HOME PAGE | |
№ 2023/1
KREHIVSKYI Oleh Volodymyrovych1
1Secretariat of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine
Dependences and ways to eliminate them: a past that resonates with the present
Ekon. prognozuvannâ 2023; 1:31-75 | https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2023.01.031 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The invasion of Russian troops into Ukraine has showed, on the one hand, the high cohesion and patriotism of Ukrainian society and their perception of independence as a higher value; on the other hand - the inability to preserve it with the resources of the national economy alone, and therefore - a high external dependence on the decisions of global leaders on the provision of aid and the use of the industrial base of the West to ensure the defense and security of Ukraine. Updated by S. Mariotti, the issue of "global protectionism" needs to be considered via the prism of the contextual economic conditions for the implementation of such a policy (wars, post-war recovery, crises). The purpose of the article is to investigate, based on the experience of the pioneer of industrial revolution and the adept of free market - Great Britain, the historical facts regarding the elites’ reaction to new challenges and threats of the beginning of the 20th century, and policy measures to encourage and protect national producers and their consequences, as well as to visualize various recent examples of protectionism, and draw conclusions for Ukraine.
Historical parallels between the situation at the beginning of the 20th century and the events of recent years give grounds for assuming that the answer to the question "How to speed up the recovery of Ukraine's economy during the period of severe war test?" should not be sought in modern policy measures of developed countries (where a powerful industrial potential has been created by the joint efforts of government and business over many years and the governments’ activities are focused on managing the crises to preserve and strengthen this potential), but rather in retrospective mechanisms that ensured the expansion of the existing and creation of new industries to strengthen the economic efficiency and national security.
The author shows that the state financial incentives and protectionist tariffs, introduced in Great Britain in the national interest in response to new challenges and threats, were effective for more than 40 years, which helped this country develop key industries, reduce dependence on imported strategic goods, and prepare for new challenges.
It is substantiated that the stimulating and protective mechanisms of India's policy, which have been launched recently to reduce dependence on the supply of strategic goods from China, are a reflection of the measures implemented by Great Britain at the beginning of the 20th century to reduce dependence on supplies of important goods from Germany. Similar mechanisms are being introduced by the United States in accordance with the interests of national security.
The author demonstrates that Ukraine has lower protective tariffs not only compared to Asian countries that are developing and protecting their own industry, but also to the EU. It is substantiated that when forming a strategy for economic independence and post-war recovery, Ukraine should take into account both the historical experience of Great Britain and the modern practices of introducing policy mechanisms to encourage and protect own industries for defense and security purposes.
Keywords:war, external dependence, industry, economic policy, free trade, protectionism, subsidies, licensing, tariffs
JEL: L52; L65; O14; O32
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 31 - 75) | Download | Downloads :145 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces Supply Chain Disruptions Task Force to Address Short-Term Supply Chain Discontinuities. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/08/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-supply-chain-disruptions-task-force-to-address-short-term-supply-chain-discontinuities/
3. Salikhova, O.B. (2021). Localization of pharmaceutical production in Europe as a response to growing external dependence. In Perspectives for post-coronavirus economic transformations and their impact on the development of countries. The place of Ukraine in the post-crisis world (p. 118-124). Kyiv: Zapovit [in Ukrainian].
4. Govt may hike customs duty on import of APIs by 10-15% to boost local production. Retrieved from www.businesstoday.in/industry/pharma/story/govt-may-hike-customs-duty-on-import-of-apis-by-10-15-to-boost-local-production-268883-2020-08-01
5. Modi’s mission self-reliance: Make in India, lower import dependence. Retrieved from economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/modis-mission-self-reliance-make-in-india-lower-import-dependence/articleshow/75704246.cms?from=mdr
6. Mariotti, Sergio (2022). A warning from the Russian–Ukrainian war: avoiding a future that rhymes with the past. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 3, 7-32. doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.03.007 [in Ukrainian].
7. Escaith, H. From Hyper-Globalization to Global Value Chains Decoupling: Withering Global Trade Governance? Retrieved from mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/115267/1/MPRA_paper_115263.pdf
8. The European Commission's Negotiating Strategy for the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial: Oral and Written Evidence (2006). Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Trade and Industry Committee. The Stationery Office.
9. Wardley-Kershaw, Julia, and Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus R. (2022). Economic Growth in the UK: Growth’s Battle with Crisis. Histories, 2, 374-404. doi.org/10.3390/histories2040028
10. Ritschel, D. (1997). The Politics of Planning: The Debate on Economic Planning in Britain in the 1930s. Clarendon Press.
11. Sidenko, V.R. (2002). The policy of support of the national producers in the context of Ukraine’s integration into the world economy. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 1, 45-54. eip.org.ua/docs/EP_02_1_45_uk.pdf [in Ukrainian].
12. Barker, J.E. (1920). Economic statesmanship. The great industrial and financial problems arising from the war. London: John Murray.
13. Barker, J.E. (1910). Great and Greater Britain; the problems of motherland and empire, political, naval, military, industrial, financial, social. New York: E.P. Dutton & company. doi.org/10.2307/1776956
14. Zig Layton-Henry (Ed.). (1980). Conservative Party Politics. Macmillan.
15. Marc-William Palen Protection, Federation and Union: The Global Impact of the McKinley Tariff upon the British Empire, 1890–94 (2010). The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 38: 3, 395-418. doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2010.503395
16. List, F. (1885). The National System of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green.
17. Reports of the Gainsborough Commission: Life and Labour in Germany, with an Appendix: Infirmity and Old Age Pensions in Germany (1907). Gainsborough Commission of British Workmen. Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Company, Limited.
18. Angell, N. (1910). The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage. NewYork and London: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
19. Curtiss, G.B. (1896). Protection and Prosperity: An Account of Tariff Legislation and Its Effect in Europe and America. Pan-American Publishing Company.
20. Eltzbacher, O. (1903). The Fiscal Policy of Germany. The Nineteenth Century and After, 54, July-December, 181-197. London: Sampson Low, Marston & Company, Limited.
21. Benham, F. (1941). Great Britain Under Protection. Macmillan.
22. Hatheway, W.F. (1909). Two Policies: Cobden's And Bismarck's. A Comparative Examination. In Kinloch-Cooke, Clement (Ed.). The Empire Reviews,. XVI, 422-429. London: Macmillan And Co., Limited.
23. Tilden, W.A. (1915). The supply of chemicals to Britain and her dependencies. In Gardner, Walter M. The British Coal-Tar Colour Industry; its Origin, Development and Decline (p. 315-334). London: Williams and Norgate.
24. Art. XII. The German Peril (1908, July). The Quarterly Review, 416, 264-298. London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. New York: Leonard Scott Publication Company.
25. European War (1914, August 22). Chemist and Druggist, LXXXV: 1804, 33-37. doi.org/10.1177/001258061403300109
26. The War And The Scarcity Of Some Drugs (1915). The British Medical Journal, 1(2830), 559-561. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/25313108; doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.2830.559
27. Aniline Dye Industry (State Aid) Volume 70: debated on Monday 22 February 1915. Retrieved from hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1915-02-22/debates/42879829-890c-4517-9d41-1bd0a7b6c961/AnilineDyeIndustry(StateAid)
28. Salikhova, O.B. (2021). British dependence on German imports. Responses to the challenges of the World War I. Ìstor. nar. gospod. ekon. dumki Ukr. – History of economics and economic thought of Ukraine, 54, 37-74. doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2021.54.037 [in Ukrainian]
29. Dyestuffs: Hearings Before the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives (1919, June 18-20 and July 14-18). United States. Congress House. Committee on Ways and Means U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. Salikhova, O.B., Honcharenko, D.O. (2020). Development policy of the pharmaceutical industry in Germany: lessons for Ukraine. Ekon. Ukr. – Economy of Ukraine, 10, 63-86. doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.10.063 [in Ukrainian].
31. Hamilton Walton Hale (Ed.). (1915). Current Economic Problems: A Series of Readings in the Control of Industrial Development. University of Chicago Press.
32. Great Britain. Parliament: Protection of home industries (1924 February 13). The Parliamentary Debates (Official Report), 169, 926-975. House of Commons H.M. Stationery Office, HC Deb Wednesday.
33. Lloyd, E.M.H. (1924). Experiments in State Control at the War Office and the Ministry of Food. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Division of Economics and History. Clarendon Press.
34. Salikhova, O.B., Krehivskyi, O.V. (2022). The state in the post-war industrial recovery and economic renewal: historical parallels and approaches for Ukraine. Ekon. prognozuvannâ – Economy and forecasting, 4, 7-42. doi.org/10.15407/eip2022.04.007 [in Ukrainian].
35. Barker, J.E. (1915). Modern Germany: Her Political and Economic Problems, Her Foreign and Domestic Policy, Her Ambitions, and the Causes of Her Successes and of Her Failures. Smith, Elder.
36. Economic Reconstruction: Analysis of Main Tendencies in the Principal Belligerent Countries of Europe with Statistics of Production, Consumption, and Trade in Important Foodstuffs and Industrial Raw Materials (1918). United States, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce U.S. Government Printing Office.
37. Great Britain. Parliament: Paris Economic Conference. Statement By Prime Minister (1916, August 2). The Parliamentary Debates (official Report), 85, 331-334. House of Commons H.M. Stationery Office, HC Deb Wednesday.
38. Johnson, P.B. (1968). Land Fit for Heroes: The Planning of British Reconstruction, 1916-1919. University of Chicago Press.
39. Final Report of the Committee on Commercial and Industrial Policy After the War (1918). Great Britain. Committee on Commercial and Industrial Policy Government.
40. Great Britain. Parliament: Industries (State Support) (1921, February 28). The Parliamentary Debates (official Report), 138, 1387-1388. House of Commons H.M. Stationery Office, HC Deb Monday.
41. The Dye Industry. Memorandum on the Scheme for State Assistance (1918, November 21). The Board of Trade Journal, 635-637.
42. Board of Trade. Vol. 126: debated on Monday 8 March 1920. Retrieved from hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1920-03-08/debates/6e7abaf8-2f9d-4857-b630-18a6758dc235/BoardOfTrade#
43. Great Britain. Parliament: Shielding unstable Key Industries (1919, August 18). The Parliamentary Debates (Official Report), 119, 2012-2013. House of Commons H.M. Stationery Office, HC Deb.
44. Criteria for judging defense essentiality in applying protection against imports. Foreign Economic Policy: Hearings Before the United States Joint Committee on the Economic Report (1955, Nov. 9, 10, 14-17). Subcommittee on Foreign Economic Policy, Eighty-Fourth Congress, First Session. United States. Congress. Joint Committee on the Economic Report. Subcommittee on Foreign Economic Policy U.S. Government Printing Office. Р. 299-305.
45. Key Industries Policy Vindicated (1939, September 9). The Chemist and Druggist, CXXXI: 3109, 285-286.
46. National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Economic and Social Studies (1943). Trade Regulations and Commercial Policy of the United Kingdom. No. 3. Cambridge: At the University Press.
47. Breithut, F.E. (1924). British Dyestuffs Industry. U.S. Government Printing Office.
48. Dyestuffs (Import Regulation) Act 1934. Retrieved from vlex.co.uk/vid/dyestuffs-import-regulation-act-808348621
49. Great Britain. Parliament: Dyestuffs (Import Regulation) Bill (1933, December 18). The Parliamentary Debates (official Report), 284, 987-1044. House of Commons. House of Commons H.M. Stationery Office, HC Deb.
50. The Safeguarding of Industries Bill. Memorandum by the President of the Board of Trade. Retrieved from filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-24-120-cp-21-2640.pdf
51. Bernard, Mallet, Oswald, George Cecil (1933). British Budgets: Third Series, 1921-22 to 1932-33. MacMillan and Company, Limited.
52. Mills, J. (2000). Managing the World Economy. Springer. doi.org/10.1057/9780333977842
53. Import Duties Act 1932. Retrieved from vlex.co.uk/vid/import-duties-act-1932-808401733
54. Commons Chamber Volume 504: debated on Tuesday 29 July 1952. Retrieved from hansard.parliament.uk/commons/1952-07-29/debates/ed07d311-aa2d-4c03-9e41-96ffb99c78ee/CommonsChamber
55. Federation of British Industry (1957). European Free Trade Area: A Survey for Industrialists. Federation of British Industries.
56. Import Duties Bill. Retrieved from Api.Parliament.Uk/Historic-Hansard/Lords/1958/Feb/18/Import-Duties-Bill
57. Import Duties Act 1958. Retrieved from vlex.co.uk/vid/import-duties-act-1958-808440725
58. The Public General Acts and Church Assembly Measure 1960 being those which received the Royal Assent during that year having been passed in the First or Second Session of the Forty second Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and during the eighth and ninth years of the Reign of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second with Tables of the Short Titles and of the Effect of Legislation and an Index (1961). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
59. Import Duty Drawbacks (Consolidation) Order 1962. Retrieved from vlex.co.uk/vid/import-duty-drawbacks-consolidation-812531013
60. The Import Duties Act 1958 (Repeals) (Appointed Day) Order 1973. Retrieved from www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1973/2176/made
61. Kaldor, N. (1983). The Economic Consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: Speeches in the House of Lords, 1979-1982. Duckworth.
62. Economic Policy Volume 405: debated on Wednesday 13 February 1980. Retrieved from hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/1980-02-13/debates/7dba3b33-c834-4faa-9890-8444659f6d67/EconomicPolicy
63. Zanuda, A. As the Ukrainian economy survived 2022. BBC. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-64008306
64. World Tariff Profiles 2022. Retrieved from www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/world_tariff_profiles22_e.htm
65. World Tariff Profiles 2020. Retrieved from www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/world_tariff_profiles20_e.htm
66. Nirmala Sitharaman's Budget 2020 Speech: Full Text. Retrieved from www.ndtv.com/india-news/finance-minister-nirmala-sitharamans-budget-2020-speech-full-text-2173184
67. India imposes anti-dumping duty on certain APIs from China. Retrieved from www.thepharmaletter.com/article/india-imposes-anti-dumping-duty-on-certain-apis-from-china?__cf_chl_tk=Dxi5fWXMhbdhxBMmIMPxwIKYz2KP8N1Rs6dZebntOQw-1678828897-0-gaNycGzNDNA
68. Final Findings issued recommending imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) from China PR and Korea RP (2023, January 19). Retrieved from tpm.in/news_center/final-findings-issued-recommending-imposition-of-anti-dumping-duty-on-imports-of-ursodeoxycholic-acid-udca-from-china-pr-and-korea-rp-19-01-2023/
69. Sperling, G. (2012, March 27). Remarks at the Conference on the Renaissance of American Manufacturing. Retrieved from obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/administration-official/sperling_-_renaissance_of_american_manufacturing_-_03_27_12.pdf
70. Remarks Upon Signing the Trade Expansion Act. Retrieved from www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-upon-signing-the-trade-expansion-act
71. 19 U.S. Code § 1862 - Safeguarding national security. Retrieved from www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/1862
72. United States Notifies Intent to Appeal WTO Panel Reports on Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Measures. Retrieved from www.wiley.law/alert-United-States-Notifies-Intent-to-Appeal-WTO-Panel-Reports-on-Section-232-Steel-and-Aluminum-Measures
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 |