains: implication for trade policy" na vstreche e'kspertov mirovix issledovatel'skix centrov "Think 20" 11 dekabrya 2012 ,
ecpol.ru, za 18 sіchnya 2013 g.
2. Gereffi, G. (1994). The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks, Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. L., Praeger.
3. Gunasekaran, A. (2004). Supply chain management: Theory and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 265–268,
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.015
4. Humphrey, J. (2004). Upgrading in global value chains. Policy Integration Department World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization International Labour Office Working Paper, 28.
5. Plamen D. Mishev, Zornitsa D. Stoyanova (2009). Supply Chain of Organic Products in Bulgaria. Paper prepared for presentation at the 113th EAAE Seminar "A resilient European food industry and food chain in a challenging world", Chania, Crete, Greece, 2009, September 3–6.
6. Trienekens, J.H. and Hvolby, H.H. (2001). Models supply chain reengineering. Production Planning and Control, 12 (3), 254–264.
7. Porter, M. Konkurentnoe preimushhestvo: kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespechit' ego ustojchivost' (2006). Mjscow, Al'pina Biznes Buks.
8. Kaplinsky, R.,Morris, M. Handbook for Value Chain Research (2003). IDS.
9. Kaplinski, R. (2002). Rasprostranenie polozhitel'nogo vliyaniyaglobalizacii. Kakie vyvody mozhno sdelat' na osnovanii analiza cepochki nakopleniya stoimosti? Moscow, GU VShE'. Preprint GU VShE' , WP5/2002,03.
10. Borodina, O.M., Heyets, V.M., Gutorov, A.O. ta in. (2012). Ukrai'ns'ka model' agrarnogo rozvytku ta i'i' socioekonomichna pereorijentacija. NAS of Ukraine, In-t ekon. ta prognozuv. Kiev.
11. Farming and rural development in Ukraine: making dualisation work, Joint Research Centre, December 2012,
agrilife.jrc.ec.europa.eu/docu-ments/UkraineTechnicalReport.pdf
12. Dejneko, L.V., Shelud'ko, E.I. (2013). Harchova promyslovist' Ukrai'ny: efektyvnist' vykorystannja vyrobnychyh resursiv ta kadrovogo potencialu , NAS of Ukraine, In-t ekon. ta prognozuv. Kiev, 74–75.
13. Mychko, S. (2013). Kooperacija u prostracii': chomu v Ukrai'ni ne dijut' mehanizmy agrobiznesu, uspishno realizovani v us'omu sviti. Ukrai'na Moloda, 22 serpnja, 120.
14. Kooperatyvy – majbutnje sil's'kogo gospodarstva, Agrarnyj tyzhden',
a7d.com.ua/novini/8598-kooperativi-maybutnye-slskogo-gospodarstva.html