Статті автора : Купе Том № 2/2004
Творчі дискусії з проблем інформаційно-знаннєвої політикиКУПЕ Том
Кількісне оцінювання ефективності роботи вчених-економістів
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2004; 2:76-88 | |
АНОТАЦІЯ ▼
Розглядаються сучасні проблеми об’єктивного вимірювання результатів наукової роботи, наводяться приклади таких досліджень щодо складання рейтингів підрозділів економічних наук університетів, кафедр, а також окремих вчених-економістів, розкриваються методи кількісного визначення якості досліджень і викладання, що застосовуються для атестації науково-педагогічних кадрів
Ключові слова:
| Стаття українською мовою (cтор. 76 - 88) | Завантажити | Завантажень : 227 |
СПИСОК ЛІТЕРАТУРИ ▼
1/ Ault, D., Rutman, G. and Stevenson, T. (1979). Mobility in the Labor Market for Academic Economists // American Economic Review. – Vol. 69. – P. 148–153.
2/ Ault, D., Rutman, G. and Stevenson, T. (1982). Some Factors Affecting Mobility in the Labor Market for Academic Economists // Economic Inquiry. – Vol. 20. – P. 104–132.
3/ Becker, W. and Watts, M. (1999). How Departments of Economics Evaluate Teaching // American Economic Review. – P. 344–349.
4/ Brauninger, M. and Haucap, J. (2002). What Economists Think of Their Journals and How They Use Them: Reputation and Relevance of Economics Journals // University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg Discussion Paper 111.
5/ Broder, I. (1993). Professional Achievements and Gender Differences among Academic Economists // Economic Inquiry. – Vol. 31. – P. 116–127.
6/ Cawley, J. (2003). A Guide (and Advice) for Economists on the U. S. Junior Academic Job Market // Cornell Working Paper.
7/ Combes, P. and Linnemer, L. (2001). Measuring and Ranking Economics Throughout Europe // CREST working paper.
8/ Coup?, T (2003). Revealed Performances. Worldwide Rankings of Economics Departments and Economists // Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming.
9/ Ehrenberg, R. and Monks, J. (1999). The Impact of U.S. News and World Report College Rankings on Admissions Outcomes and Pricing Policies at Selective Private Institutions // NBER working paper 7227.
10/ Ehrenberg, R. (2003). Method or Madness? Inside the USNWR College Rankings //CHERI working paper.
11/ Grimes, P. and Register, C. (1997). Career Publications and Academic Job Rank: Evidence from the Class of 1968 // Journal of Economic Education. – Winter 1997. – P. 82–91.
12/ Hamermesh, D., Johnson, G. and Weisbrod, B. (1982). Scholarship, Citations and Salaries,: Economic Rewards in Economics // Southern Economic Journal. – Vol. 49. – Nr.2. – P. 472–481.
13/ Garfield, E. (1990). Who will win the Nobel Prize in Economics? Here’s a Forecast Based on Citation Indicators // Current Contents. – Vol. 11. – P. 3–7.
14/ Hamermesh, D. (1989). Why Do Individual-Effects Models Perform So Poorly? The Case of Academic Salaries // Southern Economic Journal.
15/ Hamermesh, D. and Schmidt, P. (2003). The Determinants of Econometric Society Fellows Elections // Econometrica. – Vol. 71 (1). – P. 399–407.
16/ Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership and Job Design // Journal of Law Economics and Organization. – Vol. 7. – P. 24–51.
17/ Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics // Journal of Economic Perspectives. – Vol. 10. – Nr. 3. – P. 153–158.
18/ Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. and Stengos, T. (2001). Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics // University of Cyprus working paper.
19/ Lubrano, M., Bauwens, L., Kirman, A. and Protopopescu, C. (2002). Ranking European Economic Departments: a Statistical Approach // GREMAQ working paper.
20/ Masson, P., Steagall, J. and Fabritius, M. (1997). Economics Journal Rankings by Type of School: Perceptions Versus Citations // Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics. – Vol. 36. – Nr. 1. – P. 69–79.
21/ Medoff, M. (1996). A Citation-Based Analysis of Economists and Economics Programs // The American Economist. – Vol. 40. – P. 46–59.
22/ Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J.(1992). Economics, Management and Organization // Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
23/ Mirucki, J. (1999). A Visibility Analysis of the Scientific Production of Ukrainian Economists: 1969-94 // Journal of Socio-Economics. – Vol. 28. – P. 185–196.
24/ Moore, W., Newman, R. and Turnbull, G. (2001). Reputational Capital and Academic Pay // Economic Inquiry. – Vol. 39. – Nr. 4. – P. 663–671.
25/ Nichols, A. and Soper, J. (1972). Economic Man in the Classroom // Journal of Political Economy. – Vol. 80. – P. 1069–1073.
26/ Sauer, R. (1988). Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coautorship in Economic Academia // Journal of Political Economy. – Vol. 96. – Nr. 4. – P. 855–866.
27/ Taylor, J. (1995). A Statistical Analysis of the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A. – P. 241–261.
28/ Siegfried, J. and Scott, C. (1999). American Economic Association Universal Academic Questionnaire // American Economic Review. – P. 499–502.
29/ Scott, L. and Mitias, P. (1996). Trends in rankings of Economics Departments in the U.S.: an Update // Economic Inquiry. – Vol. 34. – P. 378–400.
30/ Tuckman, H., Gapinski, J. and Hagemann, R. (1977). Faculty Skills and the Salary Structure in Academe: A Market Perspective Author // American Economic Review. – Vol.67. – P. 692–702.
Ukrainian
English 
Русский 
