Articles by : Artomova Т. № 3/2003
Economic theory
ARTOMOVA Т. 1
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Methodology of the institutionalism in the context of value theory
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2003; 3:108-118 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author argues that the imperfect market architectonics of transition societies provokes the “slippage” of economic reforms. At the same time the process of creating an adequate economic institutions system so far lacks sufficient theoretical justification. The latter should not be based on the postulates of institutional theory. Instead, it should be built by joint efforts of classical, neo-classical, and institutional trends of modern economic science. In the author’s opinion, the methodological platform of such synthesis can be the concepts of economic value and that of integral economic space-time entity.
Keywords:
| Article in Russian (pp. 108 - 118) | Download | Downloads :234 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Skrypnychenko M, Prykhodko T. Pidsumky rynkovykh peretvoren ta pronoz rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy do 2005 roku Ekonomist, 2001, №1, S.26–36.
2. Statystychni tablytsi z Poslannia Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 15.04.2003 r. Ekonomist, 2003, № 6.– S. 46–91.
3. Olejnik A. Institucional`naya ekonomika, M, 2000.
4. Moskovskij A.I. O predmete i metode sovremennoj ekonomicheskoj nauki , Vestn. MGU,. Seriya 6, Ekonomika, 2002, №3, S. 21–39.
5. Rajzberg B.A, Lozovskij L.I, Starodubceva E.B. Sovremennyj ekonomicheskij slovar`, M, 1999.
6. Nort D. Instituty, institucional`nye izmeneniya i funkcionirovanie ekonomiki , Per. s angl, M, 1997.
7. Nureev R.M. Teoriya obshestvennogo vybora. Glava 3. Stanovlenie i razvitie predmeta i metoda teorii obshestvennogo vybora, Voprosy ekonomiki, 2002, №10, S. 126–151.
8. Shveri R. Teoriya racional`nogo vybora, universal`noe sredstvo ili ekonomicheskij imperializm?, Voprosy ekonomiki, 1997, № 7, S. 35–51.
9. Nureev R.M. Teoriya obshestvennogo vybora. Glava 1. Obshestvennyj vybor, metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie predposylki analiza, Voprosy ekonomiki, 2002, № 8, S. 122–149.
10. Kouz R. Firma, rynok, pravo , Per. s angl, M, 1993.
11. Gricenko A. Evolyuciya stoimosti , Ekonomika Ukrainy, 2001, №4, S. 45–55.
12. Anan`in O.I. Ekonomicheskaya nauka v zerkale metodologii , Voprosy filosofii, 1999, № 10, S. 135–151.
13. Kutyrev V.A. Opravdanie bytiya (yavlenie nigitologii i ego kritika), Voprosy filosofii,2000, № 5, S. 15–32.
14. Tul`chinskij G.L. Slovo i telo postmodernizma. Ot fenomenologiii nevmenyaemosti k metafizike svobody, Voprosy filosofii, 1999, № 10, S. 35–53.
15. Baev I, Kozhin S. Diversifikaciya promyshlennykh predpriyatij v SShA, MEiMO, 2001, №10, S. 85–91.
16. Kolesnikova L. Predprinimatel`stvo, ot “maksimizacii pribyli” k sinergii social`no-ekonomicheskikh sistem , Voprosy ekonomiki, 2001, №10, S.40–49.
17. Urmanov I. Sinergicheskie svyazi kak novaya model` organizacii proizvodstva , MEiMO, 2000, № 3, S. 19–26.
18. Kheyzynga Y. Osen Srednevekovaia, Per. s angl, M, 1989.
19. Williamson O. Transaktion Cost Economics. Handbook of Industrial Organization, td. By R. Cshmalensee and R. D. Willing. Elsvier Science Publishers , B. V, 1989 , Vol. 1.
20. Arkhiereev S.I. Transakcionnye izderzhki i neravenstvo v usloviyakh rynochnoj transformacii, Kh, 2000.
English
Русский 
Ukrainian 
