HOME PAGE Welcome to the site of Economy and Forecasting journal

№ 2014/1

Forecasting methods and models


CHEPELIEV M. 1

1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine

Simulation and evaluation of the economic impact of the change of the tariff policy on Ukrainian electricity market

Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2014; 1:121-138


ABSTRACT ▼


JEL: D58, Q43, Q48

Article in English (pp. 121 - 138) DownloadDownloads :544
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 121 - 138) DownloadDownloads :585

REFERENCES ▼

1. De Moor A. & Calamai, P. (1997). Subsidizing Unstable Development: Undermining the Earth with Public Funds, Earth Council. Retrieved from www.cbd.int/doc/case-studies/inc/cs-inc-earthcouncil-unsustainable-en.pdf [in English].
2. World Energy Outlook Insights, Looking at Energy Subsidies: Getting the Prices Right (1999). International Energy Agency. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.168.1604&rep=rep1& type=pdf [in English].
3. Protesting about power prices. n. d. The Economist. Retrieved from www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2013/02/bulgarias-electricity-prices [in English].
4. The Bulgarian prime minister unexpectedly resigns. n. d. The Economist. Retrieved from www.economist.com/news/europe/21572252-bulga¬rian-prime-minister-unexpectedly-resigns-power-protests [in English].
5. Brazil Protest Persist After Cities Revoke Fare Increase. n. d. Bloomberg. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-18/rousseff-vows-to-listen-to-message-of-brazilian-protests.html [in English].
6. Ogarenko, I. (2013). Eliminating Indirect Energy Subsidies in Ukraine: Estimation of Environmental and Socioeconomic Effects Using Input–Output Modeling. Kyiv: Hubacek. Retrieved from www.journalofeconomicstructures.com/content/pdf/2193-2409-2-7.pdf [in English].
7. Cross-subsidizing consumers in power (29.10.2010). The national electricity regulatory Commission of Ukraine. Retrieved from www2.nerc.gov.ua/control/uk/archive/ docview?typeId=81191 [in English].
8. Consumer price indices for 2012. (2013). The state statistics service of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Ukraine 2000. (2001). The state statistics service of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ukrstat. gov.ua/druk/buklet/2000/buklet1.doc.[in Ukrainian].
10. Average monthly wages by economic activity since the beginning of the year in 2012. The state statistics service of Ukraine. Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua/[in Ukrainian].
11. Consumer price indices in 1993-2012 (The corresponding period of the previous year). The state statistics service of Ukraine. Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
12. Dynamics and structure of electricity in January-February 2011. (2011). Jenergosberezhenie. Jenergetika. Jenergoaudit. – Power. Energetika. Power audit, 4, 3 [in Ukrainian].
13. Resolution of the National Electricity Regulatory Commission of Ukraine On the change in tariff for electricity sold to the population and settlements, and approve changes to the order of application of tariffs for electricity sold to the population and settlements of 13.01.2011 number 8. Retrieved from zakon.nau.ua/doc/?code=z0062-11 [in Ukrainian].
14. Tochickaja, I. & Shimanovich, G. (2007). The economic effect of increasing gas prices: a quantitative assessment. JeKOVEST. – ECOWEST, 124-137. Retrieved from www.research.by/webroot/delivery/files/ecowest/ 2007n1r04.pdf [in Russian].
15. Rutherford, T. & Paltsev, S. (1999). From an Input-Output Table to a General Equilibrium Model: Assessing the Excess Burden of Indirect Taxes in Russia. Retrieved from web.mit.edu/paltsev/www/ docs/exburden.pdf [in English].
16. Taylor, L. (2006). Computable General Equilibrium Models of Trade Liberalization: The Doha Debate. New School for Social Research. New York. Retrieved from 62.58.77.233/sn2/training% 20docs/Lecture%20Missaglia/Lecture%20Missaglia_Taylor%20CGE%20Models%20of%20Tarde%20Liberalization%20Doha%20Debate.pdf [in English].
17. Koesler, S.& Schymura, M. (2012). Substitution Elasticities in a CES Production Framework. An Empirical Analysis on the Basis of Non-Linear Least Squares Estimations. ZEW. Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 12. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2014655 [in English].
18. Okagawa A., Ban, K. (2008). Estimation of substitution elasticities for CGE models. Discussion Paper, 08-16. Retrieved from www2.econ.osaka-u.ac.jp/library/global/dp/0816.pdf [in English].
19. Bohringer, C. ,Rutherford, W., Wiegard, F. Omputable General Equilibrium Analysis: Opening a Black Box. Center for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 03-56. Retrieved from ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0356.pdf [ in English].
20. Hermeling, C. Mennel, T. (2008). Sensitivity analysis in economic simulation – a systematic approach. Center for European Economic Research. Retrieved from ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp08068.pdf [in English].
21. Jensen, J. (2012). Deep Trade Policy Options for Armenia: The Importance of Services, Trade Facilitation and Standards Liberalization ,Economics. Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6. Retrieved from www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2012-1/version_1/at_download/file [in English].