Articles by : Haidutsky A. № 4/2004
Innovative transformations of the economic developmentHAIDUTSKY A.
Assessment of investment attractiveness of an economy
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2004; 4:119-129 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
Under consideration are methodological approaches to quantitative measurement and assessment of investment attractiveness of the economy. The author proposes a model to assess investment attractiveness, which includes a set of techniques: from selection of indicators to construction of the graph for the rating investment objects.
Keywords:
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 119 - 129) | Download | Downloads :357 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Alymov A.N, Emchenko V.N. Konkurentosposobnost` nacional`noj ekonomiki, K, 2001, 59 s, Prepr. NAN Ukrainy. In-t ekonomiki; 2001.
2. Blank I.A. Finansovyj menedzhment, K., MP "YTEM LTD", "Iunayted London Treyd Lymyted", 1995, 448 s.
3. Bugrova O. Metodologichni otsinky ryzyku pry pryyniatti investytsiynykh rishen , Ekonomika Ukrainy, 2003, №10, S. 29-33.
4. Gubanova L.I. Otsinka investytsiynykh proektiv , Finansy Ukrainy, 2001, №10, S. 126–131.
5. Gutkevich S.A. Investicionnaya privlekatel`nost` agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki, K., Yzd-vo Evrop. un-ta, 2003, 251 s.
6. Zaychykova V.V. Osoblyvosti vykorystannia metodu porivnialnogo analizu v galuzi mistsevykh finansiv, Naukovi pratsi NDFI, 2003, №3, S. 200–212.
7. Ivanov Yu.B. Konkurentosposobnost` predpriyatiya v usloviyakh formirovaniya rynochnoj ekonomiki, Khar`kov, KhGEU, 1997, 246 s.
8. Ivanenko V.M. Kurs ekonomichnogo analizu, Navch. posibnyk, K., Znannia-Pres, 2000, S.19–20, 26–27.
9. Kozmenko S, Vasylieva T, Leonov S. Bagatorivneva systema pryyniattia investytsiynykh rishen, Ekonomist, 2001, № 6, S. 52–57.
10. Kreydych I. Metodologichni pidkhody do vyznachennia efektyvnosti regionalnykh investytsiynykh proektiv i program , Ekonomika. Finansy. Pravo, 2002, №3, S. 28–30.
11. Luchko M. Pryamye inostrannye investicii, dvizhenie i znachenie , Ekonomist, 2002, № 3, S. 22–32.
12. Malova T, Seliverstova L. Rozvytok metodychnykh zasad reytyngovoi otsinky investytsiynoi pryvablyvosti aktsionernykh pidpryiemstv , Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 2003, №2 (20), S. 40–43.
13. Nosova O.V. Otsinka investytsiynoi pryvablyvosti Ukrainy, osnovni pidkhody, Ekonomika ta prognozuvannia, 2003, № 3, S. 119–137.
14. Onikiienko S. Oblikovi metody otsinky investytsiynoi pryvablyvosti , Visnyk Natsbanku Ukrainy, 2001, № 7, S. 49–51.
15. Stalinskaya E. Ocenka investicionnoj privlekatel`nosti regionov Ukrainy, Ekonomst, 2003, № 9, S. 68–72.
16. Shepitsen A.O. Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti agrarnogo pidpryiemstva , Finansy Ukrainy, 2003, № 8, S. 66.
17. Index of economic freedom in 1999. Washington D.C. ed. K.R.Holmes, Johnson. The Heritage Foundation. The Wall Street Journal. Washington D.C., New York, 1999, P.9.
18. New scoreboard of Economic Intelligence Union ranks business climate across the world , Transition Newsletter , 2001, Vol.12, № 3, P. 47–48.
№ 3/2006
Economics of agriculture
HAIDUTSKY A.
Assessment of investment attractiveness of the agrarian sectors
in CEE countries
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2006; 3:131-140 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
As an important condition of the development of investment process in the agrarian sector should be qualified the evaluation of investment attractiveness of agrarian industry as well as determination of the main indicators with the greatest influence on the improvement of the capital flow to agriculture. In the article, using regressional-correlational analysis, the author tries to determine the dependence of the level of FDI inflow in agriculture on the current parameters of the agrarian sector. It has been proved that the indicators with the greatest influence on the level of foreign investment in the region's agriculture are labor productivity and the share of imports in gross output
Keywords:
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 131 - 140) | Download | Downloads :266 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Makariy N. Otsinka investytsiynoi pryvablyvosti ukrainskykh pidpryiemstv , Ekonomist, 2001, № 10, S. 52–60.
2. Ostashko T.O. Agrarni transformatsii v perekhidnykh ekonomikakh, perspektyvy dlia Ukrainy, Ekonomika i prognozuvannia, 2003, № 1, S. 59–69.
3. Syvolapenko N. Investytsiyna pryvablyvist Ukrainy , Ekonomist, 2002, № 6, S. 84–85.
4. Sadik D. A taylor-made common agricultural policy for the accession countries. The role of agriculture in Central and Eastern European rural development, engine of change or social buffer? IAMO Institute, 2004, Vol. 25, 416 p.
5. Agricultural policies in OECD countries , OECD 2003, Paris, OECD Publications, 2003, 293 pages.
6. Matsybora T.V. Priami inozemni investytsii v ekonomitsi perekhidnogo periodu , Ekonomika APK, 2003, № 8, S. 100–105.
7. Gaydutskyi A.P. Klasyfikatsiia chynnykiv investytsiynoi pryvablyvosti ekonomiky, Rynok tsinnykh paperiv Ukrainy, 2004, № 9–10, S. 9–14.
English
Русский 
Ukrainian 
