HOME PAGE | |
№ 3/2007
PROKOPA Ihor 1, POPOVA Olha Leontiivna2, BETLIY M. 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Rural employment in Ukraine: territorial differentiation
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2007; 3:56-74 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors consider regional peculiarities of rural employment in enterprise, organizations and subsidiary farms, as well as rural labor migration. For the first time, the available statisti-cal base for rural areas of 290 administrative rayons has been used and analyzed for that purpose. The article provides estimates of intra-region differentiation of rural employment
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 56 - 74) | Download | Downloads :734 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Ekonomichna aktyvnist naselennia Ukrainy 2005: Stat. zb. Derzhkomstat Ukrainy, K, 2005, S. 51.
3. Sotsialno-ekonomichne stanovyshe silskykh naselenykh punktiv Ukrainy: Stat. zb. Derzhkomstat Ukrainy, K, 2006, S. 44.
4. Zabezpechennia konkurentospromozhnosti agrarnogo sektora ekonomiky Ukrainy na vnutrishnomu i zovnishnomu rynkakh: Naukova dopovid, K.: In-t ekon. ta prognozuv, 2007, S. 216–218.
5. Ekonomichna aktyvnist naselennia Ukrainy 2005: Stat. zb. Derzhkomstat Ukrainy, K, 2006, S. 13.
6. Silskyi sektor Ukrainy na rubezhi tysiacholit: u 2 t. T. 2: Sotsialni resursy silskykh terytoriy L.O.Shepotko, I.V.Prokopa, S.O.Gudzynskyy, V.D.Yarovyy, K.: In-t ekon. NAN Ukrainy, 2003, S. 455.
7. Prokopchuk S. Bezrobitni v zakoni Uriadovyi kur’ier, 2007, 27 chervnia.
№ 1/2008
PROKOPA Ihor 1, POPOVA Olha Leontiivna2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The population pattern of the rural areas: destructive changes and dangers
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2008; 1:63-84 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors provide the results of research on the development of the demographic and settlement crisis in Ukraine’s rural areas for a long period (1991–2006). They define the tendencies, factors and the area of the crisis impact, and work out various proposals as to the improvement of methodology of the determination of its limits. The article provides the authors’ estimates of the changes in the rural demographic and settlement situation until 2015.
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 63 - 84) | Download | Downloads :775 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Kompleksnyi demografichnyi prognoz Ukrainy na period do 2050 r. (kolektyv avtoriv), za red. chl.-kor. NANU, d.e.n, prof. E.M.Libanovoi, K,: Ukrainskyi tsentr sotsialnykh reform, 2006, 138 s.
3. Naselennia Ukrainy-2004. Regionalni aspekty demografichnogo rozvytku, K., In-t demografii ta sotsialnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy, Derzhkomstat Ukrainy, 2004, 342 s.
4. Silskyi sektor Ukrainy na rubezhi tysiacholit: U 2-kh t, T. 2: Sotsialni resursy silskykh terytoriy, L.O.Shepotko, I.V.Prokopa, S.O.Gudzynskyy, V.D.Yarovyy, K., In-t ekonomiky NAN Ukrainy, 2003, S. 47–62.
5. Borodina O.M., Liudskyi kapital na seli: naukovi osnovy, stan, problemy rozvytku, K,: IAE UAAN, 2003, S. 63–72.
6. Andriychuk V.G, Zubets M.V, Yurchyshyn V.V., Suchasna agrarna polityka: problemni aspekty, K., Agrarna nauka, 2005, S. 21, 24.
7. Selo: suchasna polityka i strategiia rozvytku , L.Shepotko, I.Prokopa, O.Maksymiuk ta in, K., In-t ekonomiky NAN Ukrainy, 1997, S. 43–60.
8. Statystychnyi shorichnyk Ukrainy za 2006 rik , Derzhavnyi komitet statystyky Ukrainy, K., Konsultant, 2007, S. 335.
9. Sotsialno-ekonomichne stanovyshe silskykh naselenykh punktiv Ukrainy , stat. zb. , Derzhkomstat Ukrainy, K, 2006, S. 22.
10. Kompleksnyi demografichnyi prognoz Ukrainy na period do 2050 r. (kolektyv avtoriv), za red. chl.-kor. NANU, d.e.n, prof. E.M.Libanovoi, K., Ukrainskyi tsentr sotsialnykh reform, 2006, S. 114–115.
11. Social`naya traektoriya reformiruemoj Rossii: Issledovaniya Novosibirskoj ekonomiko-sociologicheskoj shkoly, red. kol., otv. red. T.I.Zaslavskaya, Z.I.Kalugina, Novosybyrsk, Nauka, Syb. predpryiatye RAN, 1999, S. 43, 45.
12. Petrushenko M., Chym bilshe pratsiuiemo, tym bilshyi vidchay bere , Uriadovyi kur’ier, 2008, 24 sichnia.
№ 2/2009
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Formation of the preconditions for multi-functional rural development: the investment aspect
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2009; 2:71-82 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The author considers the peculiarities of multi-functional development of Ukrainian village during the transformation period. He analyzes volumes and value structure of the facilities commissioned in rural areas in recent years, and assesses the direction of the investments made to rural development for the village to perform its multiple role
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 71 - 82) | Download | Downloads :675 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Silske gospodarstvo Ukrainy, 2007 : Stat. zbirnyk, Derzhkomstat Ukrainy, K., 2008, 391 s.
3. Chaban O. Tekhnologii novi, a resursy mistsevi, Uriadovyi kur’ier, 2008, 22 liutogo.
4. Pavlenko S. "Zayvi" liudy tezh khochut yisty, Golos Ukrainy, 2009, 30 sichnia.
№ 3/2010
PROKOPA Ihor 1, BERKUTA T. 2, BETLIY M. 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Podolsky State Agricultural and Technical University
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Differentiation of individual farms by the character of production: consequences of the market transformation
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2010; 3:74-89 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article analyzes the stratification of rural households by the character of their activities into con-sumer and market oriented ones and assesses the share of those having preconditions for develop-ment into western type farms. The authors justify the necessity of state support of the sector of indi-vidual farms
Keywords:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 74 - 89) | Download | Downloads :682 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Mel`nik L.Yu, Lyubovich A.A, Mel`nik L.L. Chastnye khozyajstva v agrarnom proizvodstve, Dnipropetrovsk: Sich, 1999, 169 s.
3. Svynous I.V. Simeyni gospodarstva agrarnogo sektora Ukrainy: stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku, Agroinkom, 2003, №1–2, S. 43–48.
4. Gorkavyi V.K, Goncharenko N.G. Tovarnist ta efektyvnist osobystogo pidsobnogo gospodarstva naselennia, Ekonomika APK, 2001, №12, S. 93–98.
5. Krysanov D.F, Prokopenko K.O. Samozayniatist silskogo naselennia v rynkovykh umovakh: masshtaby, strukturyzatsiia, perspektyvy, Derzhava ta regiony. Seriia: Ekonomika i pidpryiemnytstvo, Zaporizhzhia: ZIDMU, 2007, №1, S. 175–178.
6. Vytraty i resursy domogospodarstv Ukrainy u 2008 rotsi, stat. zb, K.: Derzhavnyi komitet statystyky, 2009 r, 434 s.
7. Chernichenko V.V. Ekonomichni chynnyky vidtvorennia trudovogo potentsialu agrarnoi sfery, avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk.stupenia kand. ekon. nauk, K. OIE NAN Ukrainy, 2005, S.11.
№ 3/2012
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, PROKOPA Ihor 2, KYRYZIUK S. 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Commercialization of the farming households as a way of improving the rural incomes
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2012; 3:79-91 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article reveals the opportunities and key factors of the increase of farming households’ incomes by way of their implementation in the market agro food system. Typical households groups have been excreted on the basis of socio-demographic characteristics. It was ascertained that the current socio-economic policy is not able to solve the problem of rural poverty. As a result, more than half of the families with children, who shape the future of the Ukrainian village, belong to the poorest households. Therefore, the authors justify the need of a policy to support the incomes of rural families in order to improve their commercialization. Using the statistical method of grouping and matching, the authors identified various key factors of the commercialization of agricul-tural activities of selected social groups of rural households and their economic effect, which is increasing the incomes from the sale of agricultural products. It was estimated that the highest effect for improving welfare of the poor rural households can be achieved through increasing land in use (extensive method) or raising technical and technological and innovation support (intensive method) of the households agricultural activity. The calcula-tions confirm the highest income increase is possible with the joint effect of the two factors, which requires the increase in the land area in use up to 2 ha and annual expenditures on agricultural activities, within the techno-logical feasibility, in the amount of UAH 2-3 thousand. The authors suggest to provide the necessary level of expenditures though the implementation of targeted state support for selected household groups over a period of up to 5 years in exchange for their guaranty to improve the level of commercialization.
Keywords:private peasant farm, agrarian activities, market orientation, factors of commercialization
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 79 - 91) | Download | Downloads :832 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. S.Davidova, L.Fredriksson and A.Bailey, Subsistence and Semisubsistence Farming Households in Selected EU New Member States, University of Kent, 2009, 23 r.
3. Paciorkovskij V.V. Sel`skaya Rossiya: 1991–2001 gg., M., Finansy i statistika, 2003, S. 211–215.
4. Keyzer, M.A, S.Pande. Classification by crossing and polling for integrated processing of maps and surveys. An addendum to GRCPsoftware, Working Paper 0704, Amsterdam, SOWVU.
№ 1/2015
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Life support of rural population: consequences of the old reforms and reference points of the new ones
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2015; 1:121-130 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2015.01.121 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Changes in key segments of the life support system of rural population during reforming agricultural and social sectors and the reasons which caused them have been analyzed. It is shown that in general there was a deterioration of rural infrastructure and access of population to public goods. The declared quality improvement of education and health services in terms of service concentration and closure of corresponding establishments were not achieved. At the same time, in suburban and recreational zones, the process of the urbanization of rural environment accelerated.Here and generally in Ukraine, the volume of rural house construction increased as well as the level of engineering equipment of housing stock.
The author revealed the opportunities to improve living conditions in rural areas on the basis of higher citizens' initiative, community cohesion and development of state-public partnership. This will be contributed by measures to decentralize power and economy and reform the sphere of life support based on de-monopolization and de-concentration of public services.
The author justifies the guidelines to solve the problems concerning life support of rural population by improving the state agrarian policy and directing it to achieve the objectives of rural development such as increasing incomes of peasants of all forms of participation in agricultural production and attracting businesses to the development of rural communities. It is necessary to clearly position the interest of agricultural sector in the preservation and development of rural settlement network.
Keywords: agricultural policy, state-public partnership, de-centralization, life support, reforming, social sphere, rural development
JEL: Q18, O18
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 121 - 130) | Download | Downloads :867 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Popova, O.L. (2014). Support for housing construction in rural areas "own house": a regional section. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and Forecasting, 1, 97-104 [in Ukrainian].
3. Availability households durables (according to sampling household survey in October 2012. Derzhstat Ukrai'ny – State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2013 [in Ukrainian].
4. Onyshhenko, O. (2014). Brought to clean water. Dzerkalo tyzhnja. Ukrai'na – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 27 [in Ukrainian].
5. Likarchuk, I. Time shouting SOS. Dzerkalo tyzhnja. Ukrai'na. – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 2014, 5 August, 28 [in Ukrainian].
6. Sakalo, O., Kacalap, V., Lukomec,' G. etc. (2011). Not so cue stick. Ukrai'na moloda – Young Ukraine, 22 September [in Ukrainian].
7. Dovgal', S. (2012). Reform – a hack. Ukrai'na moloda – Young Ukraine, 4 Apr. [in Ukrainian].
8. Smetanjuk, B. (2013). Kolaps without anesthesia. Ukrai'na moloda – Young Ukraine, 20-21 December. [in Ukrainian].
9. Shymko, M., Kalynjak, O. (2013). Ghetto, only without the wire? Ukrai'na moloda – Young Ukraine, 17 October [in Ukrainian].
10. Koval'chuk, V., Kosyns'ka, Ju. Pilot Sapo. Ukrai'na moloda – Young Ukraine, 2013, 7 November [in Ukrainian].
11. Self population health status and availability of certain types of medical care (2010–2013). Retrieved from ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/17/Arch_sdrd_zb.htm [in Ukrainian].
12. Klochek, G. (2014). Secondary education reform needed shock. Dzerkalo tyzhnja. Ukrai'na – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 26, 18, July [in Ukrainian].
13. Likarchuk, I. Time shouting SOS. Dzerkalo tyzhnja. Ukrai'na – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 2014, 28, 15 August [in Ukrainian].
14. The concept of education in Ukraine period 2015-2025, project. Retrieved from mon.gov.ua/ua/pr-viddil/1312/1390288033/1414672797 [in Ukrainian].
15. Klochek, G. (2014). Education for the Future. Dzerkalo tyzhnja. Ukrai'na – Mirror of the week. Ukraine, 18 September, 33 [in Ukrainian].
16. The concept of a new national health systems Ukraine, project. Retrieved from www.apteka.ua/article/295842 [in Ukrainian].
17. The correct way of going, gentlemen. Ukrai'na moloda – Ukraine young, 2013, 7 February [in Ukrainian].
18. Bila under the European flag. Ukrai'na moloda – Ukraine young, 2013, 18 December [in Ukrainian].
19. USIF received another grant from the Government of Germany for social development. Retrieved from usif.org.ua/uk/novini/175-2013-10-14-10-41-45.html [in Ukrainian].
20. Borodina O.M., Prokopa I.V. (Eds) (2010). Theory, Policy and Practice Rural Development. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 376 p. [in Ukrainian].
21. Heyets, V.M., Borodina, O.M., Prokopa, I.V. (Eds) (2012). Ukrainian model of agricultural development and its socio-economic reorientation. Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 56 p. [in Ukrainian].
22. More on Local Development Funds. In Heyets V.M., Borodina O.M., Prokopa I.V. (Eds) (2012). "Ukrainian model of agricultural development and its socio-economic reorientation". Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 48 [in Ukrainian].
№ 3/2015
PROKOPA Ihor 1, OSTASHKO Tamara Oleksiivna2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
From normative to positive paradigm of bookkeeping theories
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2015; 3:158-159 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Keywords:
JEL:
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 158 - 159) | Download | Downloads :802 |
REFERENCES ▼
№ 2/2016
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, PROKOPA Ihor 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The village and peasantry at the juncture of opportunities and the crossroad of hope
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2016; 2:129-144 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2016.02.129 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors provide a socioeconomic assessment of the processes that have taken place in rural areas and the agricultural sector after the establishment of Ukraine's political independence. They reveal the controversial nature of agrarian reforms resulted in the unnecessarily polarized dual structure of agriculture and the divergence between agricultural and rural development.
In agriculture, a division of activities between different groups of producers took place. Growing the high tech export oriented crops together with the profits from trading them were monopolized by the agricultural holdings. The marginally profitable production of labor-intensive products was concentrated in private farms, which are the most numerous representatives of the underdeveloped family-style farming. All that has restricted the resources for economic and social development of rural communities and led to a situation in which, with the growth of agricultural output, the rural areas are degrading.
The article shows that the Ukrainian village remains a scene of social reforms in three areas: agriculture, social services and local government. Its future will greatly depend on how well the process of reform will ensure the priority interests of rural community and the general public over the commercial goals of big business.
Keywords: agricultural policy, agrarian reform, the dual structure of agriculture, rural employment, rural infrastructure, rural development, reform of local government
JEL: О15, Q18
Article in English (pp. 129 - 144) | Download | Downloads :1024 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Onyschenko, O. M. (2006). The formation and functioning of organizational structures of the market type. The agrarian sector of Ukraine towards European integration (p. 170–179). Uzhhorod: IVA [in Ukrainian].
3. Yurchyshyn, V. V. (2009). Agricultural policy in Ukraine at the turn of eras. Historical and socio-economic essays. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
4. Yurchyshyn, V. V. (2013). Modern agrarian transformation in Ukraine. The retrospective essays in three parts. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
5. Hajduts'kyj, P. I. (2015). Agricultural reform of Leonid Kuchma in Ukraine. Kyiv: TOV "Informatsijni systemy" [in Ukrainian].
6. Borodina, O. M., Heyets, V. M., Hutorov, A. O. [et all]. (2012). The Ukrainian model of agrarian development and its socio-economic reorientation. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
7. Borodina, O. M. (2007). Peculiarities of creation of extra large agricultural companies under conditions of insufficient legislative regulation in Ukraine. Superlarge farming companies: emergence and possible impacts. Retrieved from agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi–bin/view.pl
8. Prokopa, I. V., Berkuta, T. V. (2011). Households in modern agricultural production and rural development. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, PROKOPA Ihor 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
The village and peasantry at the juncture of opportunities and the crossroad of hope
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2016; 2:132-147 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The authors provide a socioeconomic assessment of the processes that have taken place in rural areas and the agricultural sector after the establishment of Ukraine's political independence. They reveal the controversial nature of agrarian reforms resulted in the unnecessarily polarized dual structure of agriculture and the divergence between agricultural and rural development.
In agriculture, a division of activities between different groups of producers took place. Growing the high tech export oriented crops together with the profits from trading them were monopolized by the agricultural holdings. The marginally profitable production of labor-intensive products was concentrated in private farms, which are the most numerous representatives of the underdeveloped family-style farming. All that has restricted the resources for economic and social development of rural communities and led to a situation in which, with the growth of agricultural output, the rural areas are degrading.
The article shows that the Ukrainian village remains a scene of social reforms in three areas: agriculture, social services and local government. Its future will greatly depend on how well the process of reform will ensure the priority interests of rural community and the general public over the commercial goals of big business.
Keywords: agricultural policy, agrarian reform, the dual structure of agriculture, rural employment, rural infrastructure, rural development, reform of local government
JEL: О15, Q18
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 132 - 147) | Download | Downloads :848 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Onyschenko, O. M. (2006). The formation and functioning of organizational structures of the market type. The agrarian sector of Ukraine towards European integration (p. 170–179). Uzhhorod: IVA [in Ukrainian].
3. Yurchyshyn, V. V. (2009). Agricultural policy in Ukraine at the turn of eras. Historical and socio-economic essays. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
4. Yurchyshyn, V. V. (2013). Modern agrarian transformation in Ukraine. The retrospective essays in three parts. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
5. Hajduts'kyj, P. I. (2015). Agricultural reform of Leonid Kuchma in Ukraine. Kyiv: TOV "Informatsijni systemy" [in Ukrainian].
6. Borodina, O. M., Heyets, V. M., Hutorov, A. O. [et all]. (2012). The Ukrainian model of agrarian development and its socio-economic reorientation. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
7. Borodina, O. M. (2007). Peculiarities of creation of extra large agricultural companies under conditions of insufficient legislative regulation in Ukraine. Superlarge farming companies: emergence and possible impacts. Retrieved from agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi–bin/view.pl
8. Prokopa, I. V., Berkuta, T. V. (2011). Households in modern agricultural production and rural development. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
№ 1/2017
PROKOPA Ihor 1, DEMCHAK I. 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Ukrainian Research Institute of the Productivity of Agro-Industrial Complex
Identification of small agricultural producers: European experience for Ukraine
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2017; 1:58-71 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2017.01.058 |
ABSTRACT ▼
One of the areas of improvement of state agrarian policy in Ukraine is increasing support for small farms. However, there is still no common position on the division of agricultural producers by economic size. For identifying it, it seems appropriate to take into account the practice of the European Union, where the typology of farms uses the indicator of economic size. It is based on the economic parameter of Standard Output (SO) and describes the possible value of production that the producer is able to get, with the available productive capacity and conducting business in a particular region.
The economic size of farms is determined based on their acreage and number of animals using regional SO ratios, which are calculated in the EU by relevant authorities. The farms are classified by economic size in 14 classes ranging from "less than 2 thousand Euros" to "more than 3 mln Euros." Within the system, there are groups of small, medium and large farms.
Ukraine needs to adopt the European approach to assessing the size of the farms, in which the group of small sized farms would include individual farms (households), peasant family farms and small sized economically independent farms. It is necessary to immediately start to build a national system of determination of farm size in terms of the economic parameter of Standard Output. During the transition period, it is expedient to temporarily assess the economic value of farms using an indicator as close as possible to the SO.
Keywords: agricultural producers, economic size, small farms, indicators of economic activities, the standard output
JEL: Q01, Q12
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 58 - 71) | Download | Downloads :842 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. The concept of state purpose oriented program for the development of agrarian sector for the period until 2020. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1437-2015-p. [in Ukrainian].
3. On the state support of agriculture in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine. Draft unofficial version. Retrieved from search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/NT 1447 [in Ukrainian].
4. Recommendation of the Commission hearings on `Transformation of Ukraine's agro-industrial complex. Encouragement of the functioning of family farms and their taxation`. Retrieved from farmer.co.ua/news/?id=&action=view&f_no=1362 [in Ukrainian].
5. Vovk, L. (2016, June 2). Government supports small farms. Uriadovyi kurier – Government courier [in Ukrainian].
6. Taras Kutovyi: I am afraid that this year we won't have 100 bln Hrn. Mass media interview of the Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine Taras Kutovyi (2016, May 11). Retrieved from agropolit.com/interview/100-taras-kutoviy-ya-zvertavsya-z-propozitsiyeyu-zbilshuvati-finansuvannya-ale-boyusya-scho-tsogorich-10-mlrd-grn-ne-bude [in Ukrainian].
7. Zbarskyi, V.K. (2011). Development of the sector of small commercial farms in Ukrainian rural settlements. Kyiv: NATs. IAE [in Ukrainian].
8. Kyrylov, Yu.Ye., Osadchuk, I.V. (2010). Development of small rural businesses under the conditions of globalization. Ekonomika APK – Economy of agroindustrial complex,7, 91-97 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pitiulych, M.M., Voronych, K.M. (2014). Teoretical aspects of the research on small businesses. Naukovyi visnyk Mukachivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ser.: Ekonomika – Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo state University. Economics, 1, 26-28. Retrieved from www.msu.edu.ua/visn/?cat=8&lang=uk [in Ukrainian].
10. Skrypnyk, S. (2016). Categories and distinction criteria of small rural businesses. Agricultural land Resourse Economics, 2:2, 27-35. Retrieved from www.art-journal/com [in Ukrainian].
11. Economic Code of Ukraine. Retrieved from urist-ua.net/... [in Ukrainian].
12. Hubeni, Yu.E., Voronyi, I.V., Kovalskyj, A. (2009). FADN system as a tool for collection and systematizing of economic information in the agrarian sphere EU. Naukovyi visnyk Volynskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky – Scientific Bulletin of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 15, 85-90 [in Ukrainian].
13. Raszeja-Ossowska, Iwona. Economic size of a farm (ESU value and indicator SO). Retrieved from www.dotacje.pl/dla-rolnikow/wielkosc-ekonomiczna-gospodarstwa-rolnego-wartosc-esu-wspolczynnik-so/ [in Polish].
14. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1242/2008 of 8 December 2008 establishing a Community typology for agricultural holdings EU-Lex. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008R1242
15. Bocian, Monika, Cholewa, Izabela, Tarasiuk, Rafal (2014). Indicators of standard production in 2010 for the purposes of EU Farm Typology. Warsaw, State Research Institute of Agrarian and Food Economy, Department of Agrarian Accounting. Retrieved from docplayer.pl/5056261-Wspolczynniki-standardowej-produkcji-2010-dla-celow-wspol¬notowej-typologii-gospodarstw-rolnych-opracowal-zespol.html [in Polish].
16. Co to jest wielkosc ekonomiczna gocpodarstw? (SO). Retrieved from www.sir-kielce.pl/index.php/664-618 [in Polish].
17. General tendencies of development of farmers' businesses in Ukraine. (2016). Kyiv: Research Institute "Ukrahropromproduktyvnist" [in Ukrainian].
18. Kutovyi will ask Ministry of Finance for assigning 500 mln Hrn for small and medium farmers. Retrieved from agronews.ua/node/65580 [in Ukrainian].
19. Ukrainian agrarian business: how find a way out the crisis. Retrieved from http:// agravery.com/uk/posts/show/ak-ukrainskomu-agrarnomu-biznesu-vijti-z-krizi [in Ukrainian].
20. Aid for small farms in Poland in the new financial perspective of 2014-2020. (2013, August). Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Warszawa. Retrieved from https:// www.yumpu.com/xx/document/view/50091809/pomoc-dla-malych-gospodarstw-rolnych-w-polsce [in Polish].
21. The first all-Ukrainian general agricultural census. Retrieved from www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ pvzsp_2012/pvzsp_2012.htm [in Ukrainian].
№ 4/2018
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, KYRYZIUK S. 2, PROKOPA Ihor 3
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
3Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Farming potential of households: methodical approaches to evaluation and development
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2018; 4:106-115 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.04.106 |
ABSTRACT ▼
Based on extended interpretation of the essence of farming, the article outlines the boundaries of the farming segment in Ukrainian agriculture. This farming segment includes not only registered farms, but also those households, which meet the global farming criteria. The authors estimate the number of the households (personal peasant farms) of farmer type and their productive potential and prove that one of the top priorities in improving the mechanism of state support for farming is encouraging the households to institutionalize (formalize) their agricultural activities.
It is proposed to introduce a five-year program to provide financial assistance to the households (personal peasant farms) in order to expand the scale of their current agricultural output, to start new activities, and to increase the level of commercialization and subsequent formalization in the regulatory environment. The main provisions of the program were developed, such as the requirements for potential beneficiaries and the results of their participation in the program; conditions for the allocation and use of support funds; estimated number of participants; the need for budget financing etc. According to calculations, during the program period, it will involve 75 thousand households, who, after fulfilling all the stipulated conditions, will join the farm segment.
Keywords: state support, households, business plan, personal peasant farms (PPF), state support program, farmers potential, formalization of PPF activity
JEL: Q01, Q12
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 106 - 115) | Download | Downloads :728 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Hubeni, Yu.E., Koverko, Yu.A. (2017). Peasant farm development under administrative decentralization. Ekonomika APK – Economics of agro-industrial complex, 1, 68-73 [in Ukrainian].
3. Hubeni, Yu.E., Koverko, Yu.A., Olishchuk, P.O. (2017). Development of personal peasant farms under conditions of institutional changes. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 3, 59-67 [in Ukrainian].
4. Malik, M.Y., Shpykuliak, O.H. (2018). Trends and prospects of peasant farm development. Ekonomika APK – Economics of agro-industrial complex, 1, 11-19 [in Ukrainian].
5. Tulush, L.D., Hryshchenko, O.Yu. (2018). Transformation of commercial households into enterprises: taxes and budget aspects. Ekonomika APK – Economics of agro-industrial complex, 1, 40-52 [in Ukrainian].
6. Poczta, W., Szuba-Baranska, E., Beba, P., Czubak, W. (2015). Strukturalna i ekonomiczna różnorodność a możliwości rozwoju gospodarstw rodzinnych w UE. Wieś i Rolnictwo, 1, 59-66 [in Polish].
7. Chernyakov, V.A. (2012). Modern drivers of modernization of USA agriculture. SShA i Kanada: jekonomika, politika, kul'tura – USA and Canada: economics, policy, culture, 11, 89 [in Russian].
8. Bilenko, S. Farming as a business: who are the Ukrainian farmers and which problems they face. Retrieved 11 December 2018 from delo.ua/business/fermerstvo-jak-biznes-hto-taki-ukrajinski-fermeri-i-z-jakimi-pro-334838/ [in Ukrainian].
№ 1/2019
BORODINA Olena Mykolaivna1, PROKOPA Ihor 2
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
2Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
Inclusive rural development: a scientific discourse
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2019; 1:70-85 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2019.01.070 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article considers the essential features of rural development as a multi-vector process, which not only involves economic growth in rural areas, but also requires its adaptation to human behavior, social and political structure of rural communities and their involvement in development processes. It also reflects systemic positive changes in rural areas, which are initiated "from bottom" and supported "from top". In this concept of rural development, inclusiveness is inherent.
The authors show that the development of the concept of "inclusive rural development" took place in the process of enrichment and specification of the theoretical concepts of sustainable development, inclusive growth and inclusive development in relation to the rural sector of society. This concept denotes a development whose result consists in the creation of proper conditions for the rural population for such purposes as: the use of land and other local resources in the economic activities; adequate distribution of the results of economic growth in the agriculture and other sectors of the rural economy; and participation in social and public life for the consolidation of communities and observance of human rights. Such development leads to the reduction of poverty, overcoming the economic, social and political exclusion of people residing in rural areas.
It is pointed out that ensuring the inclusive development is a function of the state regulation of national economy. To implement it in Ukraine, it is necessary to ensure, first of all, the implementation, in the regulatory and legal framework, of the global goals of sustainable development and the objectives for their achievement. That could be realized by adopting the Law on the Strategy for Sustainable Development until 2030, and, in the part of inclusive rural development, also the Law on the Basic Principles of the State Agrarian Policy and State Policy of Rural Development.
Keywords: inclusiveness, economic growth, inclusive development, human rights, rural development, social inclusion, Goals of Sustainable Development
JEL: E24, E25, Q01
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 70 - 85) | Download | Downloads :818 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Prebisch, R. (1996). A critique of peripheral capitalism. CEPAL Review, 1(1), 9-71. Retrieved from repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/12273/253_en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
3. UNDP (1997). Human Development Report 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/258/hdr_1997_en_complete_nostats.pdf
4. Sachs, I. (2004). Inclusive Development Strategy in an Era of Globalization. Policy Integration Department, World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization Working Paper, 35. Geneva: International Labour Office. Retrieved from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.6665&rep=rep1&type=pdf
5. Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine (2017). Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. National Report. Retrieved from www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/uk/home/library/sustainable-development-report/sustainable-development-goals--2017-basseline-national-report.html [in Ukrainian].
6. About the plenary session of the UN General Assembly on December 17, 2018. Retrieved from www.un.org/press/en/2018/ga12107.doc.htm [in Ukrainian].
7. Ali, I. and Son, H.H. (2007). Measuring inclusive growth. Asian Development Review, 24(1), 11-31. Retrieved from think-asia.org/bitstream/handle/11540/1704/Volume%2024_No%201_2007_02.pdf?sequence=1
8. Kosiedowski, W. (2016). Koncepcja rozwoju inkluzywnego i jej realizacja w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej. Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, 5, 74. Retrieved from www.iesw.lublin.pl/rocznik/articles/RIESW_1732-1395_14-5-276.pdf [in Polish].
9. Inclusive Wealth Report 2012: Measuring progress toward sustainability. Retrieved from www.ihdp.unu.edu/docs/Publications/Secretariat/Reports/SDMs/IWR%20SDM%20Low%20Resolution.pdf
10. Pouw, Nicky and Gupta, Joyeeta. Inclusive Development: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicky_Pouw/publication/315265627_Inclusive_Development_A_Multi-Disciplinary_Issue/links/5a0e043baca27244d28586cd/Inclusive-Development-A-Multi-Disciplinary-Issue.pdf
11. Directory for village and settlement leaders (2014). All-Ukrainian Association of Village and Village Councils, National University of Bioresources and Natural Resources of Ukraine, Project AgroInvest. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
12. Community-based rural development policy in Ukraine (2015). Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
13. The Inclusive Development Index 2018: Summary and Data Highlights. The World Economic Forum, committed to improving the state of the world. Retrieved from www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2018.pdf
14. Mantsurov, I.H. (2018). Inclusive development as a basis for counteracting the global challenges of the present. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Ukraine economy, 10, 71-87 [in Ukrainian].
15. Agenda for development. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/51/240 of 15 October 1997. Retrieved from undocs.org/en/A/RES/51/240 [in Russian].
16. FAO (2013). Voluntary Guidelines for Responsible Management of Ownership and Use of Land, Fisheries and Forest Resources in the Context of National Food Security. Rome. Retrieved from www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2801r/i2801r.pdf [in Russian].
17. Draft Law on the Strategy of Sustainable Development of Ukraine until 2030. Retrieved from w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=64508 [in Ukrainian].
18. Draft Law on the Basic Principles of State Agrarian Policy and State Policy for Rural Development. Retrieved from w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=64742 [in Ukrainian].
№ 1/2022
1Institute for Economics and Forecasting, NAS of Ukraine
RURAL COMPONENT OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THEIR INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2022; 1:124-140 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.01.124 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article deals with assessing the place of rural settlements and rural population in territorial communities (TC) - the basic link of the modern administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine and highlighting the preconditions and guidelines of inclusive development of rural population in these communities. The author reveals the factors of TC formation that determined their present composition and structure. It is noted that in their creation the decisive role was played by the important values of the projected indicators of population number and area of the "affluent" community. As a result, more than 2/3 of rural settlements and 61% of the rural population joined the TCs with centers in urban settlements (towns and urban-type settlements). Many urban and semi-urban TCs unite too many villages, which gives reason to question their belonging to urban territorial units, and no other types. Using methodological approaches to the identification of rural areas in the EU, the author compiles a classification of Ukrainian territorial communities on a functional (rather than administrative) basis. In terms of population density, the author separates communities with urban and rural population, and in terms of the share of rural residents in the TC's total population – those with predominantly urban, mixed (urban-rural) and predominantly rural nature of their territories. The distribution of rural settlements and rural population by these types of communities is carried out. In terms of both indicators, the absolute majority of TCs are communities with rural, or mostly rural and rural-urban functional type of territories. The author emphasizes that territorial communities have the main responsibility for the development of their territories and, consequently, for the inclusive development of their rural communities, and that the authorities should assist them in promoting such development by implementing various public policies, especially agricultural and regional ones. This includes, first of all, intensifying support for family and commercial farms, especially in small and peripheral villages, improving rural infrastructure, as well as unbundling TCs with a very large number of rural settlements and assisting new communities in their independent functioning.
The publication was prepared within the research project on "Inclusiveness of rural community development in the process of decentralization" (State Registration No 0120U100815).
Keywords:territorial communities, rural population, rural settlements, inclusive development, identification of rural areas
JEL: O18; Q18; R23
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 124 - 140) | Download | Downloads :255 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Borodina, O.M., Prokopa, I.V., Fraier, O.V. (2021). The assessment of rural communities' inclusiveness within territorial communities: the case of Lokachynska TC. Ukr. socìum – Ukrainian society, 4, 85-96. doi.org/10.15407/socium2021.04.085 [in Ukrainian].
3. Milbert, A. Typing city - a rural area for monitoring of urban and rural regions of Germany. Retrieved from drive.google,com/file/d/ 1eaQcW81iu41wbj7Dd20hgEHmI-E9MSyN/view [in Ukrainian].
4. Borawska, M. Obszary wiejskie w statystyce publicznej. Retrieved from rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z44_20.pdf [in Polish].
5. Storonians'ka, I.Z., Patyts'ka, Kh.O. (2020). Methodological approaches to the identification of rural areas: world practice. Ekonomika APK – Economics of the agro-industrial complex, 5, 97-107. doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202005097 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kowalka, E., Klimanek, T. (2015). Obszary wiejskie wojewodstwa wielkopolskiego i ich mieszkancy. Urzad Statystyczny w Poznaniu. Poznan. Retrieved from docplayer.pl/19455506-Ewa-kowalka-tomasz-klimanek.html [in Polish].
7. Storonians'ka, I.Z. (Ed.) (2020). Functional types of territories as an object of state regional policy: methodical approaches to identification. Lviv. Retrieved from ird.gov.ua/irdp/020200041.pdf [in Ukrainian].
8. State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021-2027. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/695-2020-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
9. Some issues of realization in 2021-2023 of the State Regional Development Strategy for 2021-2027. The Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated May 12, 2021, No. 497. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/497-2021-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
10. The concept of the State Target Program of Sustainable Development of Rural Territories for the period up to 2020. Approved by the order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated February 3, 2010 No.121- r.
Retrieved from www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/243284431 [in Ukrainian].
11. On approval of the concept of development of rural areas. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated September 23, 2015 No. 995-r. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995-2015-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
12. Project of the Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "On Approval of the Concept of Rural Development by 2030". Retrieved from www.me.gov.ua/Documents/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=a707d9ff-0c4b-4b8b-8d84-3f9a994ee729&title=ProektRozporiadzhenniaKabinetuMinistrivUkraini-proSkhvale [in Ukrainian].
13. Kowicki, M. (1997). Wies przyslosci jako alternatywa osadnictwa miasta. Politehnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kosciuszki. Krakow. URL: Kowicki M. – Wies Przyslosci. pdf (SECURED) [in Polish].
14. Come to us to live (2021, Feb. 24). Ridne selo – Home village, 4 (221). doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv23985hj.13 [in Ukrainian].
15. Free houses as a bonus for the revival of the village. Vinnytsia region is invited to live migrants and large families. Retrieved from www.vinnitsa.info/news/bezplatni-khaty-yak-bonus-za-vidrodzhennya-sela-na-vinnychchyni-zaproshuyut-zhyty-pereselentsiv-ta-bahatoditni-rodyny-foto.html [in Ukrainian].
16. Tkachuk, A. Black Cat Decentralization. Retrieved from zn.ua/ukr/internal/chorna-kishka-detsentralizatsiji.html [in Ukrainian].
17. Borodina, O.M. (Ed.) (2021). Justice in access to land resources and benefits from their use in rural areas. In Spatial justice in land use and sustainable rural development: in 2 books. Institute for economics and forecasting, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from ief.org.ua/docs/mg/350.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 |