Articles by : Isakova N. № 2/2005
Economy and the formation of the new system of economic management
ISAKOVA N. 1, KRASOVS'KA O. , WELTER Friderike , SMALLBONE David
1G.M. Dobrov Center for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies
Small business in Ukraine: gender analysis
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2005; 2:123-135 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
Based on the results of a survey of entrepreneurs in Ukraine a gender analysis of the state and functioning of small enterprises is carried out. The evaluations of entrepreneurs of external conditions and main obstacles to start-up and development of small enterprises are generalized. The authors conclude that female entrepreneurs are similar to male entrepreneurs in terms of demographic characteristics and perceptions of external obstacles to business, but are different with regard to availability of resources to start business, level of investment and performance.
Keywords:
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 123 - 135) | Download | Downloads :517 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Scott C.E. Why more women are becoming entrepreneurs, Journal of Small Business Management, 1986, 24 (4), P. 37–44.
2. Cromie S. Similarities and differences between women and men who chose business proprietorship, International Small Business Journal, 1987, vol. 5, No 3, P. 43–60.
3. Brush C. Research on women business owners, past trends, a new perspective and future directions, Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice, Summer, 1992, Vol. 16, Issue 4, R. 5–26.
4. Fay. M, Williams L. Gender bias and the availability of business loans, Journal of Business Venturing, 1993, vol. 8, P. 363–376.
5. Catley S, Hamilton, R.T. Small business development and gender of owner , Journal of Management Development, 1998, Vol. 17, No 1 , P. 75–82.
6. Isakova N. Gendernye skhodstva i razlichiya v deyatel`nosti i ocenkakh ukrainskikh predprinimatelej, Sociologiya, teoriya, metody, marketing, 2001, № 2, S. 144–153.
7. Carter S, Anderson S, Shaw E. Women’s business ownership, a review of the academic, popular and Internet literature, Report to the Small Business Service, 2001, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
8. Baygan G. Improving knowledge about women’s entrepreneurship OECD Second Conference on Women Entrepreneurs in SMEs, Realising the Benefits of Globalisation and the Knowledge-Based Economy, 2000, 29–30 November http,//
www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/industry/indcomp (Офіційний веб-сайт ОЕСР
9. Bruno M. Women and the culture of entrepreneurship, in Mary Buckley (ed.) Women and the culture of entrepreneurship, Post-Soviet women, from Baltic to Central Asia, Cambridge University Press, 1997, P.56–74.
10. Barsukova S. Zhenskoe predprinimatel`stvo, osobennosti i perspektivy , Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, 1999, № 9, S. 75–84.
11. Women and Entrepreneurship. Unpublished report, Kiev International Institute of Sociolology, USAID Newbiznet project, Kiev, 2000.
12. Verheul I, Thurik R. Start-up capital, Does gender matter? , Small Business Economics, 2001, vol. 16, P. 329–345.
13. Report of National Foundation for Women Business Owners (NFWBO), Center for Women $s, Business Research, 1999 ,
www.nfwbo.org (Ofitsiynyi veb-sayt Natsionalnoi fundatsii dilovykh zhinok).
14. Hokkanen P, Lumme A, Autio E. Gender-Based Non-Differences in Bank Shopping and Credit Terms Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1998, Wellesley, Mass, Babson College,
www.babson.edu entrep fer (Ofitsiynyi veb-sayt koledzhu Bebson).
15. Coleman S. Access to Capital, A Comparison of Men and Women-Owned Small Businesses Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1998, Wellesley, Mass, Babson College
www.babson.edu entrep fer (Ofitsiynyi veb-sayt koledzhu Bebson).
№ 2/2014
Innovative transformations of the economic developmentGRYGA Vitalii Yuriyovych1, BOHDAN S. 2, ISAKOVA N. 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Ukrainian-Russian Institute – Branch of V.Chornomyrdin Moscow State Open University
3G.M. Dobrov Center for Scientific and Technological Potential and Science History Studies
Performance of innovation activity of small enterprises in the collaboration with large business
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2014; 2:94-104 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
The paper is devoted to analysis of the impact of two factors on economic efficiency of small enterprises. The first one is their innovative activities and the second one is their cooperation with large enterprises. The research was done based on data collected by authors during a survey of small enterprises' managers in Chernihiv region. The methodology of the research is based on the analysis of variance techniques of the received data. To perform it, all data were put on ordinal ranking scale and were analyzed using T-test and One-way ANOVA methods. The results of the analysis confirmed the idea that innovation and economic efficiency are interconnected issues. Moreover, the strongest impact on the income of small enterprises is made by technological innovation (e.g. new products, use of new materials and new technologies) rather than organizational improvements. Also, it was proved that cooperation between small and large enterprises positively influences the innovation and economic performance of small companies, in particular in case of production cooperation as well as permanent interaction between them.
Keywords: innovation, cooperation, small businesses, economic efficiency
JEL: L25; O39
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 94 - 104) | Download | Downloads :557 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Oslo Manual (2005). Guidelines for collectingand interpreting innovation data. OECD, Eurosat, ,
epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/OSLO/EN/OSLO-EN.PDF
2. Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. (Eds) (1993). Small firms and entrepreneurship: an East-West perspective. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2–14.
3. Storey, D.J. (1998). Understanding the small business sector. London, International Thomson Business Press.
4. Smallbone, D., Welter, F. (2009). Entrepreneurship and small business development in post-socialist economies. Abingdon, U.K., Routledge.
5. Isakova, N.B. (2012). Predpriyatiya Ukrainy : innovacionnaya deyatel'nost' i setevye vzaimodejstviya. Kiev, GP "Informacionno-analiticheskoe agentstvo".
6. Dryga, S.G. (2009). Male pidpryjemnyctvo Ukrai'ny: stanovlennja, mehanizmy upravlinnja ta pidtrymky, monografija. Kiev.
7. Varnalij, Z.S. (2005). Male pidpryjemnyctvo: osnovy teorii' i praktyky, Kiev, T-vo "Znannja", KOO.
8. Chubarjeva, L.I. (2008). Malyj biznes: teorija, mehanizmy pidtrymky stanovlennja ta rozvytku, dys. ... kand. ekon. Nauk, spec. 08.00.01 "Ekonomichna teorija ta istorija ekonomichnoi' dumky". Donec'kyj nacional'nyj universytet Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrai'ny, Donec'k,.
9. Cyganec', V.V. (2008). Ocinka i aktyvizacija innovacijnogo rozvytku malogo pidpryjemnyctva v Ukrai'ni, dys. … kand. ekon. nauk, spec. 08.00.03 "Ekonomika ta upravlinnja nacional'nym gospodarstvom". Naukovo-doslidnyj centr industrial'nyh problem rozvytku NAN Ukrai'ny, Harkiv.
10. Dijal'nist' sub'jektiv malogo pidpryjemnytstva, 2012 (2013). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrai'ny.
11. Naukova ta innovacijna dijal'nist' v Ukrai'ni (2010). Kiev, DP "Informacijno-vydavnychyj centr Derzhkomstatu Ukrai'ny".
12. OECD. National innovation systems (1997)
www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf>
13. Jashhyshyna, I.V. (2012). Ekonometrychna ocinka vplyvu innovacijnyh chynnykiv na social'no-ekonomichnyj rozvytok Ukrai'ny. Problemy Nauky, 10, 41–47.
English
Русский 
Ukrainian 
