Articles by : Stasyuk Ol`ha Mykolaivna№ 1/2012
Economy under the conditions of modern transformations
STASYUK Ol`ha Mykolaivna1, BEVZ Iryna 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
An integral assessment of the competitiveness of Ukraine’s regions
| Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2012; 1:75-86 | |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors consider the issue of integral assessment of the competitiveness of Ukraine's regions. They investigate the existing methodological support for the assessment of the competitiveness of national regions, develop and propose their own methodological approach to the assessment of the competitiveness of a country’s regions and perform an integral assessment of the competitiveness of Ukraine’s regions
Keywords:competitiveness, region, integral index, rating, level of competitiveness, assessment
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 75 - 86) | Download | Downloads :330 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Nakaz KMU "Pro zatverdzhennia metodyky rozrakhunku integralnykh regionalnykh indeksiv ekonomichnogo rozvytku" vid 15.04.2003 r. № 114,
uazakon.com/documents/date_1a/pg_ibcnog/index.htm.
2. Postanova KMU "Pro zaprovadzhennia kompleksnoi otsinky sotsialnoekonomichnogo rozvytku Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym, oblastey, m. Kyieva i Sevastopolia" vid 20.06.2007 r. № 833,
zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi?nreg= 8332007%EF.
3. Postanova KMU "Pro zaprovadzhennia provedennia otsinky rezultativ diialnosti Rady ministriv Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym, oblasnykh, Kyivskoi ta Sevastopolskoi miskykh derzhavnykh administratsiy" vid 09.06.2011 № 650,
zakon1.rada.gov.ua/cgibin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=6502011%EF.
4. Artemenko V. Indykatory stiykogo sotsialnoekonomichnogo rozvytku regioniv, V.Artemenko, Regionalna ekonomika, 2006, № 2, S. 90–97.
5. Bezugla V.O. Integralna otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti regioniv Ukrainy, V.O.Bezugla, Komunalnoe khoziaystvo gorodov: nauchnotekhnycheskyi sbornyk, 2005, № 70, S. 53–60.
6. Gerasymchuk Z.V., Kovalska L.L. , Konkurentospromozhnist regionu: teoriia, metodologiia, praktyka, monografiia, Lutsk, Nadstyr’ia, 2008, 248 s.
7. Zander E.V., Ferova I.S., Inyukhina E.V. i dr., Integral`naya ocenka determinant konkurentosposobnosti regionov, EKO, 2007, № 11, S. 43–59.
8. Kovalska L.L. Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti regioniv derzhavy,
www.nbuv.gov.ua/.../zbirnuk_RE_2_98.pdf.
9. Kuzmin O.Ye. Upravlinnia mizhnarodnoiu konkurentospromozhnistiu pidpryiemstva, pidruchnyk, Lviv, KompaktLV, 2005, 304 s.
10. Lazarieva Ye.V., Yablonska N.V. , Metodychnyi pidkhid do otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti regionu, Regionalna ekonomika, 2011, № 1, S. 23–31.
11. Merkushov V.V. Yntegralnaia otsenka konkurentosposobnosty regyonov, http:/sopssecretary.narod.ru/Konferencya/Doclad/ Merkushov.doc.
12. Chajnikova L.N. Razrabotka metodiki ocenki konkurentosposobnosti regiona, Voprosy sovremennoj nauki i praktiki, 2008, № 4 (14). Tom 1, S. 154–166.
13. Zvit pro konkurentospromozhnist Ukrainy, 2010,
feg.org.ua/ua/cms/projects/studying_Ukraine_competitiveness.
14. Kytaiev O.V. Metodychni pidkhody do vyznachennia ekologoekonomichnogo reytyngu pidpryiemstva, Visnyk SumDU, 2003, № 5 (51), S. 64–70.
15. Umanets T.V. Otsinka investytsiynoi pryvablyvosti regionu za dopomogoiu integralnykh indeksiv, Ekonomika ta prognozuvannia, 2006, № 4, S. 133–146.
16. Gavura V.O. Instrumentariy otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti regioniv, Ekonomichnyi forum, 2011, № 4.
17. Getman O.O. Ekonomichna diagnostyka: navchalnometodychnyi posibnyk, Dnipropetrovsk, DUEP, 2006, 90 s.
18. Metody otsinky rivnia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva, toloka.hurtom.com/viewtopic.php?t=10686.
19. Pidvysotskyi V., Tkachuk R., Formuvannia ta vprovadzhennia program pidvyshennia konkurentospromozhnosti terytoriy: metodychni materialy, K., Lesta, 2010, 64 s.
20. Dotsenko O.S. Praktykum z zagalnoi teorii statystyky, navch. posibnyk, Sevastopol : SevNTU, 2010, 204 s.
21. Praktychni zaniattia z teorii ymovirnostey ta matematychnoi statystyky, metod. vkazivky, I.M.Zelepugina, O.A.Lagoda, N.T.Sennikova ta in., K., KNUTD, 2044, 80 s.
№ 1/2023
Economy under the conditions of modern transformations
NYKYFORUK Olena Ihorivna1, KUCHER Serhii Vladyslavovich2, STASYUK Ol`ha Mykolaivna3, FEDIAІ Natalia Oleksandrivna4
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2PrJSC "Ukrhydroenergo"
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
4Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Multiplication effects of investment in a publicly significant infrastructure project
ABSTRACT ▼
The article features results of the assessment of the multiplier effects for the national economy from the implementation of construction project of the first stage of production facility of the Dniester HPP for the period 2010-2019. For this purpose, macroeconomic statistics were processes, on whose basis an information system of primary and calculated indicators was created using the data from the project documentation, which became the basis for calculations. A methodological approach was developed to assess multiplier effects at the macroeconomic level using the input-output balance, which is reflected in the symmetrical "input-output" table. The authors highlight the main indicators, through which the impact of the implementation of the construction project of the Dniester HPP on Ukraine’s economy is manifested, and which allow assessing its socio-economic significance: the multiplier of the output growth of the economic activity "Construction" at the expense of project investments, the GVA multiplier for all economic activities from project investments, and the GDP multiplier (public expenditure multiplier). According to the implemented approach, multiplier effects for the economy are calculated via additional output growth, additional value added growth, and GDP growth on project investments.
Based on the obtained results, it is proved that: 1) the implementation of the construction project of the first stage of the production facility of the Dniester HPP had made it possible to accumulate a multiplier effect for Ukraine’s economy, confirming in practice the theory of multiplier effects and proving the efficiency of public capital investments; 2) to the greatest extent, the multiplier effect from the additional investment growth in this project is generated within the economic activity "Construction", which is explained by increased demand for domestically produced construction products.
Keywords:multiplier effect, multiplier, investments, input-output tables, input-output balance, infrastructure project
JEL: E270; E220
| Article in Ukrainian (pp. 97 - 114) | Download | Downloads :72 |
REFERENCES ▼
1. Kahn, R.F. (2011). The making of Keynes' general theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Keynes, J.M. (1937). The General Theory of Employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 472.
doi.org/10.2307/1882087
3. Boiko, M. (2016). Multiplication effect in tourism: limitations and opportunities. Intehratsiini protsesy na svitovykh rynkakh – Integration processes in world markets, 4, 23-32 [in Ukrainian].
4. Sholomytskyi, Yu., Deisan, I., Sholomytska, O., Onopriienko, A. and Shapoval, N. (2021). Assessment of the economic effects of the "Major construction" program in 2020-2023. Ukravtodor, Kiev School of Economics. Retrieved from
kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/GC_roads_construction_impact_final_compressed-1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Odintsov, O.M. (2015). Multiplicative effect of increasing internal reserves of agricultural production. Ekonomika APK – Economics of the agro-industrial complex, 3, 34 [in Ukrainian].
6. Trusova, N.V. and Demko, V.S (2020). World practice of evaluation of multiplicative effect of investments in the tourism services industry. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats TDATU imeni Dmytra Motornoho (ekonomichni nauky) – Collection of scientific works of Dmitry Motorny TDATU (Economic Sciences),1(41), 99-107.
doi.org/10.31388/2519-884X-2020-41-99-107 [in Ukrainian].
7. Lytvynenko, K.O. (2016). Multiplicative model of the investment impact on the business sector (commercial real estate case). Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: Practice and Experience, 16, 41-41 [in Ukrainian].
8. Dorohan, O.D. (2021). Multiplier in construction. Discussion. BRDO view. Nashi Hroshi – Our money. Retrieved from
nashigroshi.org/2021/01/26/mul-typlikator-v-budivnytstvi-dyskusiia-pohliad-brdo/ [in Ukrainian].
9. Chepeliev, M.H. (2012). Evaluation of multiplier effects for the branches of the economy of Ukraine: a retrospective analysis based on "expenditure-output" tables. Ekonomist – Ekonomist, 11, 74-76 [in Ukrainian].
10. Zakhidna, O.R., Patyts'ka, Kh.O. (2014). Determining the potential of investment projects and competitive advantages of the region based. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy, 8. Retrieved from
www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=3265 [in Ukrainian].
11. Odintsov, M.M. and Odintsov, O.M. (2011). Multiplicative impact of investments on the effectiveness of the development of the region. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: Practice and Experience, 9, 4-6 [in Ukrainian].
12. Prokopov, O.A. (2011). The multiplier effect of the competitiveness of the national economy on the international market of information services. Zhurnal Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut» – Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved from
economy.kpi.ua/uk/node/265 [in Ukrainian].
13. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2018). Methodological regulations on the organization of state statistical observation "Expenditure-Output Table". Retrieved from
www.ukrstat.gov.ua/metod_polog/metod_doc/2018/236/mp_tvv.pdf [in Ukrainian].
English
Русский 
Ukrainian 
