HOME PAGE | |
№ 2/2010
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The socio-economic approach to modeling the development of Ukraine’s agrarian sector
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2010; 2:100-113 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The paper discusses current trends and challenges in agriculture and rural area of Ukraine and main approaches to sustain-able development strategies. Presented stochastic economic-mathematical model aims on sustainable strategy for further agriculture development. Discussed some empirical experimental results of modeling on the level of regions of Ukraine
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 100 - 113) | Download | Downloads :487 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. O. Tarassevych. Ukraine: Livestock and Products, Annual GAIN Report, UP4014, 2004, www.fas.usda.gov/psd
3. I. Prokopa and O. Popova. Depopulation in Rural Areas of Ukraine: Destructive Changes and Threats (in Ukrainian), Interim Report, Institute of Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine, 2008 (Instytut ekonomiky ta prognozuvannia NAN Ukrainy).
4. Ermolieva T, G. Fischer, and H. van Velthuizen (2005). Livestock Production and Environmental Risks in China: Scenarios to 2030”, FAO IIASA Research Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
5. Fischer G, Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y, Sun L (2008). Riskadjusted approaches for planning sustainable agricultural development. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 1–10.
6. Y. Ermoliev, R. Wets (eds.), 1988, Numerical techniques of stochastic optimization, Computational Mathematics, Berlin, Springer Verlag.
7. Oleksandra Borodina. Food Security and Socioeconomic Aspects of Sustainable Rural Development in Ukraine. Interim Report IR09053, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria, 2009.
8. Fischer, G, Ermolieva, T, Ermoliev, Y, and van Velthuizen, H. (2007), Sequential downscaling methods for Estimation from Aggregate Data. In K. Marti, Y. Ermoliev, M. Makowski, G. Pflug (Eds.), Coping with Uncertainty, Modeling and Policy Issue, Springer Verlag, Berlin, New York.
9. Agriholdings in Ukraine: Good or Bad? German–Ukrainian Policy Dialogue in Agriculture, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting, Policy Paper Series, AgPP, No 21 , 2008.
№ 2/2015
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Complementarity principle in scientific research: an interdisciplinary discourse
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2015; 2:47-58 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2015.02.047 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article aims oncriticalanalys is of understanding the definition of "complementari-ty"indifferentscientific sectors. Outlined general characteristics of complementarity, which cause the necessity to use complementary approaches in research of modern socioeconomic processes.
Complementarity, as one of the basic characteristics of human being (economic, social, environ-mental, cultural, etc.) has a general meaning; its philosophical value consists in the fact that, opposite to unilateral approaches, using complementarity approaches becomes an important step forward in understanding supplement of rational and irrational in a developing economy.
The Idea of complementarity came into modern economic theories from theoretical approaches in the different spheres of science. This led to the development of new methodological principles in the economic theories, which stand for the principle of multiple interests in the person’s desire to coope-rating and complementing instead of struggling. A person, using complementarity principle, accepts the environment as a complex complementary system, and, as a result, understands the fact that any invasion into the system becomes a subject and object of socioeconomic development, where the social and the economic become a single unit, that cannot be separated.
Socioeconomic unity formed through complementarity and cooperation of economic subjects, is accompanied by parallel cultural changes, which are, in turn, a result of economic development and increase in welfare, so people are enabled to more effective self-fulfillment and social protection. Under such conditions, complementarity as a part of interaction between different groups of population brings motivation for more effective coordination and complementary activities, which increase economic effectiveness of and ensure sustainable development.
Economic activities are, in most cases, connected with a significant impact on the environment, which strongly require a complementary interaction between society, economics and ecology. As of now, the need to find new components in social and economic being is crucial, as it will allow to prevent irreversible impact on the environment and motivate to careful use of natural resources.
Actualization of the complementarity in the analysis of the results of economic transformations in former USSR countries is determined by the need of understanding them as a whole, in connection with institutional and sociocultural approaches. In spite of a broad opportunities of the institutional approach in research of transformational processes, there is a need of moving beyond and investigate economic and social processes through cultural tendencies, i.e. to complement the institutional understanding of the society with the sociocultural one.
Keywords: complementary principle, interdisciplinary approach, complementarity
JEL: O1
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 47 - 58) | Download | Downloads :806 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. The principle of subsidiarity. Retrieved from cyclowiki.org/wiki/ Printsip dopolnitelnosti (filosofiya) [in Russian].
3. Fiske, Alan Page (2000). Complementarity Theory: Why Human Social Capacities Evolved to Require Cultural Complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (1), 76-77. doi: doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_7
4. Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1942). The Crisis of Our Age: the social and cultural outlook. Dutton. doi: doi.org/10.2307/2262488 [in Ukrainian].
5. Pushkarev, E.A. Russian and international justice: problem common ground. Retrieved from teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2007/1/pushkarev.pdf [in Russian].
6. Fon Vizer, Fridrih. The theory of the social economy. Retrieved from www.libertarium.ru/lib_mbv_v [in Russian].
7. Lypov, V.V. (2010). Institutional complementarity: from the model of the market economy to the concept of multiple variants of capitalism. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 2, 47-48 [in Ukrainian].
8. Lypov, V.V. (2009). Measurement and evaluation of institutional complementarity: challenges and tools. Naukovi pratsi Donetskogo natsionalnogo tehnichnogo universitetu, Seriya: ekonomichna – Scientific papers of Donetsk national technical University. Series: economic, 37-1, 62 [in Russian].
9. Lypov, V.V. (2010). Institutional complementarity: from the model of the market economy to the concept of multiple variants of capitalism. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 2, 49 [in Ukrainian].
10. Lypov, V.V. (2011). Institutional complementarity socio-economic systems. Kharkiv: The Kharkov national University named after V. N. Karazin, 9-24 [in Russian].
11. Lypov, V. (2014). J. Arrig vs Paul Krugman: fatal strategies and complementary origins of the global financial crisis. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 1, 47-48 [in Ukrainian].
12. Lypov, V.V. (2010). Institutional complementarity: from the model of the market economy to the concept of multiple variants of capitalism. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 2, 49 [in Ukrainian].
13. Gritsenko, A.A. (2014). Complementarity as a methodological principle of the logical-historical study of socio-economic development of Russia and Ukraine. Socio-economic development of Russia and Ukraine: contradictions and complementarity. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS, 51-80 [in Russian].
14. Campbell, J., (2011). The US financial crisis: lessons for theories of institutional complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 211-234. doi: doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq034
15. Heyets, V.M. (2014). Complementarity and contradiction in social and economic modernization of Ukraine and Russia. Socio-economic development of Russia and Ukraine: contradictions and complementarity. Moscow, Institute of Economics, RAS, 11-50 [in Russian].
16. Balabanyts, A.V., Say, D.V. (2014). Technology planning strategic changes in the system of marketing management of enterprises cooperation. Teoryya y praktyka upravlenyya – Theory and practice of management, 1, 34 [in Ukrainian].
17. Balabanyts, A.V. (2011). Integrated management system of marketing interaction: abstract dis. Donetsk: Donetsk national University of Economics and trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-Baranovsky [in Ukrainian].
18. Stepanenko, V.V. (2004). Economic efficiency of meat production in agricultural enterprises and the formation of its market : author. dis. Kyiv: National Agrarian University [in Ukrainian].
№ 4/2017
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Imperatives of complementary development in agrosphere
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2017; 4:125-136 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.04.125 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Modern vector of agriculture policy development in leading countries is oriented to complementary characteristics of agro-food systems, where production of actual and public goods are combined. Taking into account the complementary nature of connections between agriculture and rural developments, specific policy regulations and financial instruments are used in order to keep the proper balance. For transition to such policy-making in Ukrainian realities, it makes sense to start using the term "agrosphere" as a united subject of state regulation and state financial support instead of the currently used term "agro-industrial complex" or agrarian sector. Introduction of the term of agrosphere in the policy-making process would ensure that regulation is made for a multi-level and multi-functional system, covering social, economic and environmental aspects, directly connected with food self-fulfillment and export potential fulfillment.
Complementarity in agrosphere development is envisioned as interconnection between agriculture and rural area, under which, as a result of their cooperation, effectiveness of the production, and welfare of rural population increase and broad recovery of production resources is ensured in a certain territory. Transition to complementary development of agrosphere consists in the introduction of the new system of state regulation, which can protect traditional agriculture and village based on public understanding of their complementary nature and form general opposition to the current state of relations between agro-business, natural resources and rural communities. This would require significant public expenditures (first of all financial), involvement of socially responsible private investments and environmentally safe technologies, and specific political instruments, in particular science-based socioeconomic planning on the national level.
Keywords: argosphere, complementary development, agriculture, village, inter-connection of agriculture production, rural communities and rural area
JEL: Q 10, O 18
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 125 - 136) | Download | Downloads :559 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Ukraine's agro-sphere in XXI century (2001). Visnyk NAN Ukrainy – Bulletin of NAS of Ukraine, 10. Retrieved from www.visnyk-nanu.kiev.ua/2001-10/3.htm [in Ukrainian].
3. Sozinov, A.A., Pridatko, V.I., Shtepa, Ju.N. (2005). Agro-sphere: visualization with the use of ERS and GIS to indicate the condition of the agriculture and evaluate agrarian biodiversity. Ahrobioriznomanittia Ukrainy: teoriia, metodolohiia, indykatory, pryklady – Agrarian biodiversity of Ukraine: theory, methodology, indicators, examples, book 1. Kyiv: Nichlava [in Russian].
4. Kobets', M.I. (2004). Organic agriculture in the context of sustainable development. Project "Agrarian policy for human development", 5. Retrieved from www.undp.org.ua/agro/pub/ua/P2004_01_051_04.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Trehobchuk, V., Pradun, V. (2004). Agrarian sphere: a model of sustainable development. Visnyk NAN Ukrainy – Bulletin of NAS of Ukraine, 9, 5 [in Ukrainian].
6. Popova, O.L. (2009). Sustainable development of the agrosphere of Ukraine: policies and mechanisms. Kyiv: Institute for economics and forecasting [in Ukrainian].
7. Popova, O.L. (2012). Agro-sphere: socio-economic content and foundations for sustainable development. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 5, 73-84 [in Ukrainian].
8. Pashaver, B. (2004). Profitability of the agro-sphere: problems of stability. Jekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2, 73-82 [in Russian].
9. Pashaver, B. (2011). Development scenarios for the agro-sphere. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 11, 38-44 [in Ukrainian].
10. Kulynych, P.F. (2014). Legal support of environmental safety of the agro-sphere: formulating the problem. In Urgent problems of the organization and development of environmental law in Ukraine: proceedings of the scientific-practical round table (Kyiv, 28 March 2014), p. 79-82. Kyiv Taras Shevchenko National University. Chernivtsi: Kondrat'ev A.V. [in Ukrainian].
11. Kurman, T.V. (2014). Agrosphere as a basis of sustainable development of the agricultural production. Naukovyj visnyk Natsional'noho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy – Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bio-Resources and Use of Nature of Ukraine, 197: 2, 48–54 [in Ukrainian].
12. Krysanov, D.F. (1998). Agrarian sphere: priorities and realization mechanisms. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
13. The Big Soviet Encyclopedia (19730. 3rd Edition, Moscow: "Soviet Encyplopedia" [in Russian].
14. Lypov, V.V. (2010). Institutional complimentarity: From the model of market economy to the concept of multiple variants of capitalism. Ekonomichna teoriia – Economic theory, 2, 49 [in Ukrainian].
15. Judgement of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (a case of administrative and territorial organization), Kyiv, 13 July 2001 No 11-pn/2001. Case No 1-39/2001. Retrieved from zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v009p710-05 [in Ukrainian].
16. Urgent problems of modern agrarian theory and policy: treatise, All-Russia A.A.Nikonov Institute of Agrarian Problems and Informatics (2005). Jenciklopedija rossijskih dereven' – Encyclopedia of Russian Villages, 15, 212. Moscow: A.A.Nikonov Institute of Agrarian Problems and Informatics [in Russian].
17. Sustainable development of agriculture and rural areas: foreign and domestic experience and Russian problems (2005). Moscow: KMK Partnership [in Russian].
18. Agriculture at a Crossroads. The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development (IAASTD): global report (2009). Retrieved from www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/Investment/Agriculture_at_a_Crossroads_Global_Report_IAASTD.pdf
19. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD). Summary of the Global Assessment for Policy Makers. Retrieved from www.unep.org/dewa/agassessment/docs/Global_SDM_270 608_Russian.pdf [in Russian].
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |