HOME PAGE | |
№ 4/2016
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Neo-industrialization in Ukraine: are there macroeconomic background and investment potential?
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2016; 4:48-69 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.04.048 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article estimates the level of investment readiness of Ukraine's economy for the new industrialization. Macroeconomic analysis has shown that the lack of investments is caused by significant decapitalization of the economy as a whole and in particular the non-financial corporations. The dominating trends towards reduction of the rate of net savings and the losses of capital reflect the sorry state of the real sector. The instability of financial conditions of the companies causes lack of equity and debt bondage, and prevents them from maintaining a proper level of gross savings, and hence that of gross fixed capital formation.
The high rate of debt bondage of the companies combined with ultra-high lending rates lead to increased costs of servicing and repayment of the debts, payment of property incomes, rise in production costs and consequently reduction of financial results. Such as financial results are the source of savings and the tax base their decrease causes the further reduction of investment resources in the economy and budget revenues.
Due to the long-term shortfall of gross disposable income in the real sector, which was caused by disruption of the economically grounded distribution of income among the institutional sectors and withdrawal of capital from economic turnover owing to shadowing and growing share of the offshore economy, the narrowing of the main sources of the fixed capital formation and shortage of investment resources in the economy happens. As a result, instead of investment progress, which is necessary for the neo-industrialization, there is an investments decline.
The author proposes various conceptual approaches to reviving investments for the transition to the model of economic development based on new industrialization.
Keywords: neo-industrialization of the economy, investment resources, gross fixed capital formation, net savings, gross savings, institutional sectors, net borrowing, capital investment
JEL: Е200, Е210, Е220, Е270, О140
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 48 - 69) | Download | Downloads :985 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Liashenko, V.I., Kotov, Ye.V. (2015). Ukraine XXI: neoindustrial state or "crash project"? National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for economy of industry, Poltava University of Economics and trade. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2016). The plan of priority actions of the Government in 2016. Approved by the decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of May 27, 2016 No. 418-r. Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/document/249113344/R0418-00.doc [in Ukrainian].
4. Krugman, Paul R. (1988). Deindustrialization, Reindustrialization, and the Real Exchange Rate. NBER Working Paper, May, 2586. doi: doi.org/10.3386/w2586
5. Peres, Carlota. (2011). Technological revolution and financial capital. The dynamics of bubbles and periods of prosperity. Moscow: Izd-vo "Delo" ANH [in Russian].
6. Ventura, Jaume, Voth, Hans-Joachim. (2015). Debt into growth: how sovereign debt accelerated the first industrial revolution. NBER Working Paper, June, 21280. doi: doi.org/10.3386/w21280
7. Aizenman, Joshua, Sushko, Vladyslav. (2011). Capital flow types, external financing needs, and industrial growth: 99 countries, 1991–2007. NBER Working Paper, July, 17228. doi: doi.org/10.3386/w17228
8. Jaremski, Matthew S. (2013). National banking's role in U.S. industrialization, 1850-1900. NBER Working Paper, February, 18789. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w18789
9. Holand, Yu. M. (2013). The experience of industrialization under NEP and its application in modern conditions Voprosy jekonomiki – Economic issues, 10, 109-135 [in Russian].
10. Kriuchkova, I.V. (2016). Macro-structural factors of investment crisis in the economy of Ukraine for the period 1991-2015. Ekonomìka ì prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 23–38. doi: doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.01.023 [in Ukrainian].
11. Skrypnychenko, M.I. (Ed.). (2015). Model identify macroeconomic imbalances in Ukraine. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
12. Zymovets', V.V. (2010). State financial policy of economic development. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
13. Zymovets', V.V. (2013). The accumulation of capital in the real sector and economic policy of the state. Visnyk Instytutu ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia – Bulletin of the Institute for Economics and Forecasting, 39–46 [in Ukrainian].
14. Bohdan, T., Bohdan, I. (2013). Modeling of the influence of debt policy on the economic development of Ukraine. Visnyk Natsional'noho banku Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine, 10, 20–27 [in Ukrainian].
15. Danylenko, A.I., Zymovets', V.V., Shelud'ko, N.M. (2015). The de-capitalization of the financial sector of Ukrainian economy: reasons and consequences. Ekonomìka ì prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 7-28 [in Ukrainian].
16. Danylenko, A.I. (Ed.). (2014). The impact of the crisis on the finances of the real sector of economy of Ukraine and ways of their improvement. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
17. Salikhova, O.B., Bak, H.O. (2015). Foreign technology as a determinant of investment and innovation processes in Ukraine. Stratehichni priorytety – Strategic priorities, 2(35), 93-105 [in Ukrainian].
18. Heyets, V.M. (2016). Economy of Ukraine: key problems and prospects. Ekonomìka ì prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 7-22. doi: doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.01.007 [in Ukrainian].
19. World Bank (2016). Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.GDI.FTOT.ZS
20. UNCTAD (2015). The least developed countries report 2015. doi: doi.org/10.18356/8b32c89b-en
21. Casini, Paolo, Kay, Neil, Pantea, Smaranda, Pashev, Konstantin (ed). EU Structural Change 2015. European Commission
22. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (2016). The Budget Of Ukraine 2015. Statistical Yearbook. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
23. World Bank (2016). Gross savings (% of GDP). Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNS.ICTR.ZS?view=chart
24. UNIDO (2013). Competitive Industrial Performance Report 2012/2013. Retrieved from www.unido.org
25. UNIDO (2016). Industrial Development Report 2016. Retrieved from www.unido.org
26. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Socio-economic development of Ukraine for January-August 2016. The state statistics service of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2016/so_ek_r_u/soekru_u/arh_soekru_16.htm [in Ukrainian].
27. Cheren'ko, L.M. (2015). New forms of poverty in Ukraine: the main manifestations and assessment. Demohrafiia ta sotsial'na ekonomika – Demography and social economy, 1, 11–21 [in Ukrainian].
28. "The money should be kept in banks": Holodnitsky showed how odious judge Chaus kept the original "income" (2016). Ukrainian National News Agency, August 10. Retrieved from www.unian.net/society/ [in Russian].
29. How many in Ukraine $. (2016). Financial portal "MinFin", October 21. Retrieved from minfin.com.ua [in Russian].
30. The legend of income declarations. Who has shocked Ukraine there wealth? (2016). Ekonomichna pravda – Economic truth, October 31. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2016/10/31/609596/ [in Ukrainian].
31. The people's deputies about 9.2 billion, of which 6.7 billion – in cash, – Gerus. (2016). Censor.net, October 31. Retrieved from censor.net.ua/news/412887/u_narodnyh_deputatov_okolo_92_mlrd_grn_iz_kotoryh_67_mlrd_nalichnye_gerus [in Russian].
32. National Bank of Ukraine (2016). Government bonds in circulation, by principal debt. Retrieved from bank.gov.ua/files/T-bills_debt.xls [in Ukrainian].
33. Shums'ka, S.S. (2015). Monetary policy and economic recovery in Ukraine. Ekonomìka ì prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 3, 21-41 [in Ukrainian].
34. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). The profitability of operating activity of enterprises by types of economic activity. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
35. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Net profit (loss) of enterprises by kinds of economic activities. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
36. The Ministry of economic development and trade of Ukraine (2016). Trends of the shadow economy in Ukraine And quarter of 2016. Retrieved from www.me.gov.ua/Documents/List?lang=uk-UA&tag=RozvitokRealnogoSektoraEkonomiki [in Ukrainian].
37. Korablin, S. (2016). Offshore depletion. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, May 13. Retrieved from gazeta.dt.ua/macrolevel/ofshorne-visnazhennya-_.html [in Ukrainian].
38. Mykola Jankowski is becoming in the West the symbol of Ukrainian corruption. (2016). Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, July, 16. Retrieved from gazeta.dt.ua/LAW/ [in Ukrainian].
39. National Bank of Ukraine (2016). Interest rates on new loans to non-financial corporations over the proper direction in terms of currencies. Retrieved from bank.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
40. OECD (2016). Long-term interest rates. doi: doi.org/10.1787/factbook-2015-36-en
41. OECD (2016). Short-term interest rates. Retrieved from data.oecd.org/interest/short-term-interest-rates.htm#indicator-chart
42. Lytvyn, V.V. (2014). Evaluation of the components of national savings in Ukraine: the formalization of approaches and identification of trends. Ekonomichnyj chasopys XXI – Economic journal XXI, 5-6, 52-55 [in Ukrainian].
43. Mylashko, O.H., Piskun, A.V. (2015). A comprehensive statistical analysis of national saving of Ukraine. Naukovyj visnyk Khersons'koho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson state University, 15, part 4, 161-164 [in Ukrainian].
№ 2/2017
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Localization of production – a world practice and conclusions for Ukraine
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2017; 2:31-56 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.031 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Despite the prevalence of localization measures in the practice of countries with different levels of development, localization requirements in Ukraine are still rare. Meanwhile, the dependence of Ukrainian economy on imports increases and acquires threatening dimensions. The expansion of imports begets weakening of country's economic stability, nourishes the structural crisis, impedes the development of industry, and causes a situation where imports suppress production instead of complementing it.
These problems represent the focus of the present study, which deals with theoretical and practical aspects of production localization. The study aims at determining the essence and forms of the requirements for localization, generalizing the world experience in applying such requirements with identifying their effectiveness, analyzing the specificity of such requirements in individual sectors of economy, and substantiating the economic necessity of their use in Ukraine.
The estimation of the import dependence of Ukrainian economy and, in particular, its industrial sector, based on data of the input-output tables allows detecting an excessive level of import dependence of Ukrainian economy and industry. It is proved that the proportions in which imports are involved in the economic processes are extraordinary, and hence a corresponding regulation with the application of systemic measures for production localization is required. The author identifies the areas of desirable application of the localization requirements for those industries that are critically dependent on imports by intermediate consumption, final consumption and gross capital formation, as well as various promising types of production with a solid scientific and innovation base.
Keywords: localization of production, foreign direct investments, import dependence of economy, value chain, WTO rules, industrial policy
JEL: D 570, Е 220, E 230, F 210, L 500, O 140, O
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 31 - 56) | Download | Downloads :787 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Investor nationality: Policy challenges. World investment report 2016 (2016). Geneva: UNCTAD - United Nations. Retrieved from worldinvestmentreport.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
3. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J., Cimino-Isaacs, Cathleen, Vieiro, Martin, and Wa-da, Erika. (2013). Local Content Requirements: A Global Problem. Washington: Peterson Insti-tute for International Economics. Retrieved from piie.com (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
4. Stephenson, Sherry M. (2013). Addressing local content requirements: Current challenges and future opportunities. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
5. Lin, Justin Yifu. (2015). China's G-20 agenda: Call for a multilateral investment framework for development. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
6. Ramdoo, Isabelle. (2015). Unpacking Local Content Requirements in the Extractive Sector: What Implications for the Global Trade and Investment Frameworks? Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
7. Bellmann, Christophe. (2016). Trade and Investment Frameworks in Extractive Industries: Challenges and Options. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF, 2016. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
8. Hoekman, Bernard. (2015). Subsidies and Spillovers in a Value Chain World: New Rules Required? Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
9. Molinari, Alvaro Cedeño. (2016). Investment and trade policy as drivers of sustainable development. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
10. Shinkaruk, L.V. (Ed.). (2012). World Economic Disproportionality: Peculiarities, Trends, Influence on the Economy of Ukraine. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for economics and forecasting. NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Ilyushha, S.N., Gerasimova, O.A. (2012). Estimation of import dynamics under long-term forecasting of macroindicators. Ekon. prognozuvannâ –Economics and Forecasting, 1, 65-74 [in Ukrainian].
12. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. (2016). Table "input-output" (in consumer prices). Kyiv. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Ukrainian].
13. Korablin, S. (April 8, 2017). Currency liberalization in Ukrainian: escape from reforms. Zerkalo nedely.Ukrayna – Mirror of the week, 13. Retrieved from URL: gazeta.dt.ua (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Ukrainian].
14. Olefir, V.K. (2016). Assessment of import dependence of the Ukrainian food market. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economics and Forecasting, 4, 91-105 [in Ukrainian].
15. Mel'nik, T.M., Pugachevskaya, K.S. (2016). Import dependence of Ukraine's economy and priorities of selective import substitution. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 4, 29-44 [in Ukrainian].
16. Shinkaruk, L.V. (Ed.). (2015). Structural Transformations in the Ukrainian Economy: Dynamics, Contradictions and Influence on Economic Development. NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Economics. and Forecasting NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
17. Weiss, Miriam. (2016). The role of local content policies in manufacturing and mining in low- and middle-income countries. UNIDO: Department of Policy, Research and Statistics Working Paper, 19. Retrieved from www.unido.org (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
18. Ramdoo, Isabelle. (May 2016). Local content policies in mineral-rich countries. An overview. Discussion Paper, 193. Retrieved from www.ecdpm.org/dp193 (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
19. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. (2009). U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved from www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr1enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr1enr.pdf (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
20. The Ministry of Economy of Uzbekistan presented the results and prospects for localization of production. (30 September, 2015). Review.uz. Retrieved from www.review.uz (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
21. How to get into the localization program. (15 March, 2017). Review.uz. Retrieved from www.review.uz (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
22. The Government of Uzbekistan increases the requirements for the obligations of foreign investors. (10 October, 2016). Review.uz. Retrieved from www.review.uz (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
23. The Ministry of Economy and the Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations of Uzbekistan have formed a list of new types of localized products. (17 June, 2016). Review.uz. Retrieved from www.review.uz (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
24. Ministry of Economy: in 2015, for 696 projects, the volume of production of localized products amounted to 4 trillion Sum. (25 February, 2016). Review.uz. Retrieved from www.review.uz (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
25. Import - for replacement. (2017). Information digest, 202. Retrieved from www.uzbekistan.de (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
26. Uzbekistan's industrial products are import substituting over 20%. (10 June, 2016). Econo-my. Retrieved from en.sputniknews-uz.com (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
27. Uzbekistan will bring home appliances to 55% by 2019. (22 June, 2016). Economy. Re-trieved from en.sputniknews-uz.com (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
28. Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2016). Regulatory and legal frame-work. Retrieved from mineconomy.uz/en/local 05/31/2017 (Last accessed: 25.05.2017) [in Russian].
29. Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2017). Localization programs. Re-trieved from mineconomy.uz/en/local 05/31/2017 (Last accessed: 25.05.2017) [in Rus-sian].
30. WTO (2016). Uzbekistan. Retrieved from www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/a1_ouzbekistan_e.htm (Last accessed: 25.05.2017).
31. Industry, value added (current US$). (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
32. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$). (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
33. GDP per capita (current US$). (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
34. Kuntze, Jan-Christoph, Moerenhout, Tom (May, 2013). Local Content Requirements and the Renewable Energy Industry - A Good Match? ICTSD. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 25.05.2017).
35. Years of Policies for Wind Energy: Lessons from China. (2016). International Renewable Energy Agency. Retrieved from www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/GWEC_China.pdf (Last accessed: 31.05.2017).
36. CISOLAR-2016. (27 April, 2016). EcoTecnik. Retrieved from ecotechnica.com.ua (Last accessed: 25.05.2017) [in Russian].
37. Ukrainian Wind Energy Association. (23 February, 2017). Technical and legal aspects of the implementation of wind energy projects in Ukraine. Retrieved from uwea.com.ua/en/news/entry/ (Last accessed: 25/05/2017) [in Ukrainian].
38. BRAZIL - Overview of medical device industry and healthcare statistics. (2017). EMERGO. Retrieved from www.emergogroup.com/resources/market-brazil (Last accessed: 25.05.2017).
39. Hummel, Guilherme S. (November, 2016). Brazil eHealth - Overview, Trends & Opportunities. Summary-report. EMI – eHealth Mentor Institut.
40. Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Act, 2010. (2010). Tax, regulatory & people services. Retrieved from www.ng.kpmg.com (Last accessed: 25.05.2017).
41. Atsegbua Lawrence Asekome. (December, 2012). The Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Con-tent Development Act 2010: an examination of its regulatory framework OPEC Energy Review, 36:4, 479-494. Retrieved from onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1753-0237.2012.00225.x/full (Last accessed: 25.05.2017).
42. GDP (current US$). (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
43. Merchandise exports (current US$). (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/ (Last accessed: 01.06.2017).
44. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. WTO Analytical Index: GATT 1994. Re-trieved from www.wto.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
45. WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs). WTO Analytical Index: Investment. Retrieved from search.wto.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
46. Trade And Investment. WTO: 2011 News Items. Retrieved from search.wto.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
47. Decree on the Cancellation of Local Content Requirements set out in Previous Legislations. No. 154/PM, date: 05/03/2012. WTO Documents Online - World Trade Organization. Retrieved from docs.wto.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
48. Alfaro, Laura, Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem, Volosovych, Vadym. (December, 2005). Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? An Empirical Investigation. NBER Working Pape, 11901. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w11901 (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
49. Oberhänsli, Herbert. (2015). Regulatory Competition in Globalising Markets for Improved Conditions for Private Investment. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
50. Joubin-Bret, Anna, Chiffelle Cristian Rodriguez (2017). G20 Guiding Principles for Global Investment Policymaking: A Stepping Stone for Multilateral Rules on Investment. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
51. Maskus, Keith E. (2015). Research and Development Subsidies: A Need for WTO Disci-plines? Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
52. Singh, Harsha V. (2016). New Industrial Policy and Manufacturing: Options for Internation-al Trade Policy. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
53. Lee, Keun. (2015). Industrial Policies for the Upper-Middle-Income Countries. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
54. Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo. (2016). Enabling the Energy Transition and Scale-up of Clean Energy Technologies: Options for the Global Trade System. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
55. Viñuales, Jorge E. (2015). International Investment Law and Natural Resource Governance. Geneva: ICTSD & WEF. Retrieved from www.ictsd.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017).
56. Deineko, L.V., Shovkun, I.A., Sheludko, E.I. etc. (2016). Neoindustrial transformation of industrial potential of Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/277.pdf (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Ukrainian].
57. Shovkun, Inna (1 April, 2017). Industrial revival of Ukraine: the price of the issue. Zerkalo nedely.Ukrayna – Mirror of the week. Retrieved from dt.ua/promyshliennost/promislove-vidrodzhennya-ukrayini-cina-pitannya-_.html (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Ukrainian].
58. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. (2016). Table " input-output" of Ukraine in 2014 at basic prices. Kyiv. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Ukrainian].
59. The question of import substitution in the Russian economy. (2016). Moscow: Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from inecon.org (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
60. Berezinskaya, O., Vedev, A. (2015). Production dependence of the Russian industry on imports and the mechanism of strategic import substitution. Questions of Economics, 1, 103-115 [in Russian].
61. Blockade of the SRDLR: Myths and Means. (02 September, 2017). Liga.Net. Retrieved from www.liga.net (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Russian].
62. Skrypnychenko M.I. (Ed.). (2015). Models of Identification of Macroeconomic Imbalances in Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
63. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Resolution No. 130 of March 1, 2017 Approval of the Procedure for Using the Funds Envisaged in the State Budget for Partial Compensation for the Cost of Agricultural Domestic Production. Retrieved from zakon3.rada.gov.ua (Last accessed: 21.04.2017) [in Ukrainian].
№ 4/2018
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Industrial development in decentralized conditions: experience of leading industrial countries and conclusions for Ukraine
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2018; 4:38-64 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.04.038 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with the issues of industrial development in the conditions of decentralization of power and economic authorities of the state, which has been launched in Ukraine. Since the problem of the deindustrialization of the national economy remains very acute, this study presents the tools and instruments to address it, which has a policy of decentralization in its arsenal. The purpose of this work is to reveal the content of decentralization, generalize the ap-proaches to ensuring economic growth and increasing public welfare on the basis of regional industrial development, as well as on the substantiation of the feasibility of their use in Ukraine.
The author highlights various essential aspects of decentralization and reveals the nature of its influence on the investment climate. Generalized the approaches to decentralization of state powers and finding effective forms of regional socio-economic development on an industrial basis, on the examples of countries-leaders in the world industrial-technological sphere. Justified the expediency of deepening decentralization and industrial development in order to strengthen the economic capacity of Ukrainian regions. The author constructs various econometric models to show the presence of a long-term statistically significant influence of industrial business and budget decentralization on the welfare of national population (2001-2016).
A cluster analysis was carried out that confirmed the existence of the impact of fiscal decentralization and the development of production business (including industrial and agricultural) on the welfare in the country's aggregate regions. Also, it allowed to determine the priority of the processing industry in comparison with other types of production in ensuring the prosperity of the regional population. It is shown that the key to improving the condition of regional economy should be the development of a new industrial sector based on the technologies of the Industry 4.0 in line with the strategy of development of the country's industrial complex.
Keywords: decentralization of power and economic authorities of the state, industrial development, regional development, investment climate, production localization, industry targeting, innovative clusters, public welfare, community capacity
JEL: С22, D69, H72, L50, O14, O018, O57, R12
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 38 - 64) | Download | Downloads :688 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Zhalilo,Yaroslav (2018, May 18). Economic growth: why are we losing it? Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from dt.ua/macrolevel/ekonomichne-zrostannya-chomu-mi-yogo-vtrachayemo-278200_.html [in Ukrainian].
3. Sas, Olena (2016, April 12). Decentralization under the microscope: analysis of the pros and cons for the united communities. Retrieved from decentralization.gov.ua/news/2101 [in Ukrainian].
4. Zhalilo, Yaroslav (2018, November 4). Will the spart give a flame or challenges for the new phase of decentralization. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from dt.ua/internal/chi-z-iskri-polum-ya-zaymetsya-abo-sim-viklikiv-dlya-novogo-etapu-decentralizaciyi-292921_.html [in Ukrainian].
5. Snihova, Olena (2018, April 29). Smart specialization and stupid realization. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from zn.ua/economics_of_regions/smart-specializaciya-i-stupid-realizaciya-282534_.html [in Ukrainian].
6. MERT presentation (2018, March 21). Development strategy of Ukraine's industrial complex (project). Retrieved from issuu.com/mineconomdev/docs/___________ip_strategy_________1_ [in Ukrainian].
7. Industrialization and collectivization in Ukraine: the course and consequences. History of Ukraine: course of lectures. Ukraine in the 20-30's of the XXth century. Retrieved from history.vn.ua/book/lection/39.html [in Ukrainian].
8. Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. The World Bank. doi: doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4470-6
9. Rosenbaum, Allan (2013). Decentralization and Local Governance: Comparing US and Global Perspectives. Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, 14(1), 11-17.
10. Litvack, Jennie, Ahmad, Junaid, Bird, Richard (1998). Rethinking Decentralizationin Developing Countries. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank. doi: doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4350-5
11. Decentralization: a sampling of definitions (1999, October). Joint UNDP-Government of Germany Evaluation of the UNDP Rolein Decentralization and Local Governance Working Paper. Retrieved from web.undp.org/evaluation/documents/decentralization_working_report.PDF
12. Bojanic, A.N. (2018). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Accountability, Economic Freedom, and Political and Civil Liberties in the Americas. Economies, 6(1), 8. doi: doi.org/10.3390/economies6010008
13. Iqbal, Nasir, Ud Din, Musleh, Ghani, Ejaz (2012, Autumn). Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Role of Democratic Institutions. The Pakistan Development Review, 173-195. doi: doi.org/10.30541/v51i3pp.173-195
14. Aslim, E.G., & Neyapti, B. (2017). Optimal fiscal decentralization: Redistribution and welfare implications. Economic Modelling, 6, 224-234. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.008
15. Baskaran, T., Feld, L.P., & Schnellenbach, J. (2016). Fiscal Federalism, Decentralization, and Economic Growth: A Meta‐Analysis. Economic Inquiry, 54(3), 1445-1463. doi: doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12331
16. Akai, Nobuo, and Masayo, Sakata (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. Journal of urban economics, 52(1), 93-108. doi: doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00018-9
17. Anping, Chen, Groenewold, Nicolaas (2013, December). The national and regional effects of fiscal decentralisation in China. The Annals of Regional Science, 51: 3, 731-760. doi: doi.org/10.1007/s00168-013-0554-4
18. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, Lago-Peñas, Santiago, Sacchi Agnese (2016, November). The impact of fiscal decentralization: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/278785364_The_impact_of_fiscal_decentralization_A_survey
19. Kim, Junghun, Sean, Dougherty (Eds). (2018). Fiscal Decentralisation and Inclusive Growth. OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/tax/federalism/fiscal-decentralisation-and-inclusive-growth.pdf
20. Boadway, R. and Dougherty, S. (2018). Decentralisation in a Globalised World: Consequences and Opportunities. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, 21. doi: doi.org/10.1787/ceaaa9b0-en
21. Chen, Zhi, and Nan, Zhao (2017). Research on the Effect of Fiscal Decentralization on Science and Technology Input in China. Agro food industry hi-tech, 28.3, 3014-3019.
22. Sobel, R. S., Dutta, N., & Roy, S. (2013). Does fiscal decentralization result in a better business climate? Applied Economics Letters, 20(1), 84-91. doi: doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.657344
23. Martínez-Vázquez, J., & McNab, R.M. (2006). Fiscal decentralization, macrostability, and growth. Hacienda Pública Española / Revista de Economía Pública, 179-(4/2006), 25-49.
24. Kindzerskyi, Y. (2017). Deindustrialization and its determinants in the world and in Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 11, 48-72 [in Ukrainian].
25. Shovkun, I. (2016). Neo-industrialization in Ukraine: are there macroeconomic preconditions and potential? Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 48-69. Retrieved from eip.org.ua/docs/EP_16_4_48_uk.pdf [in Ukrainian].
26. Pavlov, K. (2011). Regional factor in macroeconomic models. Obshhestvo i jekonomika – Society and economy, 6, 110-122 [in Russian].
27. Tsvetkova, A. (2010). The economic development policy in the USA: contemporary trends and causes of state-level variations. Voprosy ekonomiki – Economics,. 9, 133-143 [in Russian].
28. Rosenbaum, Allan (2013).Decentralization and Local Governance: Comparing US and Global Perspectives. Halduskultuur – AdministrativeCulture, 14 (1), 11-17.
29. Built in the USA. Being here makes us better. Retrieved from www.kia.com/us/en/content/why-kia/built-in-the-usa/overview
30. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_U.S._International
31. Mercedes-Benz Tuscaloosa Plant. Retrieved from www.daimler.com/dccom/0-5-1382119-1-1333338-1-0-0-0-0-0-9506-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0.html
32. Electrolux Group Expands Operations in South Carolina and Tennessee (2018, January 31). Area Development News Desk. Retrieved from www.areadevelopment.com/newsItems/1-31-2018/electrolux-group-anderson-south-carolina-springfield-tennessee.shtml
33. Porter, Eduardo (2018, May 2). Lessons From Rust-Belt Cities That Kept Their Sheen. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/05/01/business/economy/rust-belt-cities.html
34. Krugman, Paul R. (1983). Targeted industrial policies: theory and evidence. Proceedings – Economic Policy Symposium – Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Retrieved from www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/sympos/1983/S83KRUGM.pdf
35. Carlson, Virginia L. (1994, Jenuary). Rick Matto on Industry Targeting: A New Approach to Local Economic Development. Chicago Fed Letter, 77. Retrieved from www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/1994/january-77
36. Volkova, N.N., Sahno, T.V. (2007). US industrial clusters. SShA - Kanada. Jekonomika, politika, kul'tura – USA - Canada Economics, politics, culture, 1, 51-68 [in Russian].
37. Barton, Dominic, Katz, Bruce J. (2015, February 02). Priorities for Jump starting the U.S. Industrial Economy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from hbr.org/2015/02/priorities-for-jumpstarting-the-u-s-industrial-economy
38. Vey, Jennifer S., Austin, John C., and Bradley, Jennifer (2010). The Next Economy: Economic Recovery and Transformation in the Great Lakes Region. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0927_great_lakes.pdf
39. Ohio Department of Development,Office of Strategic Research (2010, August). Ohio's Logistics Cluster. Retrieved from development.ohio.gov/files/research/b800000000.pdf
40. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (2008). Changing Course Ohio Economic Analysis. Retrieved from ohiolmi.com/research/publications/2008OhioEconomicAnalysis.pdf
41. Gross Domestic Product of Ohio. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from www.odod.state.oh.us/research/files/E100.pdf.
42. Priority Investment Areas. Retrieved May 30, 2008. Retrieved from www.odod.state.oh.us/cms/uploadedfiles/Research/g200000000(3).pdf
43. Ohio Job Outlook to 2014. Retrieved June 3, 2008. Retrieved from lmi.state.oh.us/proj/Projections/Ohio/OhioJobOutlook.pdf
44. Temple James. California's plan to integrate the West Coast grid is a great idea–that could easily backfire (2018, July 11). MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com/s/611627/californias-plan-to-integrate-the-west-coast-grid-is-a-great-idea-that-could-easily/
45. Temple, James (2017, December 28). How to Get Wyoming Wind to California, and Cut 80% of U.S. Carbon Emissions. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com/s/609766/how-to-get-wyoming-wind-to-california-and-cut-80-of-us-carbon-emissions/
46. California Legislative Information. AB-813 Multistate regional transmission system organization: membership (2017-2018). Retrieved from leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB813
47. Cullenward, Danny, Welton, Shelley (2018). The Quiet Undoing: How Regional Electricity Market Reforms Threaten State Clean Energy Goals. Yale Journal on Regulation Bulletin (forthcoming). doi: doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3212687
48. Vey, Jennifer S., Austin, John C., and Bradley, Jennifer (2010). The Next Economy: Economic Recovery and Transformation in the Great Lakes Region. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0927_great_lakes.pdf
49. Acs, Gregory, Pendall, Rolf, Treskon, Mark, Khare, Amy (2017, March). The Cost of Segregation: National Trends and the Case of Chicago, 1990–2010. Research Report. Urban Institute. Retrieved from www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/89201/the_cost_of_segregation_final.pdf
50. Leland, John (2018, April 22). Touring the Rust Belt of New York City. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/04/22/nyregion/touring-the-rust-belt-of-new-york-city.html
51. Porter, Eduardo (2018, May 2). Lessons From Rust-Belt Cities That Kept Their Sheen. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/05/01/business/economy/rust-belt-cities.html
52. Rotman, David (2018, June 18). From rust belt to robot belt: Turning AI into jobs in the US heartland. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com/s/611412/ai-could-wreak-economic-havoc-we-need-more-of-it/
53. About Uber ATG (2018). Retrieved from www.uber.com/info/atg/
54. Argo AI LLC (2018). Technology that drives a new age of mobility. Retrieved from www.argo.ai/
55. Aurora Innovation, Inc. (2018). Aurora Wordmark. URL: aurora.tech/
56. Caterpillar – Cat (2015, November 4). Caterpillar Startup Challenge Allows 10 Companies to Pitch their Visions. Equipment Today. Retrieved from www.forconstructionpros.com/equipment/press-release/12134459/caterpillar-cat-caterpillar-startup-challenge-allows-10-companies-to-pitch-their-visions
57. Caterpillar (2015, November 4). Companies Participate in the Caterpillar Startup Challenge. Retrieved from www.caterpillar.com/en/news/caterpillarNews/innovation/10-companies-participate-in-the-caterpillar-startup-challenge.html
58. Treasury Releases Proposed Regulations on Opportunity Zones Designed to Incentivize Investment in American Communities (2018, October 19). U.S. Department of the Treasury. Retrieved from home.treasury.gov/index.php/news/featured-stories/treasury-releases-proposed-regulations-on-opportunity-zones-designed-to
59. Manufacturing, value added (current US$). World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.IND.MANF.CD
60. Research and Development: National Trends and International Comparisons. Science & Engineering Indicators 2016. National Science Board. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/uploads/1/7/chapter-4.pdf
61. Timothy, W. (2018, Oct. 30). Martin American Tech Firms Are Winning the R&D Spending Race With China. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/american-tech-firms-are-winning-the-r-d-spending-race-with-china-1540873318
62. The Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018. Insight Report. World Economic Forum 2018. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf
63. Shen, C., Jin, J., & Zou, H.F. (2012). Fiscal Decentralization in China: History, Impact, Challenges and Next Steps. Annals of Economics & Finance, 13(1), 1-51.
64. Huang, Yukon (2018, March 13). China's Economy Is Not Normal. It Doesn't Have to Be. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/opinion/china-economy-corruption.html
65. Li, Yuan (2018, Oct. 3). Private Businesses Built Modern China. Now the Government is Pushing Back. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/10/03/business/china-economy-private-enterprise.html?emc=edit_mbe_20181004&nl=morning-briefing-europe&nlid=8560471520181004&te=1
66. Xu, Chenggang (2011). The Fundamental Institutions of China's Reforms and Development. Journal of Economic Literature,. 49(4), 1076-1151. doi: doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.1076
67. OECD/UCLG (2016). Subnational Governments around the world: Structure and finance. Annexes. Profile-China. Retrieved from www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/global_observatory_on_local_finance_0.pdf
68. National Statistical Bureau (2016). China Statistical Yearbook. Divisions of Administrative Areas in China (End of 2015).
69. List of state-owned enterprises of China. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state-owned_enterprises_of_China#cite_ref-2
70. National Statistical Bureau (2016). China Statistical Yearbook. Number of Business Enteties by Region and Status of Registration (2015).
71. Qiao, Baoyun, Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, Xu, Yongsheng (2008). The trade off between growth and equity in decentralization policy: China's experience. Journal of Development Economics,. 86, 112-128. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.05.002
72. National Statistical Bureau (2016). China Statistical Yearbook. Public Budget Revenue and Expenditure and Their Increase Rates.
73. Zhou, F., Tan, M. (2017). Tax-Sharing System. In: Relationship between the Central Government and Local Governments of Contemporary China. Social Development Experiences in China. Springer, Singapore. doi: doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4388-8_3
74. Ma, Fengmei, et al. (2018). Material footprint of a fast-industrializing region in China, Part 1: Exploring the materialization process of Liaoning Province. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, 228-238. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.015
75. The decentralization of power in 2014 helped China withstand the pressure of the economic downturn - Li Keqiang (2015, March 15). Retrieved from russian.people.com.cn/n/2015/0315/c31521-8863311.html
76. World Economic Forum (2018). Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018. Retrieved from www.weforum.org
77. Trach, Natalya. Aslund, Anders (2018, February 2). Ukrainian authorities are concerned about their own enrichment, not about the welfare of the population. Economichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2018/02/2/633667/ [in Ukrainian].
78. Kabachinska, Svitlana (2018 , May 26). Hypermarket `Khmelnychchyna`. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from dt.ua/internal/gipermarket-hmelnichchina-278877_.html [in Ukrainian].
79. Dubrovik-Rokhova, Alla (2016, Oct. 12). Ukraine today is Peru in 1979. Den' – The Day. Retrieved from day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/ekonomika/ukrayina-sogodni-ce-peru-1979-go [in Ukrainian].
80. Tregub, Hanna (2015, November 5). Michel Tereshchenko: "I donot want Glukhov to be a buffer zone. Ukrains'kyj tyzhden' – Ukrainian week, 44 (416) [in Ukrainian].
81. Dubrovik-Rokhova, Alla (2018, April 11). Plan "A" did not work. Do you have a "B" plan? Den' – The Day. Retrieved from day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/podrobyci/plan-ne-spracyuvav-u-vas-ye-plan-b [in Ukrainian].
82. A plant for the production of mixed fertilizers opened in Ternopil region (2015, September 22). Retrieved from www.agroperspectiva.com/ru/news/151252 [in Russian].
83. Regional development agencies should be considered as promising startups... (2018, January 19). Decentralization provides opportunities. Retrieved from decentralization.gov.ua/news/8057 [in Ukrainian].
84. Unique investment opportunities of Zhytomyr region (2018). Agency for Regional Development of Zhytomyr Region.. Retrieved from otg.mrada-baranivka.gov.ua/images/documents/2018/2018-11-02PRESENTATION_1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
85. Report of the Agency "Regional Development Agency of Vinnytsia Region". Period: 2017. Retrieved from drive.google.com/file/d/1XKkV_aEiJfRf7XbAd5xS0wbOYIShC97P/view [in Ukrainian].
86. Soldak, M., Shamileva, L. (2018). Development factors of the industrial regions: innovation based modernization opportunities on an innovative basis. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Economy of the industry, 1 (81), 21-43 [in Ukrainian].
87. Kasich, A. (2017). Regional economic autonomy in the context of the modernization revival. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Economy of the industry, 3 (79), 96-113 [in Ukrainian].
88. Lunina, I. (Ed.). (2017). Consolidation of Public Finances in Ukraine. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/288.pdf [in Ukrainian].
89. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2018). Gross Regional Productin in 2016. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
90. Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (2017). Budget of Ukraine in 2016. Retrieved from www.minfin.gov.ua/news/view/statystychnyi-zbirnyk-ministerstva-finansiv--biudzhet-ukrainy--?category=bjudzhet [in Ukrainian].
91. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2018). Incomes and expenses of the population in 2016. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
92. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Employed population by economic activity in 2012-2016. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
93. Reinert, E.C. (2011). How wealthy countries become wealth, and why poor countries remain poor. Moscow: Publishing House of the State University - Higher School of Economics [in Russian].
94. Rating of agrarian regions in total production of agricultural products for 2016. Retrieved from media.uagroup.ua/top-5-naybilsh-agrarnih-oblastey-ukrayini [in Ukrainian].
95. Hirshfel'd, Anatolij, Salikhova, Olena (2017, Oct. 4). Will Ukraine move to the Club of the wealthy states. Uriadovyj kur'ier – Government Courier. Retrieved from ukurier.gov.ua/uk/articles/chi-vtoruye-ukrayina-shlyah-do-klubu-zamozhnih-der/ [in Ukrainian].
96. Lunina, I. (Ed.). (2016). Development of Budget Decentralization in Ukraine: Scientific Report. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
97. Kalachova, Galina, Denkov, Dmitry (2018, January 23). 150 kilometers from the Circular Road, or what decentralization did to small towns. Economichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2018/01/23/633277/ [in Ukrainian].
98. Companies opened in Ukraine since the beginning of 2015. Retrieved from www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1kI7M2ngkfqQ78HuA0sCKGEaENzg&ll=48.924196793362405%2C30.211749000000054&z=6 [in Ukrainian].
99. 10 Ukrainian plans younger than a year old (2016, May 25). BusinessViews. Retrieved from businessviews.com.ua/ru/business/id/10-ukrainskih-zavodov-kotorym-esche-ne-ispolnilsja-god-1134/ [in Russian].
№ 4/2019
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Investment climate as a factor of industrial development in Ukraine
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2019; 4:70-103 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2019.04.070 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with the provision of industrial development based the attraction of in-vestment depending on the changing characteristics of the investment climate. Since the problems of stagnation of the industrial production, its low productivity, excessive financial vulnerability (in view of high debt dependence and low solvency of the sector’s companies), capital losses, and the level of profitability, which is insufficient for reproduction, all remain relevant, the study offers those means of their solution that are related to attracting investments and improving the investment climate.
The author highlights essential aspects of the investment climate and its impact on attract-ing investment in the industrial development. Conducted a comparative analysis of the indicators of industrial activities depending on the characteristics of the investment climate on the example of reference groups of foreign countries and Ukraine, which revealed various problematic aspects of the conditions of investment in Ukrainian industry. A set of econometric models was developed with whose help the author substantiates the effect of the system of factors of the investment climate (namely: macroeconomic stability, development level of the goods, financial and labor markets, innovative activities and technological transfer) on the industrial development and assesses the changes caused by thelong term shifts in the parameters of the industrial system.
The author shows the feasibility of implementing a comprehensive approach to improving investment conditions with the use of various public policy instruments that determine the investment climate (including macroeconomic, monetary, and scientific and innovation policies as well as policies of the expansion of product inlets and regulation of the labor market) to ensure industrial development. In particular, in the context of the support of innovation, the article proposes the application of smart specialization strategies, which envisages modernization and diversification of regional industrial potential, and enhancing their entrepreneurial capabilities based on the introduction of technological innovations.
Keywords:investment climate, industrial development, attraction of investment, macroeconomic stability, financial market, credit resources, domestic market, exports, imports, innovation, technological transfer, labor market, wages
JEL: С 22, E 27, F 21, J 21, L 50, O 14, O 16, O
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 70 - 103) | Download | Downloads :593 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. World Economic Forum (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR20172018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf
3. Samayeva, Yu. (2019, July 13). What they earned - they ate everything. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 27. Retrieved from dt.ua/interview/scho-zarobili-vse-z-yili-317261_.html [in Ukrainian].
4. Bogdan, I. (2019, July 15). How much investment does Ukraine need? INVESTGAZETA. Retrieved from investgazeta.ua/blogs/skilki-investitsij-potribno-ukrajini?fbclid=IwAR1lAPMNHJdxKiXA9JZxoXq0nLHndfPaDIaU7mBq0jkrr4AUwfKO4dOKu5s [in Ukrainian].
5. Capital investment by assets for 2010-2018. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2013/ibd/ibd_rik/ibd_u/ki_rik_u_bez.htm
6. Ukraine. The Global Competitiveness Index 2017-2018 edition. Retrieved from reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-index-2017-2018/countryeconomy-profiles/#economy=UKR
7. UNCTAD (2019). World Investment Report 2019. Special Economic Zones. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2019_overview_en.pdf
8. UNCTAD (2018). World Investment Report 2018: Investment and New Industrial Policies. Retrieved from unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2018_en.pdf
9. Batra, G., Kaufmann, D., Stone, A.H.W. (2003). Investment Climate Around the World. Voices of the Firms from the World Business Environment Survey. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; The World Bank. doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5390-X
10. Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2017/2018 : Foreign Investor Perspectives and Policy Implications (2018). World Bank Group. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28493
11. OECD (2019). OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Croatia 2019, OECD Investment Policy Reviews. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-investment-policy-reviews-croatia-2019-2bf079ba-en.htm
12. Investment Climate Statements for 2018. Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs. Retrieved from www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/investmentclimatestatements/index.htm#wrapper
13. Echandi, R., Krajcovicova, J., Qiang, Ch. Z. (2015). The Impact of Investment Policy in a Changing Global Economy: A Review of the Literature. Policy Research Working Paper Trade and Competitiveness Global Practice Group, 7437. doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7437
14. Fajnzylber, P., Guasch, J.L., López, J.H. (2009). Does the Investment Climate Matter? Microeconomic Foundations of Growth in Latin America. Washington, DC : The World Bank; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7411-5
15. Bahy, El-hadj, Fangz, Lei (2011, August 1). Impact of the Business Environment on Output and Productivity in Africa. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
16. Eifert, B., Gelb, A., Ramachandran, V. (2006). Business Environment and Comparative Advantage in Africa: Evidence from the Investment Climate Data. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2006. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; The World Bank. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1112857
17. Kinda, T., Plane, P., Veganzones-Varoudakis, M.-A. (2011, December). Firm Productivity and Investment Climate Indeveloping Countries: How Does Middle East and North Africa Manufacturing Perform? The Developing Economies, l: 49, 429-462. doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2011.00146.x
18. Ajagbe, F.A., Ajetomobi, J.O. (2017, July). Impact of Investment Climate on Total Factor Productivity of Manufacturing Industries in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8: 4. doi.org/10.1515/mjss-2017-0015
19. Dollar, D., Hallward-Driemeier, M., Mengistae, T. (2005). Investment Climate and Firm Performance in Developing Economies. World Bank. doi.org/10.1086/431262
20. Trung, N. Ba, Kaizoji, T. (2017). Investment climate and firm productivity: an application to Vietnamese manufacturing firms. Applied Economics, 49: 44, 4394-4409. doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1282148
21. Hallward-Driemeier, M., Wallsten, S., Xu, L.C. (2006). Ownership, investment climate and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Economics of Transition, 14(4), 629-647. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00267.x
22. Woo, Jaejoon (2012, January). Technological upgrading in China and India: what do we know? OECD Development Centre Working Paper, 308.
23. Athukorala, Prema-chandra, Veeramani, C. (2017, Winter/Spring). Internationalization of Indian Enterprises: Patterns, Determinants, and Policy Issues. Asian Economic Papers, 16: 1, 142-166. doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00496
24. Ashok, L. (2019, October 02). This is how India can become the next Silicon Valley. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/10/india-technology-development-silicon-valley/?utm_source=sfmc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2703006_AgendaWeekly4October2019&utm_term=&emailType=Agenda%20Weekly%20Newsletter
25. India shows remarkable resilience amid global slowdown: World Economic Forum (2019, October 2). Financial express. Retrieved from www.financialexpress.com/economy/india-shows-remarkable-resilience-amid-global-slowdown-world-economic-forum/1724550/?utm_source=sfmc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2703006_AgendaWeekly4October2019&utm_term=&emailType=Agenda%20Weekly%20Newsletter
26. Shovkun, I. (2018). Industrial development in decentralized conditions: experience of leading industrial countries and conclusions for Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 40-66. doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.04.038 [in Ukrainian].
27. OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Ukraine 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/oecd-investment-policy-reviews-ukraine-2016_9789264257368-en
28. Timtchenko, I. (2019, July 2). Francis Fukuyama: ‘Ukraine should grow an economy outside of oligarchs’ purview’. KyivPost. Retrieved from www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/francis-fukuyama-ukraine-should-grow-an-economy-outside-of-oligarchs-purview.html
29. Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine; ’An action programme of the government of Ukraine'on October 4, 2019, No188-IX. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/188-ix [in Ukrainian].
30. International Finance Corporation (World Bank Group) (2016, July). The Investment Climate. Retrieved from www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/The-Investment-Climate_IFC-World-Bank-Group_IATF-Issue-Brief.pdf
31. World Bank. World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5987
32. Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2015). Retrieved from www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.227/L.1/
33. Beioley, K. (2019, February 4). UK’s finance chiefs say Brexit is biggest risk to business. Financial times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/dbbe0ad8-27a7-11e9-a5ab-ff8ef2b976c7
34. United Kingdom Manufacturing Production. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/manufacturing-production
35. Partington, R. (2019, September 2). UK factory output dives to seven-year low as Brexit fears rise. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/business/2019/sep/02/uk-factory-output-brexit-eu-manufacturers
36. United Kingdom CBI Industrial Trends Orders. Trading economics. Retrieved from tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/factory-orders
37. Beioley, Kate (2019, February 4). UK’s finance chiefs say Brexit is biggest risk to business. Financial times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/dbbe0ad8-27a7-11e9-a5ab-ff8ef2b976c7
38. Kirka, Danica (2019, March 2). Nissan's second thoughts on UK-made SUV add to Brexit worry. Daily Herald. Retrieved from www.dailyherald.com/article/20190203/news/302039960/
39. Jasper, Jolly (2019, February 19). Honda's Swindon factory closure threatens 7,000 jobs – business live. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/business/live/2019/feb/19/honda-expected-to-confirm-factory-closure-business-live
40. Investors fret about dual-listed shares under a hard Brexit (2019, Fabruary 5). Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/3c19e572-256f-11e9-b329-c7e6ceb5ffdf
41. Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index (GMCI) 2016 / Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (2017). Retrieved from www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Manufacturing/gx-global-mfg-competitiveness-index-2016.pdf
42. Kindzers'kyi, Yu.V. (2017). Deindustrialization and its determinants in the world and in Ukraine. Ekon. Ukr. – Economy of Ukraine, 11, 48-72 [in Ukrainian].
43. Sidenko, V.R. (2018). Global structural transformations and trends in ukrainian economy. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 37-57. doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.037 [in Ukrainian].
44. Buzgalin, A.V. (2018). The sunset of neoliberalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki – Economic issues, 2, 122-141. doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-2-122-141 [in Russian].
45. Ukraine needs US$10 bln in investment annually to accelerate economic growth – Finance Minister (2019, February 18). UNIAN. Retrieved from economics.unian.ua/finance/10450293-u-minfini-rozpovili-skilki-potribno-ukrajini-investiciy-dlya-priskorennya-ekonomichnogo-zrostannya.html [in Ukrainian].
46. Zimovets, V.V. (Ed.). (2019). Development of the enterprise’s finance of corporate sector in economy of Ukraine. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
47. Shelud`ko, N.M. (2016, June 22). Decapitalization of the financial sector and prospects for the corporate lending resuming. In Corporate Finance: problems and perspectives of the innovation development: Ukrainian Research and Practice Conf. (pp. 241-244). Kyiv: KNEU. Retrieved from ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/19421 [in Ukrainian].
48. Zimovets V.V., Sheludko, N.M. (2017). Debt burden and investment disfunction in the real sector of Ukraine. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Economy of Industry, 3 (79), 82-95. doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2017.03.082 [in Ukrainian].
49. Fal'ko, Ya. (2019, February 22). Chemical Industry of Ukraine: in the Turbulence Zone, or Who is "Responsibility" for Food Security of the State? Golos Ukrainy – Voice of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.golos.com.ua/article/314057 [in Ukrainian].
50. Groisman told: when could Ukraine refuse to import gas (2019, February 19). Ukrayins’ka pravda – Ukrainian truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/news/2019/02/19/645394 [in Ukrainian].
51. Zimovets, V.V. (2017, November 10). The impact of macro-financial imbalances on investment activity in Ukraine. In Financial and credit mechanism of activation of the investment process: Proceedings of the Third International Research and Practice Conf. (pp. 138-141). Kyiv: KNEU. Retrieved from ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/23192 [in Ukrainian].
52. Galasyuk ,V. (2016, March 15). Ukraine: from the eating up to the modernization. LB.UA. Retrieved from blogs.lb.ua/victor_galasuik/330287_ukraina_vid_proidannya.html [in Ukrainian].
53. Implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement: economic challenges and new opportunities (2016). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
54. Shumska, S.S. (2017). Money and economic dynamics in Ukraine: theory and empirical assessments of the relationship. Ekonomika i suspil'stvo – Economy and Society, 11, 603-611 [in Ukrainian].
55. Sharov, O. (2019, September 7). Buridan’s fly. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 33. Retrieved from dt.ua/finances/buridanova-muha-322825_.html [in Ukrainian].
56. Danylenko, A., Zymovets, V., Shelud'ko, N. (2015). Decapitalization of Ukraine's financial sector: causes and consequences. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 7-28. doi.org/10.15407/eip2015.04.007 [in Ukrainian].
57. Korablin, S. (2019, October 20). Credit Price. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 39. Retrieved from dt.ua/finances/cina-kreditu-326704_.html [in Ukrainian].
58. Reproductive Dynamics of the Economic Systems: Institutions and Activities (2018). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/297.pdf [in Ukrainian].
59. National Bank of Ukraine (2019). Financial Stability Report Des. 2018 . Retrieved from www.bank.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
60. Industrial Development Report 2018. Demand for Manufacturing: Driving Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Retrieved from www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2017-11/IDR2018_FULL%20REPORT.pdf
61. Zbarazs'ka, L.O. (2018, February 28). Features of development and protection of the competition in Ukraine in the neo-industrialization context. In Global dimensions of economic competition protection: Materials of II international scientific and practical conf. (pp. 44-48). Kyiv: LTD «Tenar» [in Ukrainian].
62. Factors and Trends in the Economic Growth of Ukraine (2018). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/302.pdf [in Ukrainian].
63. Shovkun, I. (2017). Localization of production – a world practice and conclusions for Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 2, 31-56. doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.02.031 [in Ukrainian].
64. Shinkorenko, T.P, Belotserkovets, O.G. Structural imbalances of the Ukrainians' export of goods to EU countries and directions of overcoming it. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/%D0%A8%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE_%D0%91%D1%96%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%8C-2015.doc.pdf [in Ukrainian].
65. Widmer, Adrian (2019, February 4). 4 myths about manufacturing in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/4-myths-about-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-and-how-they-are-holding-you-back/
66. Debby, W., Henry, H. and Hannah, D. (2019, June 20). Who's Winning the Tech Cold War? A China vs. U.S. Scoreboard. Bloomberg. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-us-china-who-is-winning-the-tech-war/
67. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2018). Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
68. Eurostat (2019, January 10). First estimates of Research & Development expenditure. Newsrelease. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/9483597/9-10012019-AP-EN.pdf/856ce1d3-b8a8-4fa6-bf00-a8ded6dd1cc1
69. Haustov, V. (2019? February 2). Ukrainian science: how get off a steep peak? Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 4. Retrieved from dt.ua/SCIENCE/ukrayinska-nauka-yak-viyti-z-krutogo-pike-301424_.html [in Ukrainian].
70. Ukrainians are looking for a work abroad because a low economic growth, – the IMF (2019, January 13). FINANCEUA. Retrieved from news.finance.ua/ua/news/-/441724/ukrayintsi-shukayut-robotu-za-kordonom-cherez-nyzke-ekonomichne-zrostannya-mvf [in Ukrainian].
71. Leadership in the loss of a labor was predicted to Ukraine (2019, January 11). FINANCEUA. Retrieved from news.finance.ua/ua/news/-/441861/ukrayini-naprorokuvaly-liderstvo-u-vtrati-robochoyi-syly [in Ukrainian].
72. The Czech Republic wants to double the quota for employment of Ukrainians (2018, January 28). Yevropejs'ka pravda – European truth. Retrieved from www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2019/01/28/7092131/?utm_source=traqli&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=331&tqid=gvDuMmsmHRIBvw81tUuCwX8yNsyRiPpjakuu6wlo [in Ukrainian].
73. Blyzniuk, V., Yuryk, Y. (2018). Asymmetricity in the development of the industrial segment of Ukrainian labor market. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 65-80. doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.04.065 [in Ukrainian].
№ 3/2021
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
STRUCTURAL SHIFTS: IMPACT ON PRODUCTIVITY AND GROWTH OF UKRAINE'S ECONOMY
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2021; 3:59-76 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2021.03.059 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The leading feature of the modern world has been the deep structural shifts caused by radical transformations of its industrial landscape. The corresponding transformations were caused by changes in the internal structure of national industrial sectors and were based on the technologies of the "fourth industrial revolution", whose emergence gave additional impetus to the structural transformation of the world economy, intensifying competition in global markets. The Covid crisis was a catalyst for accelerating changes in the intersectoral proportions of the world economy, complicating the existing structural problems.
The study shows that the key feature of the model of structural changes that occurred in Ukraine's economy after the global financial crisis was the accelerated reduction of the industrial sector, especially the loss of potential of the processing industry, its technological simplification and narrowing the variety of industries. This was accompanied by increased dominance of the tertiary sector and the growth of the primary sector. Excessive share in the structure of production is occupied by industries, whose mode of reproduction is able to generate only relatively low rates of economic growth (mining and related industries of primary processing in industry and agriculture). Such a trend of structural shifts is not able to generate the necessary boost of economic growth, and much less so as it is burdened by the risks of deepening structural inconsistency of Ukraine’s economy with the cardinal changes taking place in the world economy.
Comparison of parameters and trends of structural changes in Ukraine’s economy and in a comparable group of countries and the world as a whole shows that the changes in the structure of Ukraine’s economy were much higher, but did not create sufficient potential for sustainable economic growth. The author analyzes the gaps in labor productivity between economic activities and sectors of Ukraine’s economy, as well as changes in their dynamics, which leads to the conclusions about the relationship between the rates of technological development of different sectors of Ukraine’s economy and the gradual slowdown of the already imperfect technological development of this country’s industry with further loss of competitiveness. Estimated the degree of influence of such factors as investments and technological innovations, as well as shifts in the structure of employment on the increase of labor productivity in Ukraine’s economy. Using the apparatus of econometric modeling, the author evaluates the dependence of the dynamics of GDP growth on the change of the indices of the physical volume of GVA in the sectors of this country’s economy.
Keywords:structural changes, index of structural changes, labor productivity, economic growth, industrial sector, manufacturing, technological development
JEL: С2; C5; F6; J24; L5; L6; O2; O3; O4
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 59 - 76) | Download | Downloads :350 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. UNIDO 2020. Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP). Retrieved from stat.unido.org/database/MVA%202020,%20Manufacturing
3. Valli, V., Saccone, D. (2009). Structural Change and Economic Development in China and India. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 6 (1), 101-129. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1486093
4. Markus, E., Francis, T. (2013). Structural Change and Cross-Country Growth Empirics. Policy Research Working Paper; 6335. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org
5. UNIDO (2019). Industrial Development Report 2020. Industrializing in the digital age. Retrieved from www.unido.org/resources-publications-flagship-publications-industrial-development-report-series/idr2020
6. Shovkun, I.A. (2020). Geoeconomic preconditions for industrial development of Ukraine. In Serhiienko V.I. (Ed.). Legislative development of the real sector of the economy (p. 35-51). Is. 6. Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Liudmyla» [in Ukrainian].
7. McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., Sepulveda, C. (2017, May). Structural Change, Fundamentals and Growth: A Framework and Case Studies. NBER Working Paper. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8962-9214-7
8. Rodrik, D, Diao, X, McMillan, M. (2019). The Recent Growth Boom in Developing Economies: A Structural-Change Perspective. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan (p. 281-333). doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_9
9. Goyal, K. (2020). Structural Change and Growth of Manufacturing Industries in Punjab: Post-Reforms Analysis. Indian journal of economics and development. 16 (3), 389-396. doi.org/10.35716/IJED/20039
10. Bekkers, E., Koopman, R.B., Rêgo, C.L. (2021). Structural change in the Chinese economy and changing trade relations with the world. China Economic Review, 65. doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101573
11. Bhadury, S., Narayanan A. & Pratap, B. (2021). Structural Transformation of Jobs from Manufacturing to Services: Will It Work for India? The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15 (1), 22-49. doi.org/10.1177/0973801020976608
12. Tassinari, M., Barbieri, E., Morleo, G. & Di Tommaso, M.R. (2019). Targeted industrial policy and government failures: insights from the South Korean experience. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16 (2), 221-240. doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-02-2018-0110
13. Lin, Justin Yifu (2012). New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2232;
doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3
14. Shynkaruk, L.V. (Ed.). (2015). Structural transformations in the economy of Ukraine: dynamics, contradictions and influence on economic development. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv [in Ukrainian].
15. Sidenko, V. et al. (2017). Structural transformations in the global economy: Challenges for Ukraine. Кyiv: Zapovit [in Ukrainian].
16. Korablin, S.O. (2017). Macroeconomic dynamics of Ukraine: a trap of raw markets. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv. [in Ukrainian].
17. Kindzerski, Yuri (2021). Ukrainian economy facing the challenges of deindustrialization. In Concepts, strategies and mechanisms of economic systems management in the context of modern world challenges (p. 10-24). VUZF University of Finance, Business and Entrepreneurship. Sofia: VUZF Publishing House “St. Grigorii Bogoslov”.
18. Zymovets' V.V. (Ed.). (2019). Development of finance enterprises of the corporate sector of the economy of Ukraine. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv [in Ukrainian].
19. Bobukh, I.M. (Ed.). (2020). Structural changes as the basis of inclusive development of Ukraine's economy. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/332.pdf [in Ukrainian].
20. Yehorov, I.Yu. (Ed.). (2020). Formation of "reasonable specialization" in the economy of Ukraine. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/331.pdf [in Ukrainian].
21. Shovkun, I.A. (2018). Industrial development in decentralized conditions: experience of leading industrial countries and conclusions for Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting,, 4, 38-64. doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.04.038 [in Ukrainian].
22. Ostashko, T.O. (2019). Structural changes in world trade as a factor in the development of the domestic market of Ukraine. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Кyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/310.pdf [in Ukrainian].
23. Shovkun, I.A. (2020). Dependence of the Ukrainian economy from industrial imports and preconditions for the formation of effective production specialization. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Industry economy, 3, 5-27. doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2020.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
24. Bianchi, P., Labory, S. (2019). Manufacturing regimes and transitional paths: Lessons for industrial policy. Structural change and economic dynamics. Special Issue, 48, 24-31. doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.10.003
25. Stollinger, R. (2016). Structural change and global value chains in the EU. EMPIRICA. SI, 43: 4, 801-829. doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9349-z
26. Di Tommaso, M.R., Tassinari, M., Barbieri, E., Marozzi, M. (2020). Selective industrial policy and 'sustainable' structural change. Discussing the political economy of sectoral priorities in the US. Structural change and economic dynamics, 54, 309-323. doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.05.005
27. Krueger, Anne O. (2021, June 25). America’s Muddled Industrial Policy. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-innovation-competition-act-misguided-industrial-policy-by-anne-o-krueger-2021-06
28. Dietrich, A. (2012). Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries. Empirical Economics, 43, 915-944. doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0510-z
29. Andriansyah, Andriansyah & Nurwanda, Asep & Rifai, Bakhtiar (2020). Structural Change and Regional Economic Growth in Indonesia. MPRA Paper, 105177. University Library of Munich, Germany. doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1914320
30. Nguimkeu, Pierre; Zeufack, Albert G. (2019). Manufacturing in Structural Change in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper; 8992. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32317; doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8992
31. Mijiyawa, Abdoul' Ganiou; Conde, Lancine (2020). Structural Change and Productivity Growth in Guinea. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 9341. Retrieved from openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34259;
doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9341
32. Hrytsenko, A. (2016, 17 June). "Ukrainian economic miracle", or where are reforms? Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – The mirror of the week. Retrieved from zn.ua/ukr/macrolevel/ukrayinske-ekonomichne-divo-abo-kudi-vedut-reformi-_.html [in Ukrainian].
33. Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21, 1-33. doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3
34. McCaig, Brian; and Pavcnik, Nina (2017). Moving out of agriculture: Structural change in Viet Nam. In McMillan, Margaret S.; Rodrik, Dani; and Sepúlveda, Claudia (Eds.). Structural change, fundamentals, and growth: A framework and case studies (chapter 2, p. 81-124). Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institue (IFPRI). dx.doi.org/10.2499/9780896292147_ch2
35. Korablin, S.O. (2020, 20 August). Legacy and heirs. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – The mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from zn.ua/ukr/ukraina-1991-2020/spadok-i-spadkojemtsi-makroriven-za-29-rokiv-trendi-v-tsifrakh-do-dnja-nezalezhnosti.html [in Ukrainian].
36. Paskhover, O. (2021, February 11). Wooden toys. As Ukrainian furniture conquer the markets of Europe and not only. NV Biznes – NB Business, 5. Retrieved from nv.ua [in Ukrainian].
37. National Bank of Ukraine (2017, June). Financial Stability Report. Is. 3 [in Ukrainian].
38. Shovkun, I.A. (2019). Investment climate as a factor of industrial development in Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 70-103. doi.org/10.15407/eip2019.04.070 [in Ukrainian].
39. Zymovets', V.V., Shelud'ko, N.M., Shyshkov, S.Ye. (2021). Macroeconomic and institutional barriers "normalization" models of financing of enterprises in Ukraine. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Industry economy, 2 (94), 45-58. doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2021.02.045 [in Ukrainian].
№ 2/2023
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Influence of FDI on structural changes in the economy in the context of prospects for post-war recovery of Ukraine
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2023; 2:33-65 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2023.02.033 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The recovery of the national economy, which is undergoing great destruction as a result of full-scale Russian aggression in Ukraine, will require attracting not only domestic but also foreign investments. The post-war experience of various countries shows that the inflow of foreign capital contributed to meeting the needs for investment resources for the reconstruction of the economy and its structural modernization. The recent history of the rapid rise of newly industrialized countries also demonstrates that foreign investments enable the transformation of the structure of the recipient economy, and its progress towards higher levels of industrial development.
The purpose of this study is to conduct an analysis of the accumulation and sectoral distribution of FDI in the Ukrainian economy, to assess the effects of FDI to change the structure and dynamics of economic growth, and to identify approaches to attracting foreign investment in the context of prospects for post-war recovery and economic restructuring.
The article examines the accumulation of FDI in the Ukrainian economy in historical retrospect, analyzes the distribution of their reserves among the sectors and subsectors, as well as their geographical origin. The author assesses the depth of penetration of the FDI into the economy in general and into the technological sectors within the processing industry, in particular, and reveals various contradictory effects created by foreign investments for the development of the national economy, technological progress, and economic security.
Using regression modeling, the article investigates the FDI as a factor capable of contributing to the transformation of Ukraine’s economy, and changing the structural distribution of added value and employment between sectors. The simulation results confirm that the accumulation of FDI really affects the dynamics of GVA production and employment in economic sectors, that is, it causes structural shifts in the economy. At the same time, sectoral assessments reveal the mixed effectiveness of this factor in terms of the strength and direction of changes in the structure of the economy.
Keywords:foreign direct investments, structural changes in the economy, employment structure, industrial sector of the economy, manufacturing, technological structure of industry, post-war recovery of the economy
JEL: C2, F21, J21, L16, N4
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 33 - 65) | Download | Downloads :59 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Recovery and reconstruction of the post-war economy of Ukraine (2022). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. Horodnichenko, Yu., Solohub, I. & di Mauro, B.V. (Eds.). (2022). Reconstruction of Ukraine: principles and politics. CEPR PRESS [in Ukrainian].
4. Panchenko, Yu. (2022, October 21). World Bank: Western aid will not be enough to restore Ukraine. Private investment is required. Yevropeiska pravda – European truth. Retrieved from www.eurointegration.com.ua/interview/2022/10/21/7149062/ [in Ukrainian].
5. World Bank (2022). World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data Gross savings (% of GDP). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNS.ICTR.ZS
6. Skrypnychenko, M., Kuznietsova, L. & Bilotserkivets, O. (2022). Scenario based macro assessments of the post-war recovery of Ukraine's economy. Economy and forecasting, 3, 48-74. doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2022.03.019
7. Danylyshyn, B. (2022, December 28). Results of 2022 and tasks for 2023. Ekonomichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2022/12/28/695523/ [in Ukrainian].
8. Zymovets, V.V., Sheludko, N.M., & Shyshkov, S.Ye. (2021). Macroeconomic and institutional barriers of "normalization" of an enterprise’s financing models in Ukraine. Econ. promisl. – Economy of Industry, 2 (94), 45-58. doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2021.02.045 [in Ukrainian].
9. Bohdan, T. (2023, January 9). Ukraine's balance of payments: drastic changes during the war. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from zn.ua/ukr/macrolevel/platizhnij-balans-ukrajini-kardinalni-zrushennja-pid-chas-vijni.html [in Ukrainian].
10. Vinokurov, Ya. (2023, January 16). Borrowers stop paying their debts: how it will affect banks and the economy. Ekonomichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2023/01/16/695956/ [in Ukrainian].
11. Bohdan, T. (2022, December 21). Budget disturbances and declines. LB.ua. Retrieved from lb.ua/blog/tetiana_bohdan/539918_byudzhetni_zburennya_padinnya.html [in Ukrainian].
12. Wasser, S.F. & Dolfman, M.L. (2005, June). BLS and the Marshall Plan: the forgotten story. Monthly Labor Review, 44-52. Retrieved from stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/06/art4full.pdf
13. Eichengreen, B. (2011). Lessons from the Marshall Plan. World Development Report 2011 Background Papers. World Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from hdl.handle.net/10986/27506
14. Tarnoff, C. (2018, Jan. 18). The Marshall Plan: Design, Accomplishments, and Historic Significance. Congressional Research Service Report, 7-5700, R45079. Retrieved from www.crs.gov
15. Eichengreen, B. (2022, May 10) Shaping a Marshall Plan for Ukraine. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
16. Blomström M., Konan D. & Lipsey R. E. (2000, May). FDI in the Restructuring of the Japanese Economy. NBER Working Paper No. 7693. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w7693;
doi.org/10.3386/w7693
17. Rodrik D., McMillan M. & Sepúlveda C. (2016). Structural change, fundamentals, and growth. In M. McMillan, D. Rodrik, C. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Structural change, fundamentals, and growth: a framework and case studies (p. 1-38). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8962-9214-7
18. McMillan, M. & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, Structural Change, and Productivity Growth. In Making Globalization Socially Sustainable (p. 49-84). Geneva: International Labour Organization and World Trade Organization. doi.org/10.3386/w17143
19. Escobar, O. & Mühlen, H. (2018). The role of FDI in structural change: Evidence from Mexico. KCG Working Paper, 13. Kiel Centre for Globalization (KCG). Kiel. Retrieved from hdl.handle.net/10419/183188
20. Emako, E., Nuru, S. & Menza, M. (2022). The effect of foreign direct investment on structural transformation in developing countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10 (1). doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2125658
21. Wang, W., Xu, T., Liu, X., & Sun, Y. (2023). FDI inflows and income inequality: A Schumpeterian economic growth, International Review of Economics & Finance, 83(C), 805-820. doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.10.023
22. Alviarez, V.I., Chen, Ch., Pandalai-Nayar N., Varela, L., Yi K.-M. & Zhang H. (2022, September). Multinationals and structural transformation. NBER Working Paper 30494. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w30494; doi.org/10.3386/w30494
23. Carbonell, J.B. & Werner, R.A. (2018). Does Foreign Direct Investment Generate Economic Growth? A New Empirical Approach Applied to Spain. Economic Geography, 94 (4), 425-456. doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1393312
24. Paul, J. & Feliciano-Cestero, M. M. (2021). Five decades of research on foreign direct investment by MNEs: An overview and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 124, 800-812. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.017
25. Swapnil, S., Hillemane, M. & Subrahmanya, B. (2020). Growth and Structural Change in the Indian Economy An Analysis of Pattern, Determinants, and Outcomes. Economic and political weekly, 55 (26-27), 65-70.
26. UNCTAD (2022). World Investment Report 2022. International tax reforms and sustainable investment. Retrieved from unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2022
27. UNCTAD (2018). World Investment Report 2018 Investment and New Industrial Policies. Retrieved from unctad.org/
28. UNIDO (2020). Industrial Development Report 2020. Industrializing in the digital age. Retrieved from www.unido.org/resources-publications-flagship-publications-industrial-development-report-series/idr2020
29. Acemoglu, D. (2022, Oct. 28). China’s Economy Is Rotting from the Head. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
30. McCaig, B. & Pavcnik, N. (2016). Moving Out of Agriculture: Structural Change in Viet Nam. In M. McMillan, D. Rodrik, C. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Structural change, fundamentals, and growth: a framework and case studies (p. 81-124). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
31. Muhlen, H. & Escobar, O. (2020). The role of FDI in structural change: Evidence from Mexico. The World Economy, 43, 557-585. https ://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12879
32. Lee, K. (2023, Feb. 24). Will the New Industrial Policy Work? Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
33. Rodrik, D. (2022, Feb. 9). Reviving Appropriate Technology. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
34. Lee, K. (2021, Oct. 11). China's Loss Can Be Southeast Asia's Gain. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
35. Zhai, W., Sun, S. & Zhang, G. (2016). Reshoring of American manufacturing companies from China. Operations Management Research, 9, 62-74. doi.org/10.1007/s12063-016-0114-z
36. Moyo, D. (2022, Nov. 17). What should jittery China investors do? Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
37. El-Erian, M. A. (2023, Mar. 8). Fragmented Globalization. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
38. Zeng, K. & Liang, W. (2022). Chapter 1: Introduction: trade wars past and present: causes, dynamics and consequences. Research Handbook on Trade Wars. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi.org/10.4337/9781839105708
39. De Ville, F. (2023, January). The return of industrial policy in the European Union. GIES Occasional Paper: Global Energy Crisis. Ghent Institute for International and European Studies. Retrieved from www.ugent.be/ps/politiekewetenschappen/gies/en/research/publications/gies_papers/2023-global-energy-crisis
40. Kuzub, A. (2023, Jan. 13). US leverages its relationship with Taiwan to help rebuild the domestic semiconductor industry. Northeastern Global News. Retrieved from news.northeastern.edu/2023/01/13/tsmc-investment-us-taiwan/
41. Tyson, L. & Mendonca, L. (2023, Jan. 2). America’s New Era of Industrial Policy. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
42. Qian, N. (2023, Apr. 14). Banning China from Owning US Farmland Will Achieve Nothing. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from www.project-syndicate.org/
43. Chellaney, B. (2022, Dec. 4). A spotlight on Chinese debt bondage. The Japan Times. Retrieved from www.japantimes.co.jp/
44. Palivoda, A. (2019, August 16). China, which lacks everything. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from zn.ua/ukr/finances/kitay-yakomu-vse-malo-320867_.html [in Ukrainian].
45. Havlik, P., Hunya, G. & Zaytsev, Y. (2018, June). Foreign Direct Investments: A Comparison of EAEU, DCFTA and Selected EU-CEE Countries. WIIW Research Report, 428.
46. Bruno, R.L., Campos, N. F. & Estrin, S. (2021). The Effect on Foreign Direct Investment of membership in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59 (4), 802-821. doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13131
47. Jensen, C. (2002). Foreign direct investment, industrial restructuring and the upgrading of Polish exports, Applied Economics, 34: 2, 207-217. doi.org/10.1080/00036840010025641
48. Kruse, M., Somcutean, C. & Wedemeier, J. (2023). Productivity, Smart Specialisation, and Innovation: Empirical findings on EU macro-regions. Region, 10:1, 1-18. doi.org/10.18335/region.v10i1.419
49. Elekes, Z., Boschma, R. & Lengyel, B. (2019). Foreign-owned firms as agents of structural change in regions. Regional Studies, 53: 11, 1603-1613. doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1596254
50. Movchan, V., Rogoff, K. (2022). International trade and foreign direct investment. In Yu. Horodnichenko, I. Solohub, & B.V. di Mauro (Eds.), Reconstruction of Ukraine: principles and politics. CEPR PRESS [in Ukrainian].
51. Tucha, O. (2021). Balance of payments: essence, latest trends, methodological curiosities. Retrieved from bank.gov.ua/admin_uploads/article/Tucha_pr_23-24.12.2021.pdf?v=4 [in Ukrainian].
52. UNCTAD (2022). Foreign direct investment stock by group of economies. UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2021. Retrieved from hbs.unctad.org/foreign-direct-investment/
53. OECD (2022). FDI stocks (indicator). Retrieved 2022, November 21 from doi.org/10.1787/80eca1f9-en
54. Inward FDI stocks by industry (indicator). Retrieved 2022, November 22 from doi.org/10.1787/2bf57022-en
55. Ryasny, D. & Maksymchuk, M. (2021, December 22). Ihor Mazepa: More investors leave the country than come. Ekonomichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2021/12/22/680883/ [in Ukrainian].
56. National Bank of Ukraine (2022). Estimate of the volume of foreign direct investments in which the final controlling investor is a resident (round tripping) for 2010-2021. Retrieved from bank.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
57. Zymovets, V.V. (2020). About the adaptation model of financing capital investments in Ukraine. In Vectors of evolution and prospects of entrepreneurship in the conditions of modern challenges: a collection of materials of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Economic Prospects of Entrepreneurship", (October 8-9, 2020, Irpin) (part 1, p. 220-224 [in Ukrainian].
58. Goryunov, D., Prokhorov, B., Samoiluk, M. & Nozdrin V. (2022, November 29). Oligarchic Ukrainian capital. Analytical note. Center for economic strategy. Retrieved from ces.org.ua/oligarchic-ukrainian-capital-research/ [in Ukrainian].
59. Zymovets, V.V. (Ed.). (2019). Development of finances of enterprises of the corporate sector of the economy of Ukraine. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
60. Damgaard, J. & Sánchez-Muñoz, C. (2022, December 7). United States Is World's Top Destination for Foreign Direct Investment. Retrieved from www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2022/12/07/
61. Kozyuk, V. (2018, August 11). Oligarchic hydra of foreign direct investment. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina – Mirror of the week. Ukraine. Retrieved from zn.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
62. The Firtash’s titanium-magnesium plant in Zaporizhzhya was returned to state ownership - the final decision (2022, May 24). Ukrinform. Retrieved from www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/3491282-zaporizkij-titanomagnievij-kombinat-firtasa-povernuli-u-derzvlasnist-ostatocne-risenna.html [in Ukrainian].
63. Lia, D. & Valentinib, G. (2022). When are acquisitions a viable catch-up strategy? Some empirical evidence from China. Long Range Planning. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102265
64. Gordiychuk, D. (2021, December 14). $5 billion arbitration: details of the Chinese lawsuit in the Motor Sich case. Ekonomichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/news/2021/12/14/680663/ [in Ukrainian].
65. Solonina, E. (2020, December 8.). Ukraine, China, the USA and "Motor Sich": who owes whom 3.5 billion dollars. Radio Svoboda. Ekonomika. – Radio Svoboda. Economy. Retrieved from www.radiosvoboda.org/a/ukraine-usa-china-motor-sich/30988840.html [in Ukrainian].
66. The SBU accused a Russian oligarch of destroying ZALK. The actions of "RusAl" were recognized as sabotage (2015, July 21.. LB.ua. Retrieved from lb.ua/economics/2015/07/21/311509_sbu_obvinila_rossiyskogo_oligarha.html [in Ukrainian].
67. Zaporizhzhia Industrial Aluminum Plant Joint Stock Company (2022). Clarity Project. Retrieved from clarity-project.info/smida/00194122?year=2020 [in Ukrainian].
68. Pylypiv, I. (2023, March 18.). ARMA transferred the assets of a Russian businessman in the Chernihiv region for more than 1 billion. Ekonomichna pravda – Economic truth. Retrieved from www.epravda.com.ua/news/2023/03/18/698188/ [in Ukrainian].
69. Rodrik, D., Diao, X. & McMillan, M. (2019). The Recent Growth Boom in Developing Economies: A Structural-Change Perspective. In The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics (p. 281-333). Palgrave Macmillan. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_9
70. Shovkun, I. (2021). Structural shifts: impact on productivity and growth of Ukraine's economy. Economy and forecasting, 3, 53-70. doi.org/10.15407/econforecast2021.03.053
71. Shovkun, I. (2022, September). The Structure Transformation of the Ukraine’s economy in the war conditions. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky – Theoretical and applied issues of economics, 1 (44), 133-44. doi.org/10.17721/tppe.2022.44.12 [in Ukrainian].
72. Shovkun, І. (2020). Dependence of Ukrainian economy on industrial import and prerequisites of forming effective industrial specialization. Econ. promisl. – Economy of Industry, 3 (91), 5-28. doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2020.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |