Articles by : Makarkina G. № 4/2008
Forecasting methods and models
MAKARKINA G.
Optimization model of economic development of an industrial region under the conditions of information uncertainty
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2008; 4:139-151 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author proposes a quantitative justification of the optimal trajectory of economic development of an industrial region as the most important subsystem of national economy under the conditions of inversive market-oriented transformation. Due to the peculiarities of information reflection of the functioning of a regional system as an instrument of choice of the optimal alternative, the previous dynamic input-output model was not sufficiently clear. That is why, on its basis, the author carries out a new assessment of optimal trajectory of Donetsk region with regard to investments in energy-saving technologies at different forecasting horizons
Keywords:
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 139 - 151) | Download | Downloads :231 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Transformatsiyni protsesy ta ekonomichne zrostannia v Ukraini , za red. akad. NAN Ukrainy V.M.Heytsia, Kharkiv, Fort, 2003, 440 s.
2. Innovatsiyno-tekhnologichnyi rozvytok ekonomiky, za red. akad. NAN Ukrainy V.M Heytsia, akad. NAN Ukrainy V.P.Semynozhenka, chl.-kor. NAN Ukrainy B.Ye.Kvasniuka, K , Feniks, 2007, 564 s.
3. Granberg A.G., Modelirovanie socialisticheskoj ekonomiki, M,: Ekonomika, 1988, 487 s.
4. Blagun I.S, Sysak L.I, Soltysik O.O, Modeliuvannia stalogo rozvytku regionu, Ivano-Frankivsk, Vydavnycho-dyzaynerskyi viddil Tsentru informatsiynykh tekhnologiy, 2006, 166 s.
5. Grygorkiv V.S, Yakutova E.Yu., Modeliuvannia optymalnogo ekonomichnogo rostu z urakhuvanniam ekologo-ekonomichnoi rivnovagy ta podatku na dodanu vartis,t Ekonomichna kibernetyka , № 5–6, 2004, S. 24–31.
6. Kyzym M.O, Kononova K.Yu, Modeliuvannia strategii i investytsiynoi diialnosti Kharkivskogo regionu, Finansy Ukrainy, 2002, № 10, S. 22–28.
7. Modelirovanie ekonomicheskoj dinamiki , T.S.Klebanova, N.A.Dubrovina, O.Yu.Polyakova i dr, Khar`kov, INZhEK, 2005, 243 c.
8. Leont`ev V.V., Ekonomicheskie esse, M., Polytyzdat, 1990, 415 s.
9. Sergienko I.V, Mikhalevich M.V, Stecyuk P.I, Koshlaj L.B., Mezhotraslevaya model` planirovaniya strukturno-tekhnologicheskikh izmenenij , Kibernetika i sistemnyj analiz, 1998, № 3, S. 3–17.
10. Prognozirovanie kapitalisticheskoj ekonomiki, M., Mysl`, 1970, 448 s.
11. Ermol`ev Yu.M, Yastremskij A.I.,Stokhasticheskie modeli i metody v ekonomicheskom planirovanii, M., Nauka, 1979, 253 s.
12. Zade L.A.,Ponyatie lingvisticheskoj peremennoj i ego primenenie k prinyatiyu priblizhennykh reshenij, M., Myr, 1976, 165 s.
13. Melikhov A.N, Bernshtejn L.S, Korovin S.Ya., Situacionnye sovetuyushie sistemy s nechetkoj logikoj, M., Nauka, 1990, 272 s.
14. Makarkina G.V, Dobryden K.M. ,Modeliuvannia vplyvu energozberigaiuchykh tekhnologiy na rozvytok ekonomiky industrialnogo regionu, Finansy Ukrainy, 2007, № 10, S. 42–50.
15. Statystychna zvitnist pidpryiemstv Donetskogo regionu za formoiu №1-pidpryiemnytstvo (richna) Zvit pro osnovni pokaznyky diialnosti pidpryiemstva, Oblasne upravlinnia statystyky, Donetsk, 2000–2003.
16. Dodatok do formy №1-pidpryiemnytstvo (richna) Rozshyfrovka materialnykh vytrat ta poslug storonnikh organizatsiy, Oblasne upravlinnia statystyky, Donetsk, 2000–2003.